Airlines investigated over claims they deliberately split up groups then charge for a
 

CAA lumbers into 'action'.

Airlines investigated over claims they deliberately split up groups then charge for allocated seats | The Independent

What's the betting they find nothing and do not need to take any action? After all, are the carriers going to show them the detailed code of their booking and seat allocating systems? :hmm:

And even if they do find that the airlines are doing this, or just randomly assigning seats regardless of being booked on same PNR, have they actually broken the law?

It's called unselling and lots of businesses do it. Some are just better at it than others.

How about going after the car rental firms for selling you insurance you don't actually need?

I think you may find that the CAA have a fair amount of clout in this case, regardless of what the law may or may not say.

"Airline seating practices are clearly causing some confusion for consumers. Airlines are within their rights to charge for allocated seats, but if they do so it must be done in a fair, transparent way.

Our research shows that some consumers are paying to sit together when, in fact, they might not need to."

whats the big fuss about sitting next to people you know on a plane?

I like sitting by myself, it means I can be left alone to read a book.

Oh Dear. There are too many people who forget they are customers and expect decent treatment; and that airlines are in the customer service industry and not the customer fleecing industry. I also think allowing all this low level customer service attitude to have developed over the past 15 years is a UK thing. It is where the rot started and sadly it has polluted the rest of Europe. Pax have been punch drunked into accepting it all as the norm. Any kind of fight back is most welcome, then we can get back to the standards of where we should be. And before anyone starts shouting low prices will rise, well let them; but they won't. If pax figures drop off prices will be adjusted. Pax are becoming wiser and shop around for the best value bottom line total price. It is becoming easier to find more pleasant affordable alternatives to the fleecers.
Pax dignity needs to be taken back soon.

RAT 5 I have to agree with you.

The key aspect is families travelling with children/teenagers who are entitled to sit together for obvious reasons.

Indeed. Several years ago, when booking your own flight online was in its infancy for the masses, and the idea of choosing a seat online was barely heard of, I booked five tickets for me and my family. Two of the three children were under 11 and booked as such.

When we got the departure airport, we discovered that we were seated all over the plane, with no-one near each other. After much loud complaining, especially along the lines of 'my six year old daughter is sitting with a parent or we will shout even louder' it got sorted. But not a pleasant experience at the time and a lesson learnt.

Is this only a European issue as I've never experienced it within Asia?

If not paying for a seat I’ve found you are more likely to end up in a middle seat towards the back. If with an airline doing connecting flights with a tight transfer, you are likely to get a seat towards the front on the first leg.

It can be worth paying if you’re going to a small airport and want to be in front at immigration, also better quality passengers tend to be the ones paying more to sit up front
Which could be worth considering as well.

I've seen reports in press of children being seperated from their parents in aircraft. Surely there must be rules on this ?

I recall years ago, being on a flight where this happened - child of 6 or so split from parents. Father was an ex-mil pilot, complained this was a safety issue (in case of evacuation) and demanded that his complaint be recorded in aircraft safety log (or something similar, can't remember exact details). In any case, cabin crew backed down and reunited parent and child.

What beats me is that if RYR say that they only charge €2 per pax per seat, why not just incorporate it in the basic published fare and be done with it?! This low cost sickness of charging extra for every separate aspect of the flight has now got way out of hand.

It’s a control freak attitude.

Wow, the self-entitlement is strong with this one.

You're entitled to what you pay for and nothing more.

All that is happening is the snowflakes dont want to pay the fee, arrive knowing they will statistically not be sitting together and then kick off about how unfair it is.

If they want to sit together, or have a specific need to sit together, then they pay. Its that simple.

Do you really have to ask ?

People will use other carriers over a £2 difference.

As usual, people want things at a rock bottom price but are trying to wriggle out of consequences of that choice.

If its only £2 then why not pay it and have peace of ind - but no, instead they 'save' £2 and then whine about the direct consequences they knew about when they chose to save £2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAXboy https://www.pprune.org/images/buttons/viewpost.gif
The key aspect is families travelling with children/teenagers who are entitled to sit together for obvious reasons.

GrahamO
I do not have children but, based on previous discussions on this topic in this forum, I understand that the CAA had mandated this. I might be wrong. I don't know many parents who would willingly let their children sit next to stangers. I understand that some are not prepared to pay for the certainty and then moan about it.

However, LCCs have always stressed the cost and so, after 30 years, that's what folks look for. The question here is: Do the carriers now deliberately split families - on the same booking - in order to coerce them into paying for reservations, no matter if it is a low price?

What about when you can't select seats?
 

On a separate but associated note, how can I book seats together when my ticket has been booked by a travel agent in association with a cruise? I can access the booking to add passport information, contact details etc but I can't see baggage allowance, reserve seats or upgrade. Flights are with BA.

In this case I will be mightily p***ed off if I get to the 24 hour checkin window and we don't have the option of seats together.

At last, somebody gets it.

There is a real and almost certainly well founded suspicion that some airlines are deliberately separating passengers travelling as a group in order to gouge them for a bit more cash.

If the airlines are using algorithms to assign seating, how difficult can it be to adapt those to keep travellers on the same PNR together?

What utter tosh. What we are seeing here is once again self-important aircrew showing their firm belief that airlines exist solely to keep their hours current and fund their lifestyles (not all of them - just the utter cads who give the rest a bad name).

Back in 2010 we (my family and I) flew British Midland(?) to Cairo. I have two daughters who at the time would have bee 12 and 13. When we booked we specified that the girls must sit with one of us - we knew it was an A321 and so only 3 people could sit together. They assured us that this was no problem and the bookings had been flagged accordingly. When we came to do the on-line check-in malarky we couldn't even find two seats together, let alone three, so we phoned and asked them to check - they found the promise and gave us three adjacent checked-in seats and another elsewhere. When we arrived at the gate they told us the seats had been reassigned (yeah, right!) and each of my daughters was sitting next to male strangers.

The gate didn't give a flying dingo's kidney about what we had been promised, so I asked to have the captain's written confirmation that he accepted personal responsibility for any harm my daughters came to. I was obviously told to take a hike. So I called the airport police and explained the situation, saying that I felt the airline were not exercising their duties of care towards my children. Airport policeman agreed, and asked for the captain to be called to the gate. He put it to him straight - he was personally responsible, and if he refused to sign a statement to that effect then he would be interviewed under caution, or he could choose to address the problem by allowing my wife and daughters to sit together on the same row.

The captain said that he had not been told of the problem (I believed him) and OF COURSE young girls should not be required to sit between strangers on his aeroplane. As if by magic there was suddenly a free row of seats, with a free isle seat ion the other side.

So if you find yourself in this position the solution is pretty simple. The aircrew on here are always banging on about how the Captain has absolute authority over his/her aeroplane, so you just have to make it clear that with absolute authority goes absolute responsibility. So if your daughter suffers unwanted touching or or worse then the Captain will be a co-defendant in the subsequent criminal prosecution for sexual assault. The captain has absolute responsibility, and so if any crime is commited on his/her aeroplane the Captain should go to jail with the other criminals.

Fair enough?

From the OP’s link:Well that has sorted that.

If you don't want to pay and are separated from the kids, I'm sure that if they started crying they would soon be moved.

However, are the children really at risk from sexual predator on a flight (in which most are just a few hours)?

Doubt it.

The risks are by far overplayed.

Only if they're sitting next to one.

Oh, hang on .

When I read your posts GreyhamO I can only conclude that you have been well and truly brainwashed to the point where you are no longer able to think outside the box.

Emirates charge rather more than £2.

And multiply that by more than one passenger.

And I can recall SirTim Clark talking on the in-flight audio about this and anybody who hadn't flown before might have thought he was talkign about a new ffacility where previously airlines didn't sit people together but now they could.

It didn't seem to be an issue over thelast 30 years + that I've been flying until the online technology allowed them to sell this feature and the copy cat nature of the marketeers in the business means they all pile in.

The airline industry as a whole has been fairly despicable about this.

It suits them to turn this into a 'fear sell' for families. So even if they are not doing anything deliberate they are encouraging some customers to pay out of concern.

My feeling is that government could do something simple. Air tickets are VAT free. Any extras such as 'speedy boarding' or seat selection should be liable for VAT. That would give the airlines a bit of a dilemma.

The evacuation argument trumps pretty well every other consideration.

If the airline sits your kid(s) further from the exit than you, are you going to abandon them in an evacuation, or force your way towards them against the flow and potentially put other passengers' lives in danger?

Airlines need to get real.

Well....It's not just the families who might feel a bit inconvenienced.

Last year, I had to fly back from Luanda to CDG in Economy because the Business Section was full, and I found myself sitting next to two youngish children ( maybe 10 or 11 years old ) who were seperate, didn't know each other, one in the middle seat, one in the window seat.

I spent the whole nine hours or so being interrupted either by the children wanting to get past to go see their parents for something, or the parents leaning over me to talk to the children.

Felt like quite probably the longest, worst flight of my life.

Saintsman

Would you risk your children?

When I first flew I was 14 and BA organised a stewardess to escort me from the terminal to my seat, which was next to a kindly middle-aged lady. I'm sure I remember reading that there was a law against seating lone women and children next to single men but it seems I must be mistaken.

Fast forward a few years and I took an Easyjet flight to and from Cyprus. On the way there, they did as I thought they always did at the time. Families with young kids got free speedy boarding and you got your pick of unallocated seats and could always ensure you were together. It was a good and generous system.

On the way back we were given allocated seats. My partner and I were separate and my 2 year old son was about 20 rows back across the aisle and between two single men. It was remarkably difficult to interest the flight attendants in the problem, or the other passengers who didn't seem to want to move. And I've checked my reservations and there was no mention of any possibility of booking seats beforehand.

I'm afraid anybody who doesn't think that is ridiculous doesn't have kids of their own.

Anyone who doesn't think that is more probably the sort of person we parents are trying tp prevent getting at our children.

I agree. On a one-off basis the risks are doubtless quite low, but if you're going to take a few dozen flights as a child then the risks will become more significant.

But this is hardly the only issue: as a parent, having your toddler sit 20 rows away might feel like a blessing. None of that constant making-sure they have their seatbelts on. No interminable repeat-readings of 'Thomas the Tank Engine'. No careful rationing of snacks when they seem about to have a tantrum. Somebody else can sort out the changing of nappies. Or else believe me they'll suffer for it.

This from a pal:

My wife is the one that makes sure we have passports and tickets when going away. Once on a flight when [name] was just two, they boarded an airplane to discover there were only single seats. Naturally my wife wanted to sit with [child]. She went up and down the plane asking if anybody would accommodate, but nobody would. So she took [child] and put him in the centre of two guys who refused to move. She said she hoped they'd have a good trip and they were good with screaming two-year-olds. They suddenly decided to give up their seats.

As it happens, the boy was not a 'screamer' and is very mild mannered but it shows that some people do not understand the problem.
https://www.pprune.org/data:image/pn...AASUVORK5CYIIA

People paying for seat selection has rather hardened attitudes.

Those who haven't and end up with issues when it comes to seating at boarding time get little sympathy.

It probably makes things more difficult for CC as well - more likely to cause a dispute if they try and move people.

All the more reason, then, for the airlines to keep family groups together when they allocate seats.

If you read the OP’s link, and my previous post, this investigation has nothing to do with Children being seated with their parents. While, I’m sure it’s an interesting discussion ...

ExXB, you mean that the thread has somewhat drifted off course? Quelle surprise! ;)

In something like 98% of cases of child abuse the perpetrator is known to the child. So statistically the airline should exercise their duty of care by sitting children next to strangers.

I think the issue here has nothing to do with child safety. The practical reality is I do not want to be seated next to someone else's child if I can avoid it, particularly if the child is not supervised. So I expect the airline, in every ones interest, to seat children with their parents.

Maybe Ryanair should offer the option to pay not to sit next to an unsupervised child? I'd pay a lot more than £2!

Imagine the horror this February 14th if lots of Valentines couples find they need to pay extra to be seated together at the restaurant!

"XYZ opens up Valentines dating flights."

You buy a ticket for 9.99, cabin bag only. 1 night away. You turn up at the airport and XYZ then tells you where you are going so they can fill up the flights. A section of the cabin has been blocked off for participants and you have no idea who you are going to sit next to. Good luck with aviation speed dating. During the flight seat swapping is allowed.
Some will be luckier than others. The next day you turn up at the airport and the procedure is repeated; meaning you have no idea which airport you are going to come home to, only the country. Good game. Good game.

Flying standby I rarely was seated with my partner. Sometimes we couldn’t even travel on the same flight. Perhaps I should sue for damages. That will teach them.

ExXB, I know it was a partly tongue-in-cheek comment, but travelling stand-by isn't quite a valid argument! ;)