EASA-FCL is coming! Get your comments in!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Popham
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For example the 3rd country question, I am assuming refers to FAA and equivalent type aircraft?
therefore yes, I read 3rd country as 'N' reg, and FAA licences when it is used. I assume they use '3rd' as they are thinking that 1st and 2nd would be from one EASA country in another EASA country, leaving countries such as the USA being '3rd countries'.
Also, the other term is STAKEHOLDER - this means YOU! (anyone potentially effected by EASA)
(GK430 and 'rubber stamps') - I do know EXACTLY what you mean, it is a worry and of course discussion is somewhat directed by the questions they have asked, but on certain 'fronts' (eg; recreational flying and medicals) they might really be looking for an excuse NOT to get involved and may want to show 'x' % of feedback agreed - lesson learned from JAR perhaps which I think was an acknowledged mistake to cover recreational stuff, hence our NPPL soon after.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Who cares? ;-)
Age: 74
Posts: 676
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, the other term is STAKEHOLDER - this means YOU
Westy
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Popham
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
isn't there a different expression that can be suggested?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Popham
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having lived in France a while back I was very suspicious that if anyone downloaded the '.doc' comment form then just deleted the logo (thereby reducing the size down from approx 500KB to 15KB for retransmission back, the powers that be would not accept it as it was "no longer their form". (Some might think this suspicion is odd, but Believe me, that would have happened in France when I lived there!).
So I checked, and this morning received an email from them apologising and saying that the logo can be deleted and still be acceptable. (I notice they didn't say they'd delete it at the source - so I have asked them to amend that for a smaller logo now!)
Irv
So I checked, and this morning received an email from them apologising and saying that the logo can be deleted and still be acceptable. (I notice they didn't say they'd delete it at the source - so I have asked them to amend that for a smaller logo now!)
Irv
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Popham
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
same day service!:
Dear Mr. Lee,
As asked I've put a new, smaller logo into the form. Now, it should only take a few seconds to download the doc.
Best regards
IT Assistant
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Rue de Genève, 12, off. 2/17 B-1049 Evere
Dear Mr. Lee,
As asked I've put a new, smaller logo into the form. Now, it should only take a few seconds to download the doc.
Best regards
IT Assistant
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Rue de Genève, 12, off. 2/17 B-1049 Evere
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only a few days left.....
I have just seen this on the Flyer forum (dont always have access to the internet in my job!), and was goint to start a new thread, but found this old thread with search.
So, Just to remind everyone that the closing date for comments is 31st July, so if you dont know about it or still have something to say, you need to get your finger out!!
Check out the EASA Consultation proceedure and have your say before its too late!!
Regards, SD..
So, Just to remind everyone that the closing date for comments is 31st July, so if you dont know about it or still have something to say, you need to get your finger out!!
Check out the EASA Consultation proceedure and have your say before its too late!!
Regards, SD..