Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Anybody getting on a 737 Max?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Anybody getting on a 737 Max?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th January 2024 | 16:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 500
From: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Anybody getting on a 737 Max?

Post latest issue re Alaskan Airlines can I ask if anyone is getting on these aircraft on here. I have just posted on the Alaskan Airlines thread about how I am actively avoiding the 787 / 737 Max and just wondered if it was just me ? As a business I know we are not using the Max for staff travel and to be honest none of our staff like the 787 so that seems to sort itself out. Also the carriers we use LH, SQ, EK limit our exposure, but I just wondered how wide spread or not is that feeling ?

Cheers
Mr Mac
Mr Mac is online now  
Reply

Popular Reply

10th January 2024, 00:40
TowerDog

SkyGod
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 107
From: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Ouch..


Old 6th January 2024 | 16:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 24
From: Blighty
I am thinking about avoiding shorthaul with airlines using the 737 Max-9 until the Alaska Air investigation is substantially complete or a root cause clearly identified. The grounding of these aircraft may spread from Alaska to other airlines and result in many people having their flights cancelled. If I book a flight, it is because I need or want to fly, and don't fancy having travel plans cancelled. If flights are cancelled, I prefer it happen to other people rather than me.
Aeromexico, Air Tanzania, Alaska, Copa, Corendon Dutch, Flydubai, Icelandair, Lion Air, SCAT, Turkish, United - sorry but no short-haul bookings from me for now.

Last edited by davidjohnson6; 6th January 2024 at 16:53.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2024 | 17:05
  #3 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 273
Likes: 5
From: Ireland
Won’t use it. Fortunately I use mostly EI, LH and LX so that helps.
alserire is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2024 | 17:11
  #4 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 231
From: Asia
I believe one has to rely on the regulators. Else why have them?

If there really is an issue they should take action.
ZFT is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2024 | 17:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 24
From: Blighty
US FAA has grounded 171 737 Max 9s for inspection. CAAs all round the world will now likely feel duty bound to do the same thing. Cue flight cancellations
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67903655
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2024 | 18:05
  #6 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,842
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
I have said in here before that I would not use the Max. Not because of safety issues as the original problem was fixed. But the problem was created by Boeing for monetary reasons and some airlines were also part of that. My not travelling on the Max will not be noted but I will not do it. This latest problem may (or may not) turn out to be a manufacturing problem. I expect that millions of people will be safely carried by the Max but it does not change my view.

The 787 is in related territory. Thus far I have only done four sectors on it and can see/feel no advantage to me. I understand the advantage for the operators. Thus far, the 78 has had longer to have design problems addressed but we have yet to learn about any manufacturing ones. It looks like I may have to use the 78 later this year as the operator is not giving me any options - even though they originally said that the route in question would be served by a different machine.
PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2024 | 18:53
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 3
From: Auckland, NZ
I won’t fly the Max and avoid any airline that operates it where it could be used as a replacement airframe.
it just isn’t worth the risk.
James 1077 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 16:36
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 2
From: Nice, Cote d'Azur
Originally Posted by ZFT
I believe one has to rely on the regulators. Else why have them?

If there really is an issue they should take action.

Because like in several other industries, the regulators have been compromised (in this case by the manufacturer)
nuisance79 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 17:10
  #9 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 273
Likes: 5
From: Ireland
Originally Posted by ZFT
I believe one has to rely on the regulators. Else why have them?

If there really is an issue they should take action.
I’d sooner rely on my own common sense.
alserire is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 17:16
  #10 (permalink)  
Community Builder
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 302
From: Clarty Waters, UK
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
I am thinking about avoiding shorthaul with airlines using the 737 Max-9 until the Alaska Air investigation is substantially complete or a root cause clearly identified.
That seems fair enough.

If I had to get on a 737 Max I would do so, but would avoid it if I could, at least until, as you say, the cause of the Alaska Air incident is identified.

Unlike some, I don't have an issue with other Boeing types.
Andy_S is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 17:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 1
From: New York
I would fly on the 737 Max but keep my seatbelt on at all times.
jared131 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 18:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 446
From: same planet as yours
I think that after the MCAS-debacle, future safety statistics will prove the MAX not to be an unacceptable safety risk.
That being said, I'll try to avoid it where I can, but that's got to do more with the fact the MAX was a project ran by bean-counters and the design being based one time too many, on grandfather rights.
Refusing to fly with Ryanair on socio-economic grounds will, in my continent anyway, facilitate future MAX-avoiding.

Contributing also, my disliking the 737 since its introduction, with the fat, ugly original one, replacing the mighty 727 in my neck of the woods. Not to speak about the subsequent generation with its 'unaesthetic' (to avoid further foul language) engines being forced under the too low a wing. And yes, the MAX did a good job on this aspect....because there was no other option...
DIBO is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 21:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 13
From: UK
I believe that other recent 737s (737-800, 737-900) have this plug door arrangement? Should I avoid them too?
Hartington is offline  
Reply
Old 7th January 2024 | 22:18
  #14 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,842
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
It seems that the question abiout this incident is not design but manufacturing. Depending on time and place of manufacturer - will hinge any concerrns.
PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2024 | 00:37
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 58
From: ord
I’ve flown in the back several times on the 39M over the past few months on Alaska and United. Nice planes, the pilots seem to like them also.
kap'n krunch is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2024 | 01:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: FL
At this point I would actively avoid flying on a max.
Armorer is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2024 | 03:27
  #17 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,842
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
This information is from the website of FR24. I think they are known as a reliable source of fleet data.

Which airlines operate the 737-9 MAX?

They detail which have the door active and which blocked.
PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2024 | 07:48
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 67
From: UK
Originally Posted by PAXboy
This information is from the website of FR24. I think they are known as a reliable source of fleet data.

Which airlines operate the 737-9 MAX?

They detail which have the door active and which blocked.

Great, and to simplify more, the 737's with Door Plugs (exit unused) has a Window, and those with an active exit door - these have a small porthole.
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2024 | 07:59
  #19 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 67
From: UK
Originally Posted by Hartington
I believe that other recent 737s (737-800, 737-900) have this plug door arrangement? Should I avoid them too?
The 737-900ER (a stretched -800) has the door option.
900's do not have them (such as KLM's)
No -800's have them.
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th January 2024 | 08:26
  #20 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,699
Likes: 2,041
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by PAXboy
This information is from the website of FR24. I think they are known as a reliable source of fleet data.

Which airlines operate the 737-9 MAX?

They detail which have the door active and which blocked.
More than 80% of the Max 9 aircraft built to date have the door plug.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.