P1 s?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IOW
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
P1 s?
sorry if this has been asked before but im a bit confused
i had a checkout with a new club on a new type recently and the instuctor told me to log it as p1s didnt think about it at the time but now not sure what it means, its only 1hr and im not joining the club anyway but just wanted to know for curiosity
i thought p1 s is for ppl holders on test for higher licences say a cpl test, (pls correct me if im wrong)
thanx
i had a checkout with a new club on a new type recently and the instuctor told me to log it as p1s didnt think about it at the time but now not sure what it means, its only 1hr and im not joining the club anyway but just wanted to know for curiosity
i thought p1 s is for ppl holders on test for higher licences say a cpl test, (pls correct me if im wrong)
thanx
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope you are totally correct and the instructor is wrong.
There will be no doubt a huge argument about this but if it was a class i.e SEP and a type you are current on and the club was just checking to make you sure you were safe then you are perfectly entitled to log P1 and the instructor nothing.
If it is a new type to you or you are not current then the Instructor should be P1 and you PUT. Again technically if you are current on SEP you could be P1 but if you are on a new type then you should be learning something?
This is how I do checkouts.
If it was 1hr then log it as PUT and get him to sign it, you can then use t he flight for your 1hr flight with an Instructor for renewal.
There will be no doubt a huge argument about this but if it was a class i.e SEP and a type you are current on and the club was just checking to make you sure you were safe then you are perfectly entitled to log P1 and the instructor nothing.
If it is a new type to you or you are not current then the Instructor should be P1 and you PUT. Again technically if you are current on SEP you could be P1 but if you are on a new type then you should be learning something?
This is how I do checkouts.
If it was 1hr then log it as PUT and get him to sign it, you can then use t he flight for your 1hr flight with an Instructor for renewal.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I normally fly a Cub, but last weekend I had some spin training in a Citabria at the club where I leaned to fly.
I was with my original very experienced instructor, and he logged me as P1(s) ,type familiarisation .
Lister
I was with my original very experienced instructor, and he logged me as P1(s) ,type familiarisation .
Lister
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
P1(S)
bose-x is correct.
LASORS page 43 case J - has the absolute definition but generally we instructors (not examining) doing 1 hr experience for SEP/dual checks/spinning etc. cannot sign you off as P1(S).
Anyway, I have jsut put what bose-x has put so i won't rattle on any longer.
LASORS page 43 case J - has the absolute definition but generally we instructors (not examining) doing 1 hr experience for SEP/dual checks/spinning etc. cannot sign you off as P1(S).
Anyway, I have jsut put what bose-x has put so i won't rattle on any longer.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lister, then your FI was wrong. As Bose has said, there is no latitude on this, unless you are on a flight test with an examiner, then you can only be P/UT if an instructor logs a flight as P1.
P1/S has a specific definition and your flight did not fall into it.
P1/S has a specific definition and your flight did not fall into it.
Had the same argument after a check-out in a Warrior a couple of months back at a club new to me not a million miles from "Vectis". CFI / Owner absolutely adamant that I book and have signed off P1 / S - Club Checkout. No amount of arguing (and there was some) was going to change her mind.
From my point of view I was P1 and if putting an "S" next to it got the hour in the right column, I was not going to get too upset.
The opinion cast was that whenever an instructor is on board, irrespective of the status of the person in the LH seat they (unless firmly trussed up) were the ultimate authority (with ultimate responibility) if it all went to r@t sh't.
This is one that just never goes away.
From my point of view I was P1 and if putting an "S" next to it got the hour in the right column, I was not going to get too upset.
The opinion cast was that whenever an instructor is on board, irrespective of the status of the person in the LH seat they (unless firmly trussed up) were the ultimate authority (with ultimate responibility) if it all went to r@t sh't.
This is one that just never goes away.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Instructor gives Instruction if a pilot is current on type and having a flight to demonstrate that they are safe then they are not recieving Instruction and so they are P1 and Instructor is just an observer and should log nothing.
If the pilot requires Instruction during the flight on an aspect of the flight then they are being given Instruction.
When I check someone out current on type I state at the start of the flight they are in command and I am just there to observe they are safe to meet the insurance requirements. If I see anything during the flight that is unsafe then I will state I have control and that I become pilot in command, the flight then becomes a training flight.
If I am checking someone out who is current on class but is new to type then I would hope I am teaching them something specific to that aircraft and then it a training flight and they are PUT.
If the pilot requires Instruction during the flight on an aspect of the flight then they are being given Instruction.
When I check someone out current on type I state at the start of the flight they are in command and I am just there to observe they are safe to meet the insurance requirements. If I see anything during the flight that is unsafe then I will state I have control and that I become pilot in command, the flight then becomes a training flight.
If I am checking someone out who is current on class but is new to type then I would hope I am teaching them something specific to that aircraft and then it a training flight and they are PUT.
That's two of us on the same hymn sheet ...... I am afraid like anything else in this world ..... lots of others seem to have a deeply ingrained, unshakable incorrect opinion.
Life's too short .....
Life's too short .....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IOW
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dave Gittins - im with you on this at least it was in the right column i would have paid more attention at the time if i was losing P1 not gaining,
is anyone ever likely to query this/ask me what it was as its logged wrongly or do i just ignore it as its only 1hr?
is anyone ever likely to query this/ask me what it was as its logged wrongly or do i just ignore it as its only 1hr?
Professional Student
Vectis Lady - judging by the amount of times that the question gets asked here on Pprune, I would guess that there is no definte answer.
I had a check at a new club, and I've logged it in the P1 column as P1/S...If the authorities call me on it I'll change it! Otherwise I'm not too bothered.
I had a check at a new club, and I've logged it in the P1 column as P1/S...If the authorities call me on it I'll change it! Otherwise I'm not too bothered.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hobbit, there is a definitive answer, just look at LASORS it is very clearly laid down in there.
For the seven hundredth time.
P/UT- any time you fly with an FI who logs the flight as P1.
P1/S- ONLY when you fly with an examiner on a successful flight test. A checkout doesn't count.
P1- When you are PIC.
There can only be one P1 logged on a single flight, why does it matter anyway? You may aswell do it properly.
For the seven hundredth time.
P/UT- any time you fly with an FI who logs the flight as P1.
P1/S- ONLY when you fly with an examiner on a successful flight test. A checkout doesn't count.
P1- When you are PIC.
There can only be one P1 logged on a single flight, why does it matter anyway? You may aswell do it properly.
Professional Student
No worries - fair one, didn't know that. Thanks - although in my defence, my logbook has been sent off to the CAA & perused by other instructors since, none of which made any comment! Ah well.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
J Pilot undergoing any form of
flight test with a JAA or CAA
Authorised Examiner (other
than case K).
N/A PIC U/S for successful
test
P/UT for unsuccessful
test
Enter time in ‘P1’ column
and have it certified by
aircraft commander.
Enter time in ‘Dual’ column
flight test with a JAA or CAA
Authorised Examiner (other
than case K).
N/A PIC U/S for successful
test
P/UT for unsuccessful
test
Enter time in ‘P1’ column
and have it certified by
aircraft commander.
Enter time in ‘Dual’ column
vectis lady - you should log the time as PU/T - I assume the other pilot was actually a FI? It would indeed be a good idea to have him/her sign your logbook column for rating revalidation purposes.
There is actually very little point in worrying about P1S time - since all licensing requirements specify PU/T time, PIC time and total time. PICU/S for successful check rides - fine. But although there is logic in recording flight by a pilot with a valid rating flying under the supervision of a FI ot CRI(SPA) as P1 under supervision, it won't actually matter in the big picture.... But it is NOT PIC time unless the other person is flying as a passenger.
A Club I know of was conducting 'check rides' on newly arrived pilots as a requirement they'd dreamt up - even though the pilot might have been current on the aircraft variant. The pilot being checked paid for the flight, logged it as PICU/S and the 'checking' pilot logged the time as P1C. But the 'checking pilot' held neither a FI rating nor CRI(SPA) rating....
There is actually very little point in worrying about P1S time - since all licensing requirements specify PU/T time, PIC time and total time. PICU/S for successful check rides - fine. But although there is logic in recording flight by a pilot with a valid rating flying under the supervision of a FI ot CRI(SPA) as P1 under supervision, it won't actually matter in the big picture.... But it is NOT PIC time unless the other person is flying as a passenger.
A Club I know of was conducting 'check rides' on newly arrived pilots as a requirement they'd dreamt up - even though the pilot might have been current on the aircraft variant. The pilot being checked paid for the flight, logged it as PICU/S and the 'checking' pilot logged the time as P1C. But the 'checking pilot' held neither a FI rating nor CRI(SPA) rating....
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Age: 51
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bose-x, just to play devil's advocate, surely the fact that the option for you to take over exists implies that you were in fact PIC all along? If the engine cut out, for example, would you take control, and if so doesn't this mean that the pilot being checked out was never really in command?
If the other person was a PPL holder and was down as PIC, bose-x would only be a passenger in the eyes of the law.
Any such 'passenger' taking control from the Commander is very likely to be viewed as carrying out an act of 'unlawful intereference' - if it all turned to rats, the insurance company would have a field day.
The ONLY safe option is for any check-out (except, perhaps, amongst members of private owner syndicate) to be conducted by a FI or CRI(SPA) who will act as PIC.
Any such 'passenger' taking control from the Commander is very likely to be viewed as carrying out an act of 'unlawful intereference' - if it all turned to rats, the insurance company would have a field day.
The ONLY safe option is for any check-out (except, perhaps, amongst members of private owner syndicate) to be conducted by a FI or CRI(SPA) who will act as PIC.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spoken like a true FI....
I have verified the situation with PLD and they see nothing wrong with my method. I am not an hours builder and don't really care about taking hours.
In the even of a problem as an Instructor I am deemed to be able to deal with a situation. Should the P1 be unable to deal with such a situation then I would take over. Otherwise I am perfectly happy to be a passenger.
Everyone is entitled to there view but lets not try and hide behind Insurance companies as usual.
I have verified the situation with PLD and they see nothing wrong with my method. I am not an hours builder and don't really care about taking hours.
In the even of a problem as an Instructor I am deemed to be able to deal with a situation. Should the P1 be unable to deal with such a situation then I would take over. Otherwise I am perfectly happy to be a passenger.
Everyone is entitled to there view but lets not try and hide behind Insurance companies as usual.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the 8 years I've been instructing, I can only think of a couple of occasions where it hasn't been necessary to do any instructing whilst doing checkouts.
I always want the pilot I'm flying with to get something out of the flight, after all they are paying for it! So it would be very, very rare that I just sit there. So for me this whole sitting there scenario just doesn't happen!
I always want the pilot I'm flying with to get something out of the flight, after all they are paying for it! So it would be very, very rare that I just sit there. So for me this whole sitting there scenario just doesn't happen!