Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Helping out new PPLs

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Helping out new PPLs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th November 2006 | 20:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
someone is just trying to

- share hiring costs

- pull a good looking female student


[cynical]
high-hopes is offline  
Reply
Old 15th November 2006 | 20:35
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 1
From: Sth Bucks UK
I'd be interested to know what people consider to be the transition time from "Newbie" to "experienced mentor"
stickandrudderman is offline  
Reply
Old 15th November 2006 | 21:36
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Interesting S&Rman.

I'd say if you've done something a few times, and are comfortable with it and understand your subject matter, then you can be a mentor to someone has never done it.

If you've gone to LeTouquet a few times, then you can certainly help out someone who's nervous about doing it for the first time.

If you've flown further afiled a far bit, then you have help out someone who hasn't.

If you've done a lot of IFR flying, then you can help out someone who hasn't.

It's not about number of hours, or overall knowledge. It's about having experience at a particular part of aviation, and being willing to share it with someone who want's to learn.

You can be a newbie in one area of aviation, and a mentor in another

IO540 - If you're looking to pass on some of your knowledge, to those your local club can't complain about, I'd love to take up the opportunity! I reckon you'd make a great 'teacher' (I'm reluctant to use the word instructor ).

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 15th November 2006 | 21:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Interesting stuff. My "friend" was invited to accompany a newbie PPL(H) to Le2K recently. She's a CPL(H) but insisted that I also come along as despite being a lowly PPL, I 've 15 times her hours and have done Europe 15 times more than she has.

It worked well for all concerned, I saw more of rotary ops and they gained in paperwork procedures (GAR and flight plan) and Mark I eyeball nav and traffic alerting.

I've flown quite a few on here aerobatically - but I'd rather know the person first and then decide if I want to offer a trip. A-B stuff is pretty dull for me in the Pitts and despite spending some dosh, the radio/intercom/noise-cx h/sets really are not conducive to long chats about technique/critique.

However, in principle, I applaud the concept.
stiknruda is offline  
Reply
Old 15th November 2006 | 22:11
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: UK
I agree with the attitude of 'some' flying schools. I did my PPL in USA and come back and got checked out on their aeroplanes. The instructor was fine. However the school have turned their noses a little at the fact that i won't join the club as a member and that i haven't dont my PPL with them.

Thing is this has a knock on effect when i come to choose a school to do my CPL with.
XL319 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th November 2006 | 23:32
  #26 (permalink)  

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
transition time from "Newbie" to "experienced mentor"
Pretty much as DP puts it.
englishal is offline  
Reply
Old 17th November 2006 | 18:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
Actually it was not you I was referring to! But if the cap fits then feel free to wear it! But do tell me why I stopped renewing my membership at your place? I seem to recall it being nothing more than not getting a reminder and forgetting about it.....

Allthough there is a point, I have missed the emails!!
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 18th November 2006 | 18:35
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
To get an FI rating one needs to pass the JAA CPL exams. Unless (AIUI) one is going to instruct for free, and then you will be "really popular" in the vicinity, among the schools who have to pay their instructors.

It's no wonder that few if any experienced PPLs do this kind of thing, except very informally on a prearranged 1-1 basis.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th November 2006 | 19:16
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: uk
And if he did offer to instruct for nothing he'd be ripped to shreds for devaluing instructio so its a bit of a pointless post don't you think?

you two obviously have issues with each other and here isn't the place to air them, PM each other and sort it out in private?
Twiddle is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2006 | 15:31
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Can a non-CPL "instructor", working for free, fly a trial lesson punter who is (obviously) paying the establishment for the flight?
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2006 | 20:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: essex
Can a non-CPL "instructor", working for free, fly a trial lesson punter who is (obviously) paying the establishment for the flight?

What do you think I0540 ?

If they can then the rules are a joke, I think that you will find that if the instructor is not renumerated then it is OK but we all know the FTO is gaining commercial profit so it is a commercial flight regardless

My guess - CAA do not check and clubs don't care because they are quids in

Ethically it is unsound IMHO
unfazed is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2006 | 20:51
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
if the instructor is not renumerated then it is OK but we all know the FTO is gaining commercial profit so it is a commercial flight regardless

That is a contradictory statement. I think this would be illegal because it is aerial work even if the pilot isn't getting paid.

Are flying schools really using unpaid PPLs to take up trial lessons? That would be pretty amazing.

Back on the subject of this thread, isn't it amazing how quickly any suggestion along those lines gets bogged down in problems (real as I am sure they are) with objections from flying schools.

It's no wonder nothing ever improves in this business. They will still be teaching compass & stopwatch navigation in 2106, and the schools will be fully behind it.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2006 | 21:00
  #33 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 17
From: U.K.
No chance. A "trial lesson" is actually Excercise 3 of the PPL syllabus. The air experience flight, this is a loggable flight and therefore must be flown by an FI or FI(R)

A PPL non-FI may most certainly not fly this, whether the school is paid or not is irrelevant.

If anyone knows of any schools doing this, then get onto the CAA pronto with any evidence you may have. This is totally unacceptable and illegal.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 07:34
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
SAS the question was about a PPL INSTRUCTOR doing the flight and the answer is yes they can as you rightly point out it is lesson 3.

Be careful about being so indignant about following the rules. The vast majority of trial lessons are joy rides and never go onto learn to fly. They are steady source of income for flying schools and keep aircraft in the air that real students and regulars benefit from.
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 07:50
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
"never go onto"

without wishing to be too pedantic but

never go on and there was never any intention to go on to training - it was always a "joy ride".
Fuji Abound is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 08:03
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
Originally Posted by Fuji Abound
"never go onto"
without wishing to be too pedantic but
never go on and there was never any intention to go on to training - it was always a "joy ride".
Hmm wat ya sayin that i is thik?
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 09:26
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
Naaa

Iz a saying you are spot on and emphasing that in the majority of the cases both the instructor and "student" know darn well it is a jolly but "pretend" otherewise - cynical, what me
Fuji Abound is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 10:47
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
Originally Posted by Fuji Abound
Naaa
Iz a saying you are spot on and emphasing that in the majority of the cases both the instructor and "student" know darn well it is a jolly but "pretend" otherewise - cynical, what me
never......
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 11:13
  #39 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 17
From: U.K.
Bose, there is nothing laid down as to what ex.3 should contain. It is simply a flight to see if people are interested in learning. Why people buy them is not our concern, we are providers of training, if people don't take it up for whatever reason that is not within our control.

They are "joyrides" in the fact they are a lot of fun, but they aren't pleasure flights, they are a lesson that is loggable.

Unless of course we start vetting people beforehand for both aptitude and financial reasons... I don't think anyone would be very pleased about that!

I always brief properly, explain what it's all about and hopefully the trial lesson customer goes away with a much greater knowledge of aviation than they arrived with. That is a lesson, not a simple pleasure flight.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Reply
Old 20th November 2006 | 11:22
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
yes of course.... You keep on kidding yourself....


Originally Posted by Say again s l o w l y
Bose, there is nothing laid down as to what ex.3 should contain. It is simply a flight to see if people are interested in learning. Why people buy them is not our concern, we are providers of training, if people don't take it up for whatever reason that is not within our control.
They are "joyrides" in the fact they are a lot of fun, but they aren't pleasure flights, they are a lesson that is loggable.
Unless of course we start vetting people beforehand for both aptitude and financial reasons... I don't think anyone would be very pleased about that!
I always brief properly, explain what it's all about and hopefully the trial lesson customer goes away with a much greater knowledge of aviation than they arrived with. That is a lesson, not a simple pleasure flight.
S-Works is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.