Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

How much damage to grass?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

How much damage to grass?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th July 2005 | 10:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: Oxford
How much damage to grass?

It's a long-standing ambition of mine (and of a colleague, for that matter) to land a plane on the pitches at the school where I work.

There's no problem with the quality of the surface (like a billiard table, grass mown to within a 1/4" of its life!) or the amount of room available, but how much damage would a moderately well-flown landing and take-off do to their beautiful surface, either dry as at present or when wetter? That's likely to be the main objection.

Tim

(edited to add: type could be PA28, C152 or T67 if folks reckon one is less damaging than the others!)
tmmorris is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 10:45
  #2 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Damage to grass? NONE

Damage to pocket through lack of insurance cover when you hit the goal posts? LOTS

Without wishing to sound naive, why on earth do you want to take this risk?
Monocock is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 11:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
What risk? he's already said there's plenty of room and the surface is good. It's fun to land aeroplanes in all sorts of unusual places - fields, beaches, gardens etc. - the aeroplane doesn't know it's not landing on an airfield.

To attempt to answer the question, assuming the wheels won't sink into the surface (in which case you should wait 'till it dries out before doing it), one landing and one take off should have no noticable effect on the surface.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 12:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: UK
Somewhere on the Rotorheads forum is a thread about a pilot who was prosecuted for landing on a sports field. The circumstances were different from the intention here, but it shows that there might be someone watching who would be more than willing to dump you in it with the CAA.
boomerangben is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 12:21
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
None of those are particularly short field machines, can you get a C150?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 13:03
  #6 (permalink)  
DubTrub
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
get a C150
I disagree, G. A 150 will get in...but not out. (the others just won't get in!)
 
Old 20th July 2005 | 13:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
Somewhere on the Rotorheads forum is a thread about a pilot who was prosecuted for landing on a sports field. The circumstances were different from the intention here, but it shows that there might be someone watching who would be more than willing to dump you in it with the CAA.
If he has the landowner's permisson and is not contravening any ATC restrictions and is flying within the bounds of the ANO, how could he be 'dumped in it with the CAA'?

I don't think we know the TORA or if there are any obstructions on the climbout. If these are favourable, a 152 should not be a problem.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 13:37
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Fair point, maybe a light 150 with a reasonable wind will get out (as probably will a C152), I'd not even try with any of the others.

I must admit, for something the size of a sports field, I'd rather use a suitably short field microlight - either a 912 engined flexwing, or something like a Savannah or Sky Ranger.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 13:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Metro
Have yer never been to Barton-aircraft land and take off there all the time-and it's like a BOWLING GREEN!
got caught is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 14:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Northampton
From the looks of things, as someone above mentioned so long as you attain the landowner's permission there should be no problem.

You may want to check out 'Rule 5' though - as far as I'm aware, the only exceptions to the 500' rule with regards to take-off and landing must be under the circumstances that the manoeuvre is carried out at a 'Government, Authority or Licensed aerodrome'... not a school playing field.

But that's just from what I recollect of Air Law - have a look yourself.

Cheers, Jack.
Halfbaked_Boy is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 14:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
You may want to check out 'Rule 5' though - as far as I'm aware, the only exceptions to the 500' rule with regards to take-off and landing must be under the circumstances that the manoeuvre is carried out at a 'Government, Authority or Licensed aerodrome'... not a school playing field.
That would preclude most private strips and many beaches.

I'm assuming 'sports field' isn't your average football pitch (if nit is, he'll need a helicopter). I've taken off from Hough End playing fields in Manchester in a 172 - but that is quite a big area of land and was an airfield a long time ago (but it may have been bigger back then).

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 15:38
  #12 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 12
From: Bournemouth
There are exemptions from most low-flying rules when landing or taking off in accordance with normal aviation practice.

The exception is the 1000' rule over built up areas (the 1500' as it used to be) - there is no exemption from this except at Government or licensed aerodromes. So if your approach and depature can be carried out without passing overhead a built up area, it should be no problem.

All the discussions about whether a particular type would or would not make it in and out of the field are meaningless without knowing how big the field is. Certainly my old school playing fields would have been big enough - several rugby pitches, back to back, are bigger than many grass runways once the posts are removed.

FFF
--------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 15:38
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Somewhere on the Rotorheads forum is a thread about a pilot who was prosecuted for landing on a sports field.
ISTR that he was prosecuted for landing in the carpark NOT the sports field.

Damage to field non if the field is not too wet.

If the field, permission etc is all pukka have fun. Make sure not to attract adverse attention. Not worth the headache.

You may want to check out 'Rule 5' though
You can come closer to objects etc than 500ft for take off and landing as is custom for normal aviation practice.
Flyin'Dutch' is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 16:56
  #14 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
From: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
The Banbury Helicopter Case was landing at a rugby club which the guy owns!

Irrespective of performance considerations, I would want to cover my butt legally.

i.e. As it is a sports pitch, you would probably be best advised to ensure someone on the ground has sorted out control of entry etc to the landing area as you operate in and out.
AlanM is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 17:57
  #15 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
There are several bits to Rule 5, it's probably best to read it carefully.

The 500ft rule is relaxed when taking off or landing.

The 1000ft rule (previously known as 1500ft rule) / not-over-built-up-areas rule can be relaxed for T/O and Landing at a government or licenced aerodrome. Whether it applies, or is relaxed, depends upon the class of individual aircraft.

Hence, I suspect, the slight confusion.
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 18:10
  #16 (permalink)  
BRL
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: Brighton. UK. (Via Liverpool).
When you decide to do it don't forget to inform the police/fire/ambulance people as there will be more than a few calls I suspect, to them, shortly after.............
BRL is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 19:27
  #17 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Shaggy Sheep -

I am fully aware of how fun it is to land away from airfields. I rarely land at airfields!

My point is that in this litigious world that we live in, the chances are very high that someone will not see the enjoyable side of it and make the poor chap's life hell. I sincerely hope it goes without a hitch but there is a lot to lose if something gets damaged or there are any BA pilots living nearby (they're the worst for whinging....)

If I was going to do it (and I have!) I would get written permission from the owner (council if it's a state school or trustees if it's a public school) and make sure you have it handy (and I did!)

Make sure someone is on the ground warding off dog walkers, joggers and those people who hang around half dressed in the outdoors at this time of year with their hands up each other's clothes.

Good luck

P.S The choise of a/c concerns me somewhat. Is the PA28 a slab winged 180 or a Charger? If not please be careful....
Monocock is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 19:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
The question was how much damage to the grass not about the sensibility of the action:


I have a grass strip, the only damage is done IF

the strip is soggy wet and mini-furrows are ploughed

OR

the strip is dry and max braking can cause wheel lock up and ensuing scorching, tearing out of the grass.


If the grass is a couple of inches long it does retard the aircraft more than 1/4" (?) but this works in both arrival and departure!

Hope that helps.
stiknruda is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 19:45
  #19 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
OR you could go gliding over it and not find any lift and have to land in the field
Blinkz is offline  
Old 20th July 2005 | 19:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
If I were you I would send a PM to Flying Lawyer, who knows about these things.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.