Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Aircraft snatched back at Elstree?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Aircraft snatched back at Elstree?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th June 2007 | 14:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 2
From: north of barlu
Aircraft snatched back at Elstree?

I am told that a large flying opperation at Elstree as had it's newest aircraft taken away due to non-payment of the lease fees.

Can anyone fill in the deatails?
A and C is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2007 | 18:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 9
From: Fareham
Given this is a rumour site, surely we deserve to know who it is, together with some a spurious estimate of how much they owed, to whom etc., etc......

Indications of time to bankruptcy, how many students have paid up-front, how much they stand to loose and other such-like details much appreciated...
Nipper2 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2007 | 18:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: UK
On a similar vein..... I popped into Swansea last week to be informed the resident parachute club pick up camp and moved in middle of night leaving a debt of £17K for fuel
It amazes me management allows tabs to get so high.
I asked if I could stick my uplift on their account
contrail is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2007 | 20:58
  #4 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, but to make it more interesting...

How many schools were threatened by the risk of crashing planes?

Banks and Bankers doncha juss luvem

Sir George Cayley
 
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 06:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
Don't you mean Grabair ?
Will Hung is offline  
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 08:45
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 128
Likes: 4
From: London
You're in dangerous territory here. Any company having rumours about their solvency published in the public domain will be extremely unhappy, and potentially litigious.
Hamish 123 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 09:13
  #7 (permalink)  
Blah Blah Blah
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Malmesbury VRP
which means they must have something to hide
gcolyer is offline  
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 09:27
  #8 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Guys

Please listen to Hamish and think of Danny & Rob.

Ultimately they will be held responsible for your postings.
 
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 09:52
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 128
Likes: 4
From: London
#8 They (whoever "they" are) could have nothing to hide. You are talking about a company's reputation here, and any rumours of cashflow problems, no matter what the reality is, could have damaging repercussions in terms of what credit their suppliers extend them. As such, the directors of the company will take steps to protect their reputation, and hence their ability to trade.

A company is no different from a person in these circumstances - if someone accuses you wrongly of not being able to pay your bills, you ain't gonna be too happy when the next person you deal with won't accept a cheque from you!
Hamish 123 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 12:17
  #10 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: UK
Many years ago, I worked for a well known brewery's pub repossesion department.

Very early, (4am) we went to "take back" a pub in Sheffield, we entered the premises to find that the Landlord had invited regulars to finish off the local stock and they were still in situ.
We took a hasty retreat....

Still, I bet that was no where near as scary as repossing an aeroplane

Was the TCAS switched on? Flaps down? Fuel burn set to lean....
niknak is offline  
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 16:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: god knows
My post deleted to reflect on others concerns and for Danny and Rob.; However this has been mentioned on another forum aswell.

Dom
Pilotdom is offline  
Reply
Old 19th June 2007 | 17:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
You are talking about a company's reputation here, and any rumours of cashflow problems, no matter what the reality is, could have damaging repercussions in terms of what credit their suppliers extend them.
Yes ... well ...

Once Upon A Time I was doing some work for a company. In due course it became slightly more difficult than it should have done to get paid; seeing as how I basically work for the money I stopped working for them, and went and worked for someone else who didn't seem to have a problem paying their bills.

I said nothing to anyone. In particular I spread no rumours about their credit-worthiness on the local usenet newsgroup.

And a few months someone posted to that newsgroup that they had lost a couple of months' income when the company finally went down the tubes.

Now, if I'd been more public spirited and spread the rumour around at the right time that guy wouldn't have been short of a couple of months' pay, would he, because he would also have stopped working for them.

So these days I'd publish something like "so and so has been a bit slow paying my last couple of bills, has anyone else had any problem with them?" which would be completely true and unactionable (I hope!) but would convey the necessary warning.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 08:04
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 128
Likes: 4
From: London
Fine. Say what you want, when you want. It just better be true, that's all.
Hamish 123 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 08:05
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I thought this was a rumour network....
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 10:10
  #15 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 2
From: Between the woods and the water
Now, if I'd been more public spirited and spread the rumour around at the right time that guy wouldn't have been short of a couple of months' pay, would he, because he would also have stopped working for them.
That's quite a large assumption - all he would have had would have been your rumour. He might have taken a view that it was just a rumour, perhaps even being spread by a competitor or a malicious former employee.
airborne_artist is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 10:26
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Morton-in-Marsh
Well so far this has been a most illuminating post - Not! No idea if an aircraft really has been repossessed, no idea from whom if it has, no idea whether I should worry about being paid by a particular company or not.

Hamish 123 is right, of course: malicious rumours or false rumours can do damage and there might be the possibility of redress. But if it is true - and someone muct know if it is - then I'd rather know.

Just think about why an aircraft might be repossessed.
Riverboat is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 12:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
Er, how about calling them?
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 14:50
  #18 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: west sussex
would those aircraft be the diamond stars?

if so, then according to the owner who leases them to Cabair, there are no problems with the payments
D SQDRN 97th IOTC is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 18:29
  #19 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 630
Likes: 2
From: UK
But then isn't one of the main men at said (or said not) establishment also the owner of a number of aircraft leasing companies who lease aircraft to the said (or said not) establishment?! Allegedly....
smarthawke is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2007 | 19:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
That's quite a large assumption - all he would have had would have been your rumour. He might have taken a view that it was just a rumour, perhaps even being spread by a competitor or a malicious former employee.
Sure, but I'm happy that he, being a grown up, can make his own decisions on the basis of available information; the point being that I wouldn't then, either way, be feeling guilty about having withheld such information.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.