Safety of Boeing 787
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Riyadh
Safety of Boeing 787
I know this post will draw the ire of some, but I'm wondering what the consensus is on the safety status of the Boeing 787, particularly in light of the 737 Max fiasco.
The Al Jazeera documentary was quite shocking, even if it did engage in a bit of gotcha journalism, and this recent article from the New York Times raises many of the same concerns.
My wife will be flying on the Boeing 787 multiple times in the next couple of months, and to be honest I'm deeply concerned. I'll be doing a trans-Atlantic flight on a 787 myself (didn't realize it when I bought the ticket), and needless to say that has me a bit worried as well.
Have these issues been overblown, or is it generally a good idea to avoid the 787 at all costs?
The Al Jazeera documentary was quite shocking, even if it did engage in a bit of gotcha journalism, and this recent article from the New York Times raises many of the same concerns.
My wife will be flying on the Boeing 787 multiple times in the next couple of months, and to be honest I'm deeply concerned. I'll be doing a trans-Atlantic flight on a 787 myself (didn't realize it when I bought the ticket), and needless to say that has me a bit worried as well.
Have these issues been overblown, or is it generally a good idea to avoid the 787 at all costs?
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,423
Likes: 1
From: world
Avoiding the 787 won't guarantee you anything. There's no 100% assurance in any type really. I have flown the 787 several times including it's early days of operation and feel no less safer than I do in a B777 or A330. There are roughly 640 787s in service worldwide flying at least a couple of sectors per day (with the exception of those on scheduled maintenance).
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 906
Likes: 102
From: Southampton
When people ask me about aircraft safety, I remind them that the most dangerous thing about flying is the trip to the airport...
Besides, most of the 787 is plastic, so it's not going to be full of metal shavings (or swarf to give it its correct name).
Besides, most of the 787 is plastic, so it's not going to be full of metal shavings (or swarf to give it its correct name).
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: UK
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,423
Likes: 1
From: world
From what I've seen I know that the type is very poor in the Y class comfort department. Doesn't just apply to the 787 though. There are other types with equally poor Y class comfort, depending on the carrier and their specific configuration. The 787 is fine up front though! 
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Riyadh
Thanks, everyone. So the consensus seems to be that it's no more dangerous than other aircraft, though it may have comfort issues in economy class.
Comfort isn't a critical factor for me. I much prefer to fly with US-based carriers, in spite of their generally horrible service, as their safety records are usually impeccable. Unfortunately, that's not always possible where I live, and more and more local carriers are using the 787 (though not Qatar Airways, interestingly).
Comfort isn't a critical factor for me. I much prefer to fly with US-based carriers, in spite of their generally horrible service, as their safety records are usually impeccable. Unfortunately, that's not always possible where I live, and more and more local carriers are using the 787 (though not Qatar Airways, interestingly).
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 136
Likes: 4
From: Here
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,701
Likes: 2,045
From: Reading, UK
I suspect the previous poster was referring to not seeing them at Saudi airports, which is no surprise either given the current political situation between the two countries.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 13
From: UK
I avoided them for much the same reason. However, I went on a BA example this time last year and found I rather liked the window control.
