Im more concerned his mother refered to his knob as a "fleshy flagpole".
Call me old fashioned but mothers should not be looking at fleshy bits that are in a state of "flagpole". Or more worryingly being anywhere near a sons "flagpole". I think social services should be informed.:eek::ok:

Ah, but it could explain a lot, wee one; maybe you are on to something.

When I read his comments he seems to have the syntax of Julian Clary!!

Should be fun if there is an emergency and he has to use the slides......

and I purposely didn't say ' emergency evacuation' as that could open up a whole different topic ;)

Would you say the same to an Asian? A black person?

What gives you the right to discriminate against me on the basis of my clothes-free beliefs?

I would say the same to a person of any colour/creed/religion - if you seriously think that you should be able to travel naked - then you are a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

The law, actually.

Would we say it? Who knows but you are obviously an attention seeker searching for some kind of reaction.

Why don't you just do it and save debating until after you have done the deed?

Once you have done it you have have a mass debate about it!

Which law?

Indecent exposure only applies if the person "exposing" themself did so to cause offence.

Simply being naked is not an offence in itself.

I think the clue is in the first line of the first post.
The "event" by definition being something that happens at a specific venue, occaision or point in time. Outside of the "event" it doesn't follow that the behaviour, dress (or lack of it) would be acceptable or lawful. For example you might be travelling to a clinic in the South of France (or elsewhere) for the purpose of satisfying your "life philosphy" of being a sperm doner. However it really wouldn't follow that you could indulge that passion, in public, whilst travelling en-route!

As steeplechases go, nudity is one fraught with many obstacles, entaglement likely to cause much embarrasment, pain and distress, and therefore best avoided.

Cloaks are useful for preserving modesty, and the cloak of an anonymous username on a forum such as this, is clearly one that even an established "member" can acquire to protect their perceived dignity and reputation. As steeplechases go, I think this particular horse has run it's course.

Good luck with your trip, and be sure to let us know how go got on (or didn't as the case may be.) Be Nice, and keep those body parts that would otherwise be Toulouse safely encumbered. Remember that the "fleshy flagpole" that Marsailles under, Cannes cause embarassment to others, and a flight of less than 2 hours isn't Toulon to keep yourself properly robed. I wouldn't want you to end up as a perpignan..der police cells. ;)

No law, your point was that you weren't allowed to be discriminated against based on you desire to be a flasher, in the same way that people aren't allowed to be discriminated against based on race or disability.

In fact, while there are laws to prevent racial and disability discrimination there are no laws to prevent descrimination against perverted old men (see what I did there?).

And yet the threshold for indecency is very low, essentially a single person on the aircraft would have to object for it to become indecent exposure. If you don't cover up immediately when this is brought to your attention then, to refer to my earlier statement, Enjoy Prison.

Now if you were a proper naturist, rather than a rubbish troll, you'd know this.

Yeah, but Beazelbub I don't reckon there's any way he's gonna get his exposed Carcassonne the plane in the first place...

...and certainly not with his Gap showing.......

A queue of fellow pax lining up to take photos might discourage......or maybe not..:confused:

Well, here goes...

But Nudie how are you going to update us on how it went?? I'm assuming prisons in the South of France don't have internet access for their, er, guests.

Nudeflyer: you seem quite certain of your rights and your opinion on this matter so I am a bit confused as to why you are even asking our opinions, unless you are a stirrer or troll as the internet chaps would call you. But if you are so certain of your right to wander around in the all together why are you concerned about when to disrobe? Why not put your money where your mouth is, and leave home in your birthday suit, take the bus tot he tube, and hop of at the appropriate stop at Hatton Cross or the terminal of your airline's choice? If you haven't worked out the etiquette by then you might just get away with it! I know that LHR security use rubber gloves, but I wouldn't bet my salary on the French being quite so accommodating! You'll probably get a prod in the rump with a fresh baton form the patisserie, and rude but firm invitation to return yourself across La Manche! Whatever you do, put a digital compact in your bum bag, and send us some photos (waist up please), or shall we just keep an eye on The Current Bun for naked air traveller stories? Happy holiday you complete fruit cake!

Troll, troll, troll, troll.

The single most successful Troll that I've seen in here. What does that say about Prooners? :confused:

I don't understand all the fuss.....It's not like it's never been done before.
Naked-Air
:E

Well from Naked Air some excerpts that should answer this trolls questions

So in a nutshell you cannot force your privates on those who are not willing participants. In this case the people at the airport and in your aircraft. So wait a while before you get to the resort and feel the sand between your cheeks and the wind on your flag!