Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Disappointing Magazine articles

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Disappointing Magazine articles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Sep 2003, 20:49
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bath
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shaggy Sheep Driver

Despite the amount of pies I eat I don't think I could be called a 'Mega corporation' (yet) :-)

We found out this morning that the printers screwed up big time with the subs copies. To cut a long story short they weren't despatched as they should have been on Tuesday.

They are, as we speak (Friday lunchtime), being sealed and posted (1st class) by a bunch of red faced, sore ar*ed people in Kent.

Big apologies from Seager Towers, home of the mega pie, but not mega corporation :-)

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2003, 21:04
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
red faced, sore ar*ed people in Kent
I was led to believe that most people living in Kent have this problem.



MJ
mad_jock is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2003, 21:21
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ian - 'number' of pies, not 'amount' of pies. You'd better get one of the many editorial staff from Seager Towers to sub your posts ;~)

So, if you actually do enjoy the freedom in print that used to be exercised by James, that's an advantage to you that is no longer available to 'Pilot'. Or have those non-PC days gone?

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2003, 21:24
  #44 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
hmmm...years ago (25+) I would inhale every word of every flying mag I could lay my hands on...as the years role on, and the hours of hard won experience pile up I find I don't read any of them regularly...most not at all.

Articles are, imo, usually very 'light on' in most respects. Soft subjects covered in a way that suggests the writer really doesn't have THAT much direct experience. Flight reports on specific aircraft are almost not worth reading because you can just tell that they are mostly free advertising.

Then you read someone like Farley and his ilk and they are rivetting...because the depth of knowledge/experience is obvious.

John Deakins articles, on Avweb, are similarly rivetting because he's expert and he calls a spade a f**king spade.

Basically, and not unlike Pprune in some respects, if you took every flying mag for the last five years and read them back to back you'd discover there's about 14 topics that get rerun every year. Every Autumn the cold weather articles and every spring the TS/windshear articles in US Flying for instance.

Chuck.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2003, 23:08
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilotage did send me a pm stating some of the difficulties he had in compiling the 450 kg microlight article I referred to which was nice of him. He stressed the fear of companies taking legal action several times - as he has in this thread.

My response is what a load of boll**ks!

Legal action only works when what is written is defamatory or intended to damage. If it is factually correct then any legal action can be laughed at.

I suspect it is much much more about advertising. Disgrunted manufacturer does not advertise latest wonderplane which in 5 years time is no longer a microlight in magazine that highlights this fact? I doubt that individually it could have much effect, but given that so many of these machines are so limited the cumulative effect could be quite large. It is the editorial fear of cutting a revenue line that I suspect largely determines the near total lack of criticism of anything produced by people who sell things. Which was something Pilot certainly was not scared of in the past.

Then of course there are the 'flight tests' where having praised the flying properties of this excellent machine, coincidence, coincidence it is for sale..........
gasax is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2003, 23:27
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't topgear go down this route.

Although they dodn't have advertising to worry about.

They seem to slate quite a few cars and have no problems.

MJ
mad_jock is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2003, 00:00
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Clarkson did it before he was famous. It was when he worked for a car mag (Autocar?? don't really know which one) and got pis*ed off by the circus where you write a rave review of (say) Ford's latest, and in return they advertise in your mag and invite the journos to exotic locations for 'test sessions'.

Clarkson broke the mould and wrote the truth about some abominable car or other. The advertising still came in, and JC still got his invites to places nice.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.