Aircraft snatched back at Elstree?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aircraft snatched back at Elstree?
I am told that a large flying opperation at Elstree as had it's newest aircraft taken away due to non-payment of the lease fees.
Can anyone fill in the deatails?
Can anyone fill in the deatails?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fareham
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given this is a rumour site, surely we deserve to know who it is, together with some a spurious estimate of how much they owed, to whom etc., etc......
Indications of time to bankruptcy, how many students have paid up-front, how much they stand to loose and other such-like details much appreciated...
Indications of time to bankruptcy, how many students have paid up-front, how much they stand to loose and other such-like details much appreciated...
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a similar vein..... I popped into Swansea last week to be informed the resident parachute club pick up camp and moved in middle of night leaving a debt of £17K for fuel
It amazes me management allows tabs to get so high.
I asked if I could stick my uplift on their account
It amazes me management allows tabs to get so high.
I asked if I could stick my uplift on their account
You're in dangerous territory here. Any company having rumours about their solvency published in the public domain will be extremely unhappy, and potentially litigious.
#8 They (whoever "they" are) could have nothing to hide. You are talking about a company's reputation here, and any rumours of cashflow problems, no matter what the reality is, could have damaging repercussions in terms of what credit their suppliers extend them. As such, the directors of the company will take steps to protect their reputation, and hence their ability to trade.
A company is no different from a person in these circumstances - if someone accuses you wrongly of not being able to pay your bills, you ain't gonna be too happy when the next person you deal with won't accept a cheque from you!
A company is no different from a person in these circumstances - if someone accuses you wrongly of not being able to pay your bills, you ain't gonna be too happy when the next person you deal with won't accept a cheque from you!
niknak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many years ago, I worked for a well known brewery's pub repossesion department.
Very early, (4am) we went to "take back" a pub in Sheffield, we entered the premises to find that the Landlord had invited regulars to finish off the local stock and they were still in situ.
We took a hasty retreat....
Still, I bet that was no where near as scary as repossing an aeroplane
Was the TCAS switched on? Flaps down? Fuel burn set to lean....
Very early, (4am) we went to "take back" a pub in Sheffield, we entered the premises to find that the Landlord had invited regulars to finish off the local stock and they were still in situ.
We took a hasty retreat....
Still, I bet that was no where near as scary as repossing an aeroplane
Was the TCAS switched on? Flaps down? Fuel burn set to lean....
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You are talking about a company's reputation here, and any rumours of cashflow problems, no matter what the reality is, could have damaging repercussions in terms of what credit their suppliers extend them.
Once Upon A Time I was doing some work for a company. In due course it became slightly more difficult than it should have done to get paid; seeing as how I basically work for the money I stopped working for them, and went and worked for someone else who didn't seem to have a problem paying their bills.
I said nothing to anyone. In particular I spread no rumours about their credit-worthiness on the local usenet newsgroup.
And a few months someone posted to that newsgroup that they had lost a couple of months' income when the company finally went down the tubes.
Now, if I'd been more public spirited and spread the rumour around at the right time that guy wouldn't have been short of a couple of months' pay, would he, because he would also have stopped working for them.
So these days I'd publish something like "so and so has been a bit slow paying my last couple of bills, has anyone else had any problem with them?" which would be completely true and unactionable (I hope!) but would convey the necessary warning.
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Now, if I'd been more public spirited and spread the rumour around at the right time that guy wouldn't have been short of a couple of months' pay, would he, because he would also have stopped working for them.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Morton-in-Marsh
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well so far this has been a most illuminating post - Not! No idea if an aircraft really has been repossessed, no idea from whom if it has, no idea whether I should worry about being paid by a particular company or not.
Hamish 123 is right, of course: malicious rumours or false rumours can do damage and there might be the possibility of redress. But if it is true - and someone muct know if it is - then I'd rather know.
Just think about why an aircraft might be repossessed.
Hamish 123 is right, of course: malicious rumours or false rumours can do damage and there might be the possibility of redress. But if it is true - and someone muct know if it is - then I'd rather know.
Just think about why an aircraft might be repossessed.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But then isn't one of the main men at said (or said not) establishment also the owner of a number of aircraft leasing companies who lease aircraft to the said (or said not) establishment?! Allegedly....
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
That's quite a large assumption - all he would have had would have been your rumour. He might have taken a view that it was just a rumour, perhaps even being spread by a competitor or a malicious former employee.