Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Idle thought

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th September 2006 | 21:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
Idle thought

I guess many instructors and expereinced pilots are telling pilots dont fly at 2,000 but 2,200 feet because everyone else is at 2,000 feet.

Of course it begs the question that if everyone is therefore now at 2,200 feet perhaps 2,000 feet would be the best bet
Fuji Abound is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2006 | 21:27
  #2 (permalink)  

Mess Your Passage
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Temporarily Unaware......
501........

f
Flash0710 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2006 | 21:51
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 480
Likes: 3
From: Retford, UK
Probably the best bet is not to fly at a round number at all, for example 2,146 or 1,933 feet!
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2006 | 21:56
  #4 (permalink)  

Mess Your Passage
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Temporarily Unaware......
And who first tought the instructors instructor????

f
Flash0710 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2006 | 22:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: a galaxy far, far,away...
Rather depends what pressure you're on!

ap
aluminium persuader is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 00:45
  #6 (permalink)  
UV
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 665
Likes: 8
From: Essex
Yep,carry on and keep as close as you can to 2000ft.,(+- 200ft) and the rest of us will be safe!
UV
UV is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 06:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
From: Here and there. Here at the moment but soon I'll be there.
Call me old fashioned but I listen to the radio and fly at a different level to all the others in the area. Don't tell anyone though or they'll all be doing it!
SkyHawk-N is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 06:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Milton Keynes
Of course if everyone flies at the same height then you don't have to look slightly up or down for other aircraft. . . . .

This is getting silly
Laundryman is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 07:38
  #9 (permalink)  
High Flying Bird
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
From: Old Sarum ish
I vary my altitude by several hundred feet during flight. Instructors think it's cos I'm cr@p, but actually it's a cunning safety measure.
AerBabe is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 08:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: UK
Arebabe: I'm in your camp. A moving target is harder to hit! Hence I normally add a variance to my track made good too!
Darth_Bovine is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 09:43
  #11 (permalink)  
High Flying Bird
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
From: Old Sarum ish
"Straight and level"
Which would you like first?
AerBabe is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 10:13
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
If you can get out from under the London Class A, then forget about the 2200 and 1996, and go up to FL50-FL80. You'll probably have the level pretty much to yourself for 50 miles around.

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 14:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by dublinpilot
If you can get out from under the London Class A, then forget about the 2200 and 1996, and go up to FL50-FL80. You'll probably have the level pretty much to yourself for 50 miles around.
dp
Interesting thought, I've never done it in the South of England except under an IFR flight plan. If you do fly FL50-80 VFR don't you have to get airways crossing clearances every five minutes?
owenlars is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 15:43
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Haarlem
altitude

well, how about 1450 ft ?
zweef is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 16:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: UK
If we all fly in the same direction then it wont matter so much if we're all at the same altitude!
Jon Tucker is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 23:20
  #16 (permalink)  
UV
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 665
Likes: 8
From: Essex
And why isnt there an unofficial "quadrantal" "rule" under the London TMA? e.g. different levels for aircraft going east and westbound??
UV
UV is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2006 | 23:43
  #17 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: The Twilight Zone near 30W
If you're going to fly at a particular altitude whether it's 2000ft or 2100ft, try your best to fly it precisely, otherwise what's the point. If you don't want to hit anyone, look out of the window.
Human Factor is offline  
Reply
Old 8th September 2006 | 16:54
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 1
From: gone surfin'
Of course if everyone flies at the same height then you don't have to look slightly up or down for other aircraft. . . . .
Are you meant to look out of the window??
gingernut is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.