Christmas present problem !
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Christmas present problem !
Hmmm. It's happened. The thing I've been dreading for some time is upon me ... I have been given for Christmas a trial lesson in one of those things with the egg-beater on the roof.
Now, as a good little PPL(A), what are my options ?
Do I gratefully sieze the opportunity to broaden my aviation horizons ? After all, I have long admired Whirly's prose ...
Do I secretly cash in the lesson for something undoubtedly more sensible, such as being strapped naked to the upper wing of the Utterly Butterly conveyance while it explores a cold front ?
Will other pilots know what I've done ? Are there any physical manifestations which occur which will prove for ever that I've been unfaithful to my Cessna ? Will I be suddenly overtaken with the urge to shout "wokka wokka wokka" whilst whirling like a dervish in the frozen aisle at Sainsburys ?
Are there any fellow Prooners who have had this experience and recovered ?
Do tell ....
FF
Now, as a good little PPL(A), what are my options ?
Do I gratefully sieze the opportunity to broaden my aviation horizons ? After all, I have long admired Whirly's prose ...
Do I secretly cash in the lesson for something undoubtedly more sensible, such as being strapped naked to the upper wing of the Utterly Butterly conveyance while it explores a cold front ?
Will other pilots know what I've done ? Are there any physical manifestations which occur which will prove for ever that I've been unfaithful to my Cessna ? Will I be suddenly overtaken with the urge to shout "wokka wokka wokka" whilst whirling like a dervish in the frozen aisle at Sainsburys ?
Are there any fellow Prooners who have had this experience and recovered ?
Do tell ....
FF
It`ll be like the finest seduction/mistress you`ve ever had !!
Why? Because you`ll want more.... and more...and more....and you`ll enjoy it more ....etc go and enjoy, flirt a little......read Rotorheads...
Syc....
Why? Because you`ll want more.... and more...and more....and you`ll enjoy it more ....etc go and enjoy, flirt a little......read Rotorheads...
Syc....
I too was a happy little PPL(A), once.....
So close, and yet so far!
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Uk
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was treated to a trial lesson in an R22 - even though as a PPL(A) I thought that helicopters didn't even LOOK as if they were meant to fly...
I still wasn't quite sure after my first trial lesson - so I booked another - and another
So.... GO for it! It's excellent fun!!!!
GF
I still wasn't quite sure after my first trial lesson - so I booked another - and another
So.... GO for it! It's excellent fun!!!!
GF
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JAFO,
No no no! You've got it all wrong. That's not why helicopters fly. And don't anyone else tell me it's because of lift and drag and rotor thrust and all that fancy stuff either.
Helicopters, like all other aircraft, fly because of MONEY. Flying is expensive, so your wallet gets emptier, and therefore lighter, so that eventually the aircraft can fly. Fixed wing aircraft need to taxi first, and do lots of checks and so on, so that you've spent enough money to allow them to get off the ground. Helicopters, on the other hand, are so expensive that they can take off and land vertically. Twins are even more expensive; that's why they fly so fast. Microlights are pretty cheap; that's why they go so slowly. Their engines fail pretty often too...no, no, no, nothing to do with being two-stroke; it's because microlight pilots don't spend enough money, so the poor little engine sometimes can't carry all that weight. Aerobatics is possible because as soon as you turn upside down the money falls out of your pockets, so the aircraft can happily keep tumbling around the sky, getting lighter as it goes.
So now you've all taken in Whirly's Christmas lesson in basic aerodynamics (an exam will follow, of course!), I'm sure you'll understand why helicopters are absolutely safe, and why you shouldn't complain at the amount your flying school, maintenance organisation, and insurance company are charging you; it's all helping to make sure you stay airborne. 
The only reason helicopters fly is because they are so ugly that occassionally the earth repels them.
Helicopters, like all other aircraft, fly because of MONEY. Flying is expensive, so your wallet gets emptier, and therefore lighter, so that eventually the aircraft can fly. Fixed wing aircraft need to taxi first, and do lots of checks and so on, so that you've spent enough money to allow them to get off the ground. Helicopters, on the other hand, are so expensive that they can take off and land vertically. Twins are even more expensive; that's why they fly so fast. Microlights are pretty cheap; that's why they go so slowly. Their engines fail pretty often too...no, no, no, nothing to do with being two-stroke; it's because microlight pilots don't spend enough money, so the poor little engine sometimes can't carry all that weight. Aerobatics is possible because as soon as you turn upside down the money falls out of your pockets, so the aircraft can happily keep tumbling around the sky, getting lighter as it goes.
So now you've all taken in Whirly's Christmas lesson in basic aerodynamics (an exam will follow, of course!), I'm sure you'll understand why helicopters are absolutely safe, and why you shouldn't complain at the amount your flying school, maintenance organisation, and insurance company are charging you; it's all helping to make sure you stay airborne.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whirly, from your venerable perspective as an instructor, what's the hardest thing for a fixed-wing jockey to cope with on transitioning to the "dark side" ?
FF
FF
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 5 nM S of TNT, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The following used to get posted occasionally on a rotary newsgroup a few years ago. Explains the problems very well.
Best thing you will ever do!
Sort of a starter kit. First of all, there is a common misconception that helicopters can fly straight up and down with ease. While it is true that to even get airborne (under normal conditions), the helicopter must first come to a hover, it is among the most difficult and power intensive maneuvers to perform.
The helicopter’s rotor blades, like an airplane’s wing, are airfoils that produce lifting force. While the airplane must pull itself and its wings through the air to produce lift, the helicopter spins its wings around at great speed. Seems simple, and a good idea, but that is the only easy part to controlled flight in a helicopter. In order for a free standing body to spin something, it must endure an equivalent opposing force.
When the helicopter turns its rotor under a load or increases RPM, its fuselage is forced to turn in the opposite direction. Jeez...we can’t fly that way! Hmmm. Well, there are bunches of ways to counter-act torque, but the most common (read most difficult on the pilot) way is to put a tail-rotor on it. It rotates at a speed proportional to the main rotor and its thrust is adjusted as needed by changing the pitch angle of its blades. The pedals perform this function. So, when we want to yank this bird off the ground, we’d better add a goodly amount of left pedal at the same time, or we’ll turn this helicopter into a very expensive and disposable merry-go-round. No thanks.
Anyway, now that we know how to hold a heading, we’re ready to “yank” this thing off the ground, right?
By the way, what do we yank on to do that? Well, unlike in the movies, we don’t just crank the engine up until we go up. We very gently twist the motorcycle-type throttle on the end of the stick to the left of the seat.
The collective changes the pitch of all the main rotor’s blades equally and simultaneously. Pull it up for more lift, down for less. With pitch comes drag, so we must add throttle when adding pitch. Likewise, a reduction in power is needed when pitch is reduced, or the rotor will overspeed and shed a blade or two. (we need those)
O.K. We’re almost ready...almost. Once we pull pitch, add power, and add left pedal to keep from becoming dizzy, we are likely to find ourselves in a hover. It won’t be pretty, but if we remember to coordinate collective, throttle, and anti-torque pedals, we’ll be hoverin’ over one spot on the ground, right? Well, not for long, I’m afraid. The wind, any imbalance of the aircraft, and the tail-rotor’s thrust will send us off who knows which direction. (I knew that damn tail-rotor would be trouble)
Well, we need another “stick”, so we’ll put it right here between our legs. (seems natural enough, and we’ll need a pacifier amidst all this confusion) This one will change the pitch of the blades at certain points in their rotation, or cyclicly. Its effect is to add lift to one side of the rotor system and decrease it on the opposite side, thereby tilting the whole rotor disc in the desired direction of travel.
We won’t get into a thing called
“gyroscopic precession” right now, but suffice to say that we’ll have to be careful to set the mechanism that tells the rotor blades when to change pitch (swashplate) so that if we push forward on the new stick—the cyclic— we get forward tilt on the rotor. Assuming we have a powerful enough engine to overcome the weight of the machine and the drag of the fuselage and other “parasitic” components plus the significant amount of power needed to operate the tail-rotor, we should be good to go.
Engine running at idle and rotor clutch engaged, we need to slowly bring the rotor to takeoff RPM—typically around 450 in a small bird. It takes very little power to do this with no pitch on the blades, so we have gobs of throttle left, even though we can’t hear ourselves think already. (headsets are not optional in helicopters).
Now, carefully and very slowly raise the collective until you notice the RPM start to fall. This shouldn’t take long. Add just enough throttle to bring the RPM back up. You soon realize that you can raise the collective and add throttle in the same movement—sort of like doing a curl with your forearm.
Now that we’re getting light, we have to make sure that the cyclic is centered at an equilibrium of lift around the rotor disc, and that the tail-rotor is also equalizing torque—no more, no less. We want to maintain this equilibrium at least until we are in a hover and decide to go some-where. If the tail-rotor is producing to much/too little thrust, we will start to spin, which can induce other problems. :-) If the main rotor is not in equilibrium, we can strike the tail-rotor on the ground or even roll over. You sure you want to do this?
O.K. Here we go!
As soon as we get off the ground we notice a tendency for the helicopter to drift to the right due to the tail-rotor’s thrust, so a little left cyclic pressure is necessary to stay over one spot. I say pressure because that’s all it takes. Much more than that and the helicopter will go too far to the left and slip off the “cushion” of high-pressure air it is producing under the rotor and will settle to the ground if power is not added. Not only that, but a series of pilot-induced oscillations on all axes may develop. Let’s say that we move the cyclic to the left to correct for tail-rotor drift, and have to suddenly move it back to the right to correct for the over-correction. Now we find ourselves swinging back and forth to an increasing and alarming extent. This is due to the helicopter’s mass acting as a pendulum under the spinning rotor, which tends to stay put much like a spinning top. This is appropriately called “pendular effect”.
Not to over-complicate things, but pendular effect is not the worst thing to deal with when in a hover.
Let’s say that we experience tail-rotor drift and correct for it using left cyclic pressure. Although the rotor is still producing the same amount of thrust, we have just converted some of that lifting thrust (called “lift component”) to lateral thrust (“thrust component”) by tilting the rotor disc slightly. To avoid settling to the ground, we must add some lift component by adding collective and simultaneously adding enough throttle to maintain rotor RPM. While doing that we notice that the nose of the helicopter wants to go to the right due to the increase in torque, so we add some left pedal pressure, which stops the nose from moving, but since the tail rotor needed more power to do that, and it doesn’t have its own engine, we had to steal some power from the main rotor. (Ya faller me?) Now that the rotor has less power, the heli-copter wants to settle to the ground again, so we need to add more collective and more throttle and more pedal... now you’re too high! Uh oh! Less collective! Less power! Right pedal! Now you’re drifting to the left due to less thrust from the tail rotor! Watch that rotor RPM!
Better get outa this hover and away
from the ground where its safe!
Now here’s the fun part. Gently feed forward cyclic pressure and simultaneous collective/throttle (and don’t forget left pedal) until we begin to gain forward speed. Now we just lost two good things:
Ground effect, which is that cushion I mentioned, and lift component since we tilted the rotor forward.
Just add some collective/throttle to keep from digging a hole, and the appropriate amount of pedal to hold heading. We quickly gain forward speed until we gain a good thing to replace the two good things we just lost: translational lift. Translational lift is what people are referring to when they say that a helicopter’s rotor system acts like a wing in forward flight. Kinda sorta, but not exactly. It flies much the same but not because of wing-like properties. It is simply because the helicopter now has a constant supply of “still” air to climb upon, rather than sitting in its own accelerated column of air. We can either choose to nose over a bit more or reduce power and stay near the ground to accelerate some more, or let the helicopter climb with its newfound extra rotor efficiency—its your choice. (O.K., we skimmed the ground ‘cause its fun.) The easiest part of all needs little explanation. Just do all the same stuff you do in an airplane plus watch your rotor RPM. When you want to turn, give it a little pedal to coordinate. Hold speed by holding attitude with the cyclic, hold altitude with the collective. Easy, huh? There’s a little more to it, but you might not notice it while in flight. Some things change with speed, and some mostly sub-conscious corrections need to be made, but there are limits to sub-conscious flight techniques. The following paragraph is optional reading for those who only want a very basic explanation of helicopter flight.
(this involves math) :-)
Due to the rotor spinning rapidly, and the helicopter as a whole moving forward, we have to deal with “dissymmetry of lift”. Dissymmetry of lift comes from one side of the rotating rotor disc moving into the direction of travel of the helicopter, and the other side moving away from it. The net effect is to add the speed of the helicopter to the rotor’s rotational speed on the advancing side, and conversely to subtract the forward speed of the helicopter from the retreating side of the rotor.
If the rotor has a rotational speed of
400 MPH at the tips, and the helicopter is traveling at 100 MPH through the air, the net speed of the advancing side of the rotor is 500 MPH. Under the same conditions, the net speed of the retreating side is 300 MPH. If an airplane tried to run its right wing through the air at 500 MPH and run its left wing through the air at 300 MPH, it would be doing snap-rolls until it crashed. Dissymmetry of lift is the primary obstacle the helicopter faces in significantly improving on current top speed records.
Above the approved top speed of a helicopter, the rotor blades are alternately experiencing the extremes of Mach buffet, and of reverse flow...450 times a minute. The resulting rapid oscillation of center of pressure on each blade can lead to catastrophic rotor system failure. The vibration is a warning.
The control effect as speed increases is that the helicopter rolls towards the retreating side, and is corrected by adjusting cyclic pressure against the roll. This is done without much thinking except to re-trim the cyclic when speed changes significantly.
Another change that isn’t really noticed is that the tail-rotor doesn’t need to work as hard at higher speeds due to the weather vane effect of the tail boom. Airfoils are often placed on the boom to unload the tail-rotor at high speed/high power settings and free up power for lift/thrust.
This is boring as hell, so now we’re going to land somewhere...anywhere. See any place you want to stop and have a picnic? How ‘bout that little pond with the ducks and the waterfall tucked into that gorge? Let’s land on that sand bar. This is one place where those fixed-wingers won’t bother us.
Losing speed and altitude is basically the reverse process of gaining them. To hold altitude and lose speed you ease back on the cyclic to flare and reduce speed while lowering collective/throttle just enough to hold altitude and maintain rotor RPM. To lose altitude without losing speed, lower collective/throttle until the desired rate of decent is reached. A combination of both is usually used for approach to landing.
At the point of loss of translational lift, the rotor system will vibrate a bit, but you’re used to it by now (you’ll be a bit numb by the end of the flight). Besides, you’ll be somewhat distracted by the sinking feeling, followed by the confusion of having the nose suddenly jerk to the right when you yank up on the collective to stop sinking. (forgot that left pedal again, eh?) Anyway, when you’ve established a hover (hopefully in ground effect and over a clean, level spot) you can decrease collective until touching the ground. That was an over-simplification, but you get the idea. Now we can eat. Don’t freak out too badly when you notice those wires—damn close, but you’re alive!
Best thing you will ever do!
Sort of a starter kit. First of all, there is a common misconception that helicopters can fly straight up and down with ease. While it is true that to even get airborne (under normal conditions), the helicopter must first come to a hover, it is among the most difficult and power intensive maneuvers to perform.
The helicopter’s rotor blades, like an airplane’s wing, are airfoils that produce lifting force. While the airplane must pull itself and its wings through the air to produce lift, the helicopter spins its wings around at great speed. Seems simple, and a good idea, but that is the only easy part to controlled flight in a helicopter. In order for a free standing body to spin something, it must endure an equivalent opposing force.
When the helicopter turns its rotor under a load or increases RPM, its fuselage is forced to turn in the opposite direction. Jeez...we can’t fly that way! Hmmm. Well, there are bunches of ways to counter-act torque, but the most common (read most difficult on the pilot) way is to put a tail-rotor on it. It rotates at a speed proportional to the main rotor and its thrust is adjusted as needed by changing the pitch angle of its blades. The pedals perform this function. So, when we want to yank this bird off the ground, we’d better add a goodly amount of left pedal at the same time, or we’ll turn this helicopter into a very expensive and disposable merry-go-round. No thanks.
Anyway, now that we know how to hold a heading, we’re ready to “yank” this thing off the ground, right?
By the way, what do we yank on to do that? Well, unlike in the movies, we don’t just crank the engine up until we go up. We very gently twist the motorcycle-type throttle on the end of the stick to the left of the seat.
The collective changes the pitch of all the main rotor’s blades equally and simultaneously. Pull it up for more lift, down for less. With pitch comes drag, so we must add throttle when adding pitch. Likewise, a reduction in power is needed when pitch is reduced, or the rotor will overspeed and shed a blade or two. (we need those)
O.K. We’re almost ready...almost. Once we pull pitch, add power, and add left pedal to keep from becoming dizzy, we are likely to find ourselves in a hover. It won’t be pretty, but if we remember to coordinate collective, throttle, and anti-torque pedals, we’ll be hoverin’ over one spot on the ground, right? Well, not for long, I’m afraid. The wind, any imbalance of the aircraft, and the tail-rotor’s thrust will send us off who knows which direction. (I knew that damn tail-rotor would be trouble)
Well, we need another “stick”, so we’ll put it right here between our legs. (seems natural enough, and we’ll need a pacifier amidst all this confusion) This one will change the pitch of the blades at certain points in their rotation, or cyclicly. Its effect is to add lift to one side of the rotor system and decrease it on the opposite side, thereby tilting the whole rotor disc in the desired direction of travel.
We won’t get into a thing called
“gyroscopic precession” right now, but suffice to say that we’ll have to be careful to set the mechanism that tells the rotor blades when to change pitch (swashplate) so that if we push forward on the new stick—the cyclic— we get forward tilt on the rotor. Assuming we have a powerful enough engine to overcome the weight of the machine and the drag of the fuselage and other “parasitic” components plus the significant amount of power needed to operate the tail-rotor, we should be good to go.
Engine running at idle and rotor clutch engaged, we need to slowly bring the rotor to takeoff RPM—typically around 450 in a small bird. It takes very little power to do this with no pitch on the blades, so we have gobs of throttle left, even though we can’t hear ourselves think already. (headsets are not optional in helicopters).
Now, carefully and very slowly raise the collective until you notice the RPM start to fall. This shouldn’t take long. Add just enough throttle to bring the RPM back up. You soon realize that you can raise the collective and add throttle in the same movement—sort of like doing a curl with your forearm.
Now that we’re getting light, we have to make sure that the cyclic is centered at an equilibrium of lift around the rotor disc, and that the tail-rotor is also equalizing torque—no more, no less. We want to maintain this equilibrium at least until we are in a hover and decide to go some-where. If the tail-rotor is producing to much/too little thrust, we will start to spin, which can induce other problems. :-) If the main rotor is not in equilibrium, we can strike the tail-rotor on the ground or even roll over. You sure you want to do this?
O.K. Here we go!
As soon as we get off the ground we notice a tendency for the helicopter to drift to the right due to the tail-rotor’s thrust, so a little left cyclic pressure is necessary to stay over one spot. I say pressure because that’s all it takes. Much more than that and the helicopter will go too far to the left and slip off the “cushion” of high-pressure air it is producing under the rotor and will settle to the ground if power is not added. Not only that, but a series of pilot-induced oscillations on all axes may develop. Let’s say that we move the cyclic to the left to correct for tail-rotor drift, and have to suddenly move it back to the right to correct for the over-correction. Now we find ourselves swinging back and forth to an increasing and alarming extent. This is due to the helicopter’s mass acting as a pendulum under the spinning rotor, which tends to stay put much like a spinning top. This is appropriately called “pendular effect”.
Not to over-complicate things, but pendular effect is not the worst thing to deal with when in a hover.
Let’s say that we experience tail-rotor drift and correct for it using left cyclic pressure. Although the rotor is still producing the same amount of thrust, we have just converted some of that lifting thrust (called “lift component”) to lateral thrust (“thrust component”) by tilting the rotor disc slightly. To avoid settling to the ground, we must add some lift component by adding collective and simultaneously adding enough throttle to maintain rotor RPM. While doing that we notice that the nose of the helicopter wants to go to the right due to the increase in torque, so we add some left pedal pressure, which stops the nose from moving, but since the tail rotor needed more power to do that, and it doesn’t have its own engine, we had to steal some power from the main rotor. (Ya faller me?) Now that the rotor has less power, the heli-copter wants to settle to the ground again, so we need to add more collective and more throttle and more pedal... now you’re too high! Uh oh! Less collective! Less power! Right pedal! Now you’re drifting to the left due to less thrust from the tail rotor! Watch that rotor RPM!
Better get outa this hover and away
from the ground where its safe!
Now here’s the fun part. Gently feed forward cyclic pressure and simultaneous collective/throttle (and don’t forget left pedal) until we begin to gain forward speed. Now we just lost two good things:
Ground effect, which is that cushion I mentioned, and lift component since we tilted the rotor forward.
Just add some collective/throttle to keep from digging a hole, and the appropriate amount of pedal to hold heading. We quickly gain forward speed until we gain a good thing to replace the two good things we just lost: translational lift. Translational lift is what people are referring to when they say that a helicopter’s rotor system acts like a wing in forward flight. Kinda sorta, but not exactly. It flies much the same but not because of wing-like properties. It is simply because the helicopter now has a constant supply of “still” air to climb upon, rather than sitting in its own accelerated column of air. We can either choose to nose over a bit more or reduce power and stay near the ground to accelerate some more, or let the helicopter climb with its newfound extra rotor efficiency—its your choice. (O.K., we skimmed the ground ‘cause its fun.) The easiest part of all needs little explanation. Just do all the same stuff you do in an airplane plus watch your rotor RPM. When you want to turn, give it a little pedal to coordinate. Hold speed by holding attitude with the cyclic, hold altitude with the collective. Easy, huh? There’s a little more to it, but you might not notice it while in flight. Some things change with speed, and some mostly sub-conscious corrections need to be made, but there are limits to sub-conscious flight techniques. The following paragraph is optional reading for those who only want a very basic explanation of helicopter flight.
(this involves math) :-)
Due to the rotor spinning rapidly, and the helicopter as a whole moving forward, we have to deal with “dissymmetry of lift”. Dissymmetry of lift comes from one side of the rotating rotor disc moving into the direction of travel of the helicopter, and the other side moving away from it. The net effect is to add the speed of the helicopter to the rotor’s rotational speed on the advancing side, and conversely to subtract the forward speed of the helicopter from the retreating side of the rotor.
If the rotor has a rotational speed of
400 MPH at the tips, and the helicopter is traveling at 100 MPH through the air, the net speed of the advancing side of the rotor is 500 MPH. Under the same conditions, the net speed of the retreating side is 300 MPH. If an airplane tried to run its right wing through the air at 500 MPH and run its left wing through the air at 300 MPH, it would be doing snap-rolls until it crashed. Dissymmetry of lift is the primary obstacle the helicopter faces in significantly improving on current top speed records.
Above the approved top speed of a helicopter, the rotor blades are alternately experiencing the extremes of Mach buffet, and of reverse flow...450 times a minute. The resulting rapid oscillation of center of pressure on each blade can lead to catastrophic rotor system failure. The vibration is a warning.
The control effect as speed increases is that the helicopter rolls towards the retreating side, and is corrected by adjusting cyclic pressure against the roll. This is done without much thinking except to re-trim the cyclic when speed changes significantly.
Another change that isn’t really noticed is that the tail-rotor doesn’t need to work as hard at higher speeds due to the weather vane effect of the tail boom. Airfoils are often placed on the boom to unload the tail-rotor at high speed/high power settings and free up power for lift/thrust.
This is boring as hell, so now we’re going to land somewhere...anywhere. See any place you want to stop and have a picnic? How ‘bout that little pond with the ducks and the waterfall tucked into that gorge? Let’s land on that sand bar. This is one place where those fixed-wingers won’t bother us.
Losing speed and altitude is basically the reverse process of gaining them. To hold altitude and lose speed you ease back on the cyclic to flare and reduce speed while lowering collective/throttle just enough to hold altitude and maintain rotor RPM. To lose altitude without losing speed, lower collective/throttle until the desired rate of decent is reached. A combination of both is usually used for approach to landing.
At the point of loss of translational lift, the rotor system will vibrate a bit, but you’re used to it by now (you’ll be a bit numb by the end of the flight). Besides, you’ll be somewhat distracted by the sinking feeling, followed by the confusion of having the nose suddenly jerk to the right when you yank up on the collective to stop sinking. (forgot that left pedal again, eh?) Anyway, when you’ve established a hover (hopefully in ground effect and over a clean, level spot) you can decrease collective until touching the ground. That was an over-simplification, but you get the idea. Now we can eat. Don’t freak out too badly when you notice those wires—damn close, but you’re alive!
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,598
Received 452 Likes
on
240 Posts
"Hovering, hovering, and hovering."
Oh-oh! Whirly is trying the old instructor trick. Tell a man that it is difficult to hover then he'll find it difficult but still want to do it. Fits right in with her "money makes helicopters fly" theory. You'll have to keep spending more money until you have convinced yourself that it's actually easy. Might take hours!
I never found it difficult to hover. I just kept going to bigger fields until it felt like I was over one spot...
One day I'll have to get Whirly to teach me how to do it properly.
Oh-oh! Whirly is trying the old instructor trick. Tell a man that it is difficult to hover then he'll find it difficult but still want to do it. Fits right in with her "money makes helicopters fly" theory. You'll have to keep spending more money until you have convinced yourself that it's actually easy. Might take hours!
I never found it difficult to hover. I just kept going to bigger fields until it felt like I was over one spot...
One day I'll have to get Whirly to teach me how to do it properly.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bletchley
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was treated to half an hour in an R22 before I had my PPL. I'll sling my two penneth and join the ranks of those recommending that you give it a go. Forget the maths involved in what'ts going on above your head - its was almost exhilerating as my first winch launch
Happy flying
bletchleytugie
Happy flying
bletchleytugie
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,598
Received 452 Likes
on
240 Posts
Another one - hooked already!
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,598
Received 452 Likes
on
240 Posts
Whirly,
Have you seen my sunglasses then, by any chance? A few other people have commented on them, too!
There are some schemes to wean addicts off helis, but they seldom work. Unfortunately, they mainly involve the use of a less addictive substitute. Plank, I think the slang word is. They try to make it more attractive to the victims by doing aeros and stuff, but it really isn't the same as the fruits of the rotree and most fall back into it at some stage or another.
Have you seen my sunglasses then, by any chance? A few other people have commented on them, too!
There are some schemes to wean addicts off helis, but they seldom work. Unfortunately, they mainly involve the use of a less addictive substitute. Plank, I think the slang word is. They try to make it more attractive to the victims by doing aeros and stuff, but it really isn't the same as the fruits of the rotree and most fall back into it at some stage or another.
