Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Windowless planes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th May 2025 | 11:16
  #61 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,447
Likes: 367
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by chevvron
On the other hand, when I flew in a Viscount after years of jet flying I was pleasantly surprised with the huge windows in the cabin.
I also found that an Emb 195 has pleasantly large windows and it is very light in the cabin.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2025 | 12:30
  #62 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,842
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
Been on the E 135, 75, 90 with two different carriers. Very good experiences.
PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 14th July 2025 | 16:51
  #63 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 34
From: the Shire
It's all about the profit!

Once O'Leery realises the cost benefits of a lighter airframe he'll start ordering freighter airframes with seats inside. "Just like a spaceship!"

Eventually we'll all be stood up in a windowless tube and fleeced for every breath of oxygen that we take.

The en!!!!tyfying of everything!

Don't help him with ideas!!

conanthelibrarian is offline  
Reply
Old 14th July 2025 | 17:25
  #64 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 271
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by conanthelibrarian
Once O'Leery realises the cost benefits of a lighter airframe he'll start ordering freighter airframes with seats inside. "Just like a spaceship!"

Eventually we'll all be stood up in a windowless tube and fleeced for every breath of oxygen that we take.

The en!!!!tyfying of everything!

Don't help him with ideas!!
Not sure where you get the idea freighters are lighter? Freighter aircraft are never any lighter than passenger variants because by their very nature they have to have beefed up structure in both the floor area to take the extra weight and have cargo doors, which again adds to weight.

With regard to adding ever more passengers, such as the many news articles that 'standing seats' or 'double decker seats' are imminently going to be introduced, it's all utter tosh. Designers often come up with these type designs but forget one important factor regarding squeezing as many people into an aircraft, if you cannot evacuate the maximum number of passengers in the required [relatively short] time-frame required for certification, it's never going to happen...while you could add even more emergency exits to an aircraft, that is self defeating as you then require more crew and also more space around emergency exits.
As I said designers will trot out designs but how many of them actually go into production?....Anyway, why are we discussing windowless planes and cramming ever more people on aircraft, as by now shouldn't we all be in flying cars



.
MAC 40612 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.