Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

C172 Maximum Cross wind

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

C172 Maximum Cross wind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th May 2007 | 10:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Key words are "pilot capability".

Lets look at the situation from a different point of view.

If the POH said that max demonstrated crosswind was 50 knots (limit after which you lost rudder authority) would you feel safe and legal trying to land with 45 knots across if you weren't used to crosswinds exceeding 15 knots?
AfricanEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 11:15
  #22 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Another key perspective is gusts.

20 knots steady is one challenge, 15 gusting 25 another.

Give me the former anyday.
 
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 11:31
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Blah Blah Blah
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Malmesbury VRP
I had 17 gusting 32 in the PA32 once. That was pretty hairy when I was 6 up in the aircraft.
gcolyer is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 12:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Another key perspective is gusts.

20 knots steady is one challenge, 15 gusting 25 another.

Give me the former anyday.

F3G,

The thing to remember his is that you may not know what the gust factor is.

By ICAO convention, only gusts which are 10kts or more above the mean wind speed in a certain period (I think it's the previous 10 minutes) are reported.

So while you might be happy with 20kts, but not happy 15kts gusting 25, the 15kts gusting 25kts could actually be much better! This is because the 20kts could easily be 20kts gusting 29kts, in which case the gust factor won't be reported, becuase it's less than 10kts over the mean wind speed!

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 12:06
  #25 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 17
From: U.K.
The reason Cessna and others use this wording is because of fear of being sued. If someone lost it in less than the stated limit then there was room for the manufacturer being "done" under the ridiculously litigeous American legal system.

So they changed it to this wooly advisory limit. The key is though, don't push your capabilities. If you aren't used to big winds, then go and have a cup of tea and when they drop a bit, get out and practice but make sure you have someone with you who can handle it!
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 12:52
  #26 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dublin Pilot

I was talking about actual conditions not interpreting forecasts.

The difference is pretty obvious when you are flying the approach.
 
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 13:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
F3G,

I'm not talking about forecasts either, but observations passed from either ATIS or passed from the tower.

If you're able to decide that you're comfortable from either the seat of your pants, or from the wind sock then that's fine.....and I suppose as an experienced pilot you should be.

I'm just surprised when people start to say that they find one particular set of numbers acceptable, but another not acceptable, but yet the acceptable ones may actually be more severe than the unacceptable ones

I'm sure you know what I mean, but I often suspect people don't really understand what is being reported to them when they get a wind report

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 13:27
  #28 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 208
From: Toronto
A lot can depend on how frequently you are flying and how well attuned you are to the a/c handling. Just got back to gliders after the winter break and my landings in one type are not yet as good as they were last November.

The fun part of landing in strong winds is dealing with the sheer. I still remember approaching a strip in a 20+ kt. crosswind that suddenly disappeared as I came below the tops of the 30' spruce trees
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2007 | 14:06
  #29 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dublinpilot

I see where you are coming from, but I was literally talking about the conditions.

Stick, feet, sock, visual (smoke, grass and standing crop etc) all help as you say.

The roughest day I ever flew on was only gusting up to 23 knots (I watched the anenometer before and after the flight), but it threw the SA120 all over the place, since there was quite some variation in wind direction, too.

The Bulldog had more than enough rudder authority to handle 23 knots (and it was not all cross either), but it was a rough old day.
 
Reply
Old 9th May 2007 | 14:38
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Blah Blah Blah
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Malmesbury VRP
If qnyone is interested

A C172 h quiet easily handles a crosswind of 25kts gusting 36kts.

I had to land in those conditions at Lille last night. Tha TAF lied and the winds did not drop off like predicted, they got stronger!
gcolyer is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.