PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) (https://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf-self-loading-freight-61/)
-   -   Odds n Sods (https://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf-self-loading-freight/650076-odds-n-sods.html)

justapax 30th May 2024 22:55

I've just discovered that some of my posts in 2000 are still on this forum, although the threads are long since locked. I was 'justapax' then, I had to choose a new username as I couldn't remember what email address I had 24 years ago. There were comments back then along the lines of 'do we really need to encourage Pax & SLF in the *professional* pilots rumour network?' from professional pilots. 24 years later - plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

I was hoping back then to be able to fly in a Connie, the first aircraft I ever flew in (boy was it *noisy*). At that time there were no airworthy Connies and I hoped to buy one, they were going for scrap value. Then I discovered their thirst for fuel. Well, in 2024, you can actually fly in a Connie, you just have to go to Australia to do so. I'm saving up my pennies for the airfare. I'll never get the chance to fly in the other aircraft I flew in as a child, such as the Caravelle, Vickers Viscount, Vickers Vanguard, Comet 4B and VC10, as AFAIK there are no airworthy examples left of any of these. But the Connie flies on.

I spent most of the intervening 24 years having cancer, and having various bits of me cut out, followed by chemotherapy, repeat and resume. Does anyone else have as long a pause between their last post on pprune.org and resuming?

S.o.S. 31st May 2024 11:27

Hello Justa... and welcome back. That is a long gap but great that you found your way back (and were able to). We are fortunate that the archive has survived the change of ownership and - yes - some topics do come round the loop. Some of us then sit back and watch the newcomers views and see if they have changed.

Asturias56 1st June 2024 07:33

Indeed - look a the "Future Aircraft Carrier " thread started by WE Branch Fanatic on 10th Apr 2006 and he still manages at least a page a week on the benefits of carrieraviation :ok:

S.o.S. 1st June 2024 12:25

Yes A56. You could say that 'WE' is known to the Mods ...

PAXboy 21st June 2024 12:38


The ‘Letter of Invitation’ takes weeks to obtain, and is one of many Brexit hurdles the UK insisted on applying to its citizens
The Independent
After the UK voted to leave the European Union in 2016, negotiators in Brussels acquiesced to our insistence that we should be “third-country nationals”. Brexit means British travellers face much higher hurdles for any trip to the EU and wider Schengen Area.

On arrival at a Schengen frontier, each British passport must be examined and stamped. Officials need to ensure the traveller has not spent too much time in the EU recently (a maximum of 90 days in any 180 days).

They must also be satisfied that the traveller has sufficient financial resources and will return to the UK (or continue to a non-EU country) after a short visit.

Each European Union nation can choose its own subsistence criteria for admitting British travellers – and also impose requirements on accommodation. Spain requires anyone staying with friends or family to obtain a Carta de Invitación (Letter of Invitation). The process can take weeks, and the official document costs over £70. But without it you may be turned away at the border.

netstruggler 21st June 2024 13:58


Originally Posted by Justapax1 (Post 11666640)
I've just discovered that some of my posts in 2000 are still on this forum, although the threads are long since locked. I was 'justapax' then, I had to choose a new username as I couldn't remember what email address I had 24 years ago. There were comments back then along the lines of 'do we really need to encourage Pax & SLF in the *professional* pilots rumour network?' from professional pilots. 24 years later - plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

I was hoping back then to be able to fly in a Connie, the first aircraft I ever flew in (boy was it *noisy*). At that time there were no airworthy Connies and I hoped to buy one, they were going for scrap value. Then I discovered their thirst for fuel. Well, in 2024, you can actually fly in a Connie, you just have to go to Australia to do so. I'm saving up my pennies for the airfare. I'll never get the chance to fly in the other aircraft I flew in as a child, such as the Caravelle, Vickers Viscount, Vickers Vanguard, Comet 4B and VC10, as AFAIK there are no airworthy examples left of any of these. But the Connie flies on.

I spent most of the intervening 24 years having cancer, and having various bits of me cut out, followed by chemotherapy, repeat and resume. Does anyone else have as long a pause between their last post on pprune.org and resuming?

My very first flight was on a Caravelle, in the late 1960s. Sat in the last row at the back which was windowless and very loud, presumably because the Rolls Royce engine was bolted on where the window should have been.

PAXboy 21st June 2024 19:59

Same with the VC10. I remember being in the toilets at the back. You could have murdered a dozen people with a hatchet and no one would have heard.

justapax 21st June 2024 20:16


Originally Posted by PAXboy (Post 11681466)
Same with the VC10. I remember being in the toilets at the back. You could have murdered a dozen people with a hatchet and no one would have heard.

If you had a dozen people in the toilets of a VC10, there wouldn't have been room to swing a hatchet.

Even though the engines were at the back, I remember VC10s as being quite loud, and they seemed to have lower pressurisation than other aircraft of the era.

Has anyone flown in the Ilyushin Il-62, which was so similar that there have been mutterings of 'stolen blueprints'? Air Koryo still has one flying.

ZFT 22nd June 2024 06:25


Originally Posted by Justapax1 (Post 11681475)
If you had a dozen people in the toilets of a VC10, there wouldn't have been room to swing a hatchet.

Even though the engines were at the back, I remember VC10s as being quite loud, and they seemed to have lower pressurisation than other aircraft of the era.

Has anyone flown in the Ilyushin Il-62, which was so similar that there have been mutterings of 'stolen blueprints'? Air Koryo still has one flying.

Flew in Il-62s often in the 70s and early 80s. All I recall is curtained windows and unpleasant hostesses.

Bug 22nd June 2024 06:42

I flew in IL-62 in 1977. I was down back area. Most vivid memory was how cold it was in rear of cabin, and how hot in front area.
Cabin crew not seen after takeoff.
Also noted an anti CofG tipping extra leg/prop extended at rear of aircraft as we disembarked.

BonnieLass 22nd June 2024 08:27

When I was a kid, we went to Spain on holiday aboard one of my all time favourites, Trident. Dad always chose the seats that were facing each other cos he said it was easier to keep an eye on myself and my sisters. Mother was always terrified of flying so sat in one of the rear facing seats as she thought it would be better not to see where she was going. On the way home we had the same sort of seating with souvenir donkeys and sombreros on the spare seats.

I don't think any other aircraft had the facing seat setup, but probably wrong on that.

PAXboy 22nd June 2024 12:36

As I recall, there was an experiment to see pax reaction to aft facing seats. The reason being that - in an impact, people are better protected because the head will be thrown up and into the headrest. With forward facing, you have to prevent that by gripping knees etc.

In December 1975 I was on a Trident LHR-HAM (an ex BEA unit, of course) and they had a number of rear facing seats at the front of the cabin. I was asked if I would sit in one and fill in a questionnaire at the end of the flight. I did and said it was fine, which it was.

As I further recall, pax rejected the rear-facing seat for various reasons. Despite the fact that, on busses you might sight sideways to direction of travel and on trains you might be in a rearward facing seat!!

In all RAF transport aircraft set for troop carrying they ONLY have rear facing seats for safety.

Mr Mac 22nd June 2024 14:43

BinnieLass
The Comet had a similar set of seats.

Cheers
Mr Mac

Asturias56 22nd June 2024 17:06

As I further recall, pax rejected the rear-facing seat for various reasons.

Actually it as mainly the airlines - rear facing seats weighed more IIRC

PAXboy 15th July 2024 11:00

‘Kiss and fly’ airport charges continue to increase as drivers pay £7 to stop for a minute
The RAC, which carried out the study, said it is ‘bordering on the ridiculous’


More than a third of major airports have raised drop-off fees for drivers in the past year, new research has shown.

Seven out of 20 airports analysed have raised so-called “kiss and fly” charges – which are typically levied for dropping off someone as close to a terminal as possible – since last summer.

The RAC, which carried out the study, said it is “bordering on the ridiculous” for drivers to pay up to £7 for “the briefest of stops”.

The four which have increased fees by £1 are Gatwick (which now charges £6 for 10 minutes), Edinburgh (£5 for 10 minutes), Birmingham (£5 for 15 minutes) and Bristol (£6 for 10 minutes).

Three others – Glasgow, Leeds Bradford and Aberdeen – have raised their prices by 50p.

Despite not raising its price this year, Stansted continues to top the table for the most expensive drop-off cost. The Essex airport’s initial fee is £7 for 15 minutes.

A total of nine airports have frozen their prices this year.

That includes Manchester, which offers the worst value among all major airports by charging £5 for just a five-minute stay.

Heathrow, the UK’s busiest airport, charges the same amount but with no time limit.

The Independent

This should be no surprise. People want to imagine they are getting a low priced flight, irrespective of carrier.

Hartington 15th July 2024 13:36

I went on a British Eagle Britannia fitted throughout with rear facing seats. I believe it was a requirement of the MoD at the time for trooping contracts.

I have this recollection that Southwest had a row of rear facing seats in their very early 737-200s.

Asturias56 16th July 2024 07:24

"I believe it was a requirement of the MoD at the time for trooping contracts."

Correct

LGWAlan 16th July 2024 12:21


Originally Posted by BonnieLass (Post 11681692)
When I was a kid, we went to Spain on holiday aboard one of my all time favourites, Trident. Dad always chose the seats that were facing each other cos he said it was easier to keep an eye on myself and my sisters. Mother was always terrified of flying so sat in one of the rear facing seats as she thought it would be better not to see where she was going. On the way home we had the same sort of seating with souvenir donkeys and sombreros on the spare seats.

I don't think any other aircraft had the facing seat setup, but probably wrong on that.

Dan Air1-11 definitely did - we had them on my first ever IT charter flight - MAN-MAH July 1986

PAXboy 6th August 2024 16:11

Some may have alrerady experienced this as reported in The Independent. Start date is slightly confusing.

EU to reintroduce 100ml liquids rule at airport security as travellers warned of lengthy delays

Airports Council International expect ‘significant operational strain’ at European airports

Travellers flying to and from Europe this autumn may face lengthy delays as security liquid limits are reinstated at aviation hubs. Liquids, aerosols and gels (LAGs), as well as pastes, lotions and cosmetics, must be 100ml at all EU airports from 1 September 2024.

The European Commission announced it will “temporarily” reintroduce the restriction on liquids carried in hand luggage on 31 July. No container for any LAG can be above 100ml, and at most airports must be carried within a resealable clear plastic bag with a maximum volume of one litre.

Alsacienne 6th August 2024 18:16

Thought it had never gone away!! Still packing little liquids into the right-sized sealable clear plastic bag!!!

PAXboy 7th August 2024 11:32

Why is Japan cracking down on rideable motorised suitcases?
My emphasis in red

A growing number of airports are imposing restrictions on these electric suitcases over safety concerns.

Rideable motorised suitcases, which emerged almost 10 years ago as something futuristically novel as well as functional, have increasingly become popular among travellers.

But the rideable suitcase craze is getting pushback in some Japanese airports because of safety concerns and due to some foreign visitors using them illegally on public roads.
Many of these rideable suitcases can reach maximum speeds of 13 kilometres per hour (8 miles per hour). That’s the equivalent of the average running speed for a moderately fit jogger.

Singapore Changi Airport has banned the suitcases entirely.
aljazeera

Asturias56 8th August 2024 07:53

"Singapore Changi Airport has banned the suitcases entirely."

After a walk of over a km from the Lounge to the gate at Changi on our last visit I was thinking of taking roller skates for my next trip

PAXboy 9th August 2024 11:17

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....dbc04eaf60.jpg

S.o.S. 24th August 2024 12:22

An article in an upmarket travel magazine talks about three towns introducing Tourist taxes, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole. They draw a parallel with Venice, lake Como, Brussels and parts of Japan.

I distinctly recall hotels charging a City Tax in France and USA more than 40 years ago. Given that was charged to all and any night stop, it was a city tax and not tourist tax. But was it not also taking advantage of tourists? NYC must have raked in millions.

PAXboy 24th August 2024 16:07

Travellers to Abu Dhabi's Zayed International Airport may soon be able to use facial recognition to check in for flights.


Abu Dhabi Airports is developing a "Smart Travel" project that involves rolling out biometric authentification artificial intelligence (AI) into all security checkpoints at the airport by 2025.

The project will use the databases of the United Arab Emirates’ Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security to "automatically authenticate travellers," according to a July statement from the local government.

Etihad Airways already has biometric systems in place that use facial recognition before boarding and assists with self-service baggage delivery and traveller check-ins.

That means people won’t need their boarding passes to board one of Etihad’s planes. The technology is also being implemented for five additional airlines at check-in and boarding gates.

These new technologies means it will take roughly seven seconds from the 25 at regular kiosks to go through the entire ticket and travel document verification process.

The project "will enhance airline performance by eliminating the need for expensive infrastructure expansions and effectively detecting fraud and forgery in identification documents," a statement from Abu Dhabi Airports reads.

Italian authorities started trials in May on a similar software called FaceBoarding that uses facial recognition at two airports: Milano Linate and Catania.

Travellers use airport kiosks to show their documents and scan their faces. That lets them use FaceBoarding again at other checkpoints, making it faster for security and boarding.

SEA, the company managing the new Italian system, says on the Milano-Linate airport website that those who opt-in to Faceboarding will have their data processed only "for the purpose of participation in the project".
Reported via Yahoo News

MechEngr 24th August 2024 16:47


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11681985)
As I further recall, pax rejected the rear-facing seat for various reasons.

Actually it as mainly the airlines - rear facing seats weighed more IIRC

In rear facing the seat backs have to take the weight of the passenger under acceleration, meaning the hinges and seat back frames have to be far stronger. That's where the weight comes from. In forward crashes the seat backs are essentially on their own and could just as well be cardboard.

Expatrick 24th August 2024 16:52


Originally Posted by S.o.S. (Post 11722311)
An article in an upmarket travel magazine talks about three towns introducing Tourist taxes, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole. They draw a parallel with Venice, lake Como, Brussels and parts of Japan.

I distinctly recall hotels charging a City Tax in France and USA more than 40 years ago. Given that was charged to all and any night stop, it was a city tax and not tourist tax. But was it not also taking advantage of tourists? NYC must have raked in millions.

Tourists shouid be taken advantage of (by legitimate means, obviously!) - otherwise they're just a nuisance! 😆

Budapest has had a tourist tax for years. Interestingly, staying up the road recently we, although Budapest residents, also had to pay the tax. Peanuts though so not bothered!

PAXboy 25th August 2024 13:01

The meedja do like to report 'new news'. The fact that it is only new to them is irrelevant.

David_Stock 26th August 2024 06:56

Paxboy, here are two unpleasant facts about Helsinki: the weather can be quite gloomy with long, dark winters, and the cost of living is notoriously high. The picture really captures the situation accurately!

S.o.S. 26th August 2024 10:35

Hello David_Stock and welcome to the Cabin of PPRuNe. Thank you for bringing a direct and honest approach in your first post. :ok:

PAXboy 26th August 2024 13:58

Slaying the myths about tougher post-Brexit red tape for UK travellers to Europe
Good article in The Independent

The headlines this week looked scary for those of us who fret about red tape when travelling. “UK citizens travelling to EU next summer will have to pay €7 visa-waiver charge” read one.

Let me guide you through the latest post-Brexit bureaucracy muddle – starting with that very headline.

Myth 1: “UK citizens travelling to EU next summer will have to pay €7 visa-waiver charge.”

Happily, that sentence becomes correct only if you replace “will” with “won’t”. Certainly, the toughest-ever tightening of red tape for British travellers will begin 10 weeks from now. But you won’t have to pay anything for at least another year.

Asturias56 27th August 2024 07:25


Originally Posted by David_Stock (Post 11723285)
Paxboy, here are two unpleasant facts about Helsinki: the weather can be quite gloomy with long, dark winters, and the cost of living is notoriously high. The picture really captures the situation accurately!

However the natives overcome this with a vast amount of (expensive) alcohol. I worked there on and off for several years - we always commented on the fact that most Scandinavians, like the Brits, head to the bar and start flinging it down as fast as possible.

The Finns sit there and drink slowly. But they never stop...................................

justapax 27th August 2024 12:41


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11723877)
The Finns sit there and drink slowly. But they never stop...................................

My (limited experience of drinking in Finland is summarised by this ancient joke. Stop reading if you've heard it before...

Two Finns go into a bar. They order vodkas, down them, and sit in silence.
Then two more. Then two more. After the seventh, the second Finn says to the first Finn 'I don't feel so well'.
The first Finn replies 'I thought we came out to drink, not to talk'.

Mr Mac 27th August 2024 15:06

I once flew to Helsinki on the Friday evening Finnair service from LHR to Helsinki. I swear the Drinks cart came out as we were passing Windsor Castle and did not get put away again until we were 30 miles out from Helsinki ;)

Cheers
Mr Mac

justapax 27th August 2024 16:52

Swissair used to go one better than that. During the Iran-Iraq war Iran Air used to fly the Iranian airspace sector from Tehran to Bandar Abbas, where Swissair took over for a short flight across the Gulf; for reasons which will become obvious I don't remember where the flight landed.

As soon as the plane left Iranian airspace the FAs used to come around each pulling one drinks trolley behind them and pushing another in front. They often had to go back to the galley to refill their trollies before they reached the back of the plane, and then they didn't so much deboard us as pour us out of the plane. Two weeks of Tehrani heat on soft drinks gives you a tremendous thirst!

Asturias56 28th August 2024 07:00

"y (limited experience of drinking in Finland is summarised by this ancient joke. Stop reading if you've heard it before..."

The version I heard was after 5 hours drinking "how's Mum?" " I thought we were here to drink..................


Asturias56 28th August 2024 07:05

There used to be a Business Class only flight first thing on weekdays from Helsinki to Oslo. Helsinki Apt was full of well dressed business folk of all sexes downing (English) cider and booze at 06:30

The Norwegians referred to it as the Cognac Express - seeing someone get through a few miniatures at 08:00 was an interesting experience - perhaps only beaten by a Glaswegian on the 07:00 Mallaig train who ordered a can of Newcastle Brown Ale with his cornflakes - for a dreadful moment I though he was going to pour it over them.......................

justapax 28th August 2024 07:50

It used to be (maybe still is) that the first Aer Lingus flight LHR-DUB had a bar serving pints of Guinness as soon as you entered the boarding gate, two of those down the throat, then if you were sitting up front there was a miniature version of a Full Irish breakfast with buck's fizz: if you asked nicely the FA wouldn't pour them into the same glass, and ask you 'would like another of the little bottles of champagne?' then out of the plane, into a taxi and directly into technical meetings about Fresnel zones and wind loadings. Are things still that relaxed travelling to the Emerald Isle?:)

RevMan2 1st September 2024 14:30

Back in the day when drinks used to cost and Ms RevMan2 was a FA on LH, they dreaded any Scandinavian/Baltic flight for the sheer post-flight work in accounting for multi-hundred drinks. All cash. In a variety of currencies...

PAXboy 4th September 2024 12:20

I read that Czech Airlines are dropping out from SkyTeam later this year. They will then use the QS code of their owner Smartwings. My guess is that, belonging to one of the big groups must be expensive.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:12.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.