PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Private Flying (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying-63/)
-   -   Aircraft snatched back at Elstree? (https://www.pprune.org/private-flying/280533-aircraft-snatched-back-elstree.html)

A and C 18th June 2007 14:02

Aircraft snatched back at Elstree?
 
I am told that a large flying opperation at Elstree as had it's newest aircraft taken away due to non-payment of the lease fees.

Can anyone fill in the deatails?

Nipper2 18th June 2007 18:03

Given this is a rumour site, surely we deserve to know who it is, together with some a spurious estimate of how much they owed, to whom etc., etc......

Indications of time to bankruptcy, how many students have paid up-front, how much they stand to loose and other such-like details much appreciated...

contrail 18th June 2007 18:54

On a similar vein..... I popped into Swansea last week to be informed the resident parachute club pick up camp and moved in middle of night leaving a debt of £17K for fuel :eek:
It amazes me management allows tabs to get so high.
I asked if I could stick my uplift on their account :E

Sir George Cayley 18th June 2007 20:58

Yes, but to make it more interesting...

How many schools were threatened by the risk of crashing planes?:eek:

Banks and Bankers doncha juss luvem:{

Sir George Cayley

Will Hung 19th June 2007 06:46

Don't you mean Grabair ?

Hamish 123 19th June 2007 08:45

You're in dangerous territory here. Any company having rumours about their solvency published in the public domain will be extremely unhappy, and potentially litigious.

gcolyer 19th June 2007 09:13

which means they must have something to hide:eek:

Final 3 Greens 19th June 2007 09:27

Guys

Please listen to Hamish and think of Danny & Rob.

Ultimately they will be held responsible for your postings.

Hamish 123 19th June 2007 09:52

#8 They (whoever "they" are) could have nothing to hide. You are talking about a company's reputation here, and any rumours of cashflow problems, no matter what the reality is, could have damaging repercussions in terms of what credit their suppliers extend them. As such, the directors of the company will take steps to protect their reputation, and hence their ability to trade.

A company is no different from a person in these circumstances - if someone accuses you wrongly of not being able to pay your bills, you ain't gonna be too happy when the next person you deal with won't accept a cheque from you!

niknak 19th June 2007 12:17

Many years ago, I worked for a well known brewery's pub repossesion department.

Very early, (4am) we went to "take back" a pub in Sheffield, we entered the premises to find that the Landlord had invited regulars to finish off the local stock and they were still in situ.
We took a hasty retreat....

Still, I bet that was no where near as scary as repossing an aeroplane:eek:;)

Was the TCAS switched on? Flaps down? Fuel burn set to lean....

Pilotdom 19th June 2007 16:46

My post deleted to reflect on others concerns and for Danny and Rob.; However this has been mentioned on another forum aswell.

Dom

Gertrude the Wombat 19th June 2007 17:02


You are talking about a company's reputation here, and any rumours of cashflow problems, no matter what the reality is, could have damaging repercussions in terms of what credit their suppliers extend them.
Yes ... well ...

Once Upon A Time I was doing some work for a company. In due course it became slightly more difficult than it should have done to get paid; seeing as how I basically work for the money I stopped working for them, and went and worked for someone else who didn't seem to have a problem paying their bills.

I said nothing to anyone. In particular I spread no rumours about their credit-worthiness on the local usenet newsgroup.

And a few months someone posted to that newsgroup that they had lost a couple of months' income when the company finally went down the tubes.

Now, if I'd been more public spirited and spread the rumour around at the right time that guy wouldn't have been short of a couple of months' pay, would he, because he would also have stopped working for them.

So these days I'd publish something like "so and so has been a bit slow paying my last couple of bills, has anyone else had any problem with them?" which would be completely true and unactionable (I hope!) but would convey the necessary warning.

Hamish 123 20th June 2007 08:04

Fine. Say what you want, when you want. It just better be true, that's all.

S-Works 20th June 2007 08:05

I thought this was a rumour network....

airborne_artist 20th June 2007 10:10


Now, if I'd been more public spirited and spread the rumour around at the right time that guy wouldn't have been short of a couple of months' pay, would he, because he would also have stopped working for them.
That's quite a large assumption - all he would have had would have been your rumour. He might have taken a view that it was just a rumour, perhaps even being spread by a competitor or a malicious former employee.

Riverboat 20th June 2007 10:26

Well so far this has been a most illuminating post - Not! No idea if an aircraft really has been repossessed, no idea from whom if it has, no idea whether I should worry about being paid by a particular company or not.

Hamish 123 is right, of course: malicious rumours or false rumours can do damage and there might be the possibility of redress. But if it is true - and someone muct know if it is - then I'd rather know.

Just think about why an aircraft might be repossessed.

S-Works 20th June 2007 12:52

Er, how about calling them?

D SQDRN 97th IOTC 20th June 2007 14:50

would those aircraft be the diamond stars?

if so, then according to the owner who leases them to Cabair, there are no problems with the payments

smarthawke 20th June 2007 18:29

But then isn't one of the main men at said (or said not) establishment also the owner of a number of aircraft leasing companies who lease aircraft to the said (or said not) establishment?! Allegedly....

Gertrude the Wombat 20th June 2007 19:25


That's quite a large assumption - all he would have had would have been your rumour. He might have taken a view that it was just a rumour, perhaps even being spread by a competitor or a malicious former employee.
Sure, but I'm happy that he, being a grown up, can make his own decisions on the basis of available information; the point being that I wouldn't then, either way, be feeling guilty about having withheld such information.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:12.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.