Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Aerad IFR Charts

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Aerad IFR Charts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2007, 20:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerad IFR Charts

A couple of years ago AERAD decided to combine their HI and LO IFR EU charts onto single charts. This met with a lot of opposition as the LO info was very hard to read. Apparently a lot of people bought Jeppesen LO charts as they kept their HI and LO EU charts seperate.

I did just that but did not like the Jeppesen charts.

I heard a story that AERAD were going to go back to publishing seperate HI and LO EU charts. Is this true?
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 14:31
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Further to my own question, I have now heard from European Aeronautical Group (who publish Aerad Charts) that they are planning to release UK & EU Low Altitude Charts seperately later this year. Good news.
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 15:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too chose the Jepp airways charts for their much better readibility, but to be honest have not yet had a reason to look at a paper IFR chart.

One cannot generally plan an airways route acceptable to CFMU off the printed chart anyway, so one uses various electronic tools like Flitestar and this autorouting website, and I print off enroute sections from Flitestar.

However I admit that if you don't use any PC tools for flying, and always get ATC to amend the route as necessary, then the paper chart is a must, and one needs to draw the "flight plan accepted" route back onto it.
IO540 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 17:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too use the rfinder website to get an IFR route. I then plot it with Navbox Pro Plan, then use either the Austrian AIS website or [url]http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.be to check its acceptabilty for Eurocontrol. Navbox Proplan gives me a Plog and a printed ATS Flight Plan.
However before filing it or checking the route's availability I check the planned route on a Chart. This is because I can remember trialing Flitestar and it did not know about weekend airways or one way airways.
I then carry the chart on the aircraft during the flight because invariably I will be given a reroute by ATC.
As I said the "new" HI/LO Aerad charts were a backwood step and I found the Jeppesens in Europe very hard to read. That is why I am glad Aerad is bringing back LO airway charts.

Last edited by beerdrinker; 26th Mar 2007 at 18:33.
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 18:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dry bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One cannot generally plan an airways route acceptable to CFMU off the printed chart anyway

Not quite understanding this one?

You must realise that the base of alot of airways are way above you and the capabilities of your aircraft. Unless you have oxygen. The reason why CFMU spits out your flight plan is most likely because it has been incorrectly filed. You enter an airway thats base is above the FL you have filed then it will not accept it. I would suggest using DCT between way points off airways that you will not be flying in.
shaun ryder is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 18:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, but I do not understand your points when discussing Airway Charts.

I get a route from the rfinder website, check that it is acceptable to Eurocontrol, file, it and have it accepted. During that planning stage I check the base level of the airways and file appropriately. It is easy to check such things on a chart.
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 18:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dry bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, the Aerad chart is far more user friendly than Jeppessen.
shaun ryder is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 18:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course I have oxygen - airways flight in Europe is quite difficult without it - but that's not the point. The point is that the chart doesn't contain all the required information. There are all kinds of conditions on which routes can be used when. A whole big subject.
IO540 is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 09:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get the Aerad charts with my No1 AIDU plates but actually use the Jepp charts for flight planning. As IO points out getting an acceptable plan is harder, you HAVE to read the text pages that are amended every 2 weeks to check what limits are places on certain routes at certain times of the day.

You will often plan a route on the chart with all of the MEA's waypoints etc correct file it and it will bounce. Reading the text notes you will find that a certain section of XXX airway is not available between x & x times and thats why your plan bounced.

But back to the original question...... My Aerad guide is still showing a combined chart for this year.
S-Works is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 12:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CFMU - particularly amussing trying to plan to and from LOWS at or below FL150
mm_flynn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.