Airbus Plans Stacked Seating For Passengers
Paxing All Over The World
Thread Starter
Airbus' turn to patent new seating
This one's a cracker ... 
But, as is often the case, it is only a Patent and may never get bought by the carriers:
Economy class is about to get a lot worse | Business News | News | The Independent
But, as is often the case, it is only a Patent and may never get bought by the carriers:
Airbus, the plane manufacturer, has patented a mezzanine seating design that piles passengers on top of one another. In this design, passengers are able to recline into a lying position, but the seats are also stacked on top of one another, so that another set of passengers can fit just a few feet above the first.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seriously doubt they are 'certifiable". There is no way that an evacuation could be performed safely with that configuration.
I also doubt such seats could meet the 16g requirements.
Let's patent every possible idea, and if someone can figure out how it can actually work, we'll sue them for millions. ....
Patent trolls.
I also doubt such seats could meet the 16g requirements.
Let's patent every possible idea, and if someone can figure out how it can actually work, we'll sue them for millions. ....
Patent trolls.
Resident insomniac
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
So, is the restriction on passenger numbers due to space, weight, or evacuation regulations?
If the proposed arrangement is adopted, would we see shorter fuselages?
There are serious plans in the UK to introduce 'commuter trains' with fewer seats and hanging straps (similar to London Underground trains) to facilitate faster loading and unloading.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...n-9805683.html
If the proposed arrangement is adopted, would we see shorter fuselages?
There are serious plans in the UK to introduce 'commuter trains' with fewer seats and hanging straps (similar to London Underground trains) to facilitate faster loading and unloading.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...n-9805683.html
They have filed a patent to stop somebody else cashing in. This does not mean that they plan to impose something that is down to the operator to choose but if the operator does choose, then Airbus may get royalties.
It's like having a daft idea before anybody else, then realising somebody might actually do it.
It's like having a daft idea before anybody else, then realising somebody might actually do it.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe not the stacking but the layered design has actually got some benefits...
Lower floor with center barrier, effectively the footpath of upper floor.
One would need sufficient fuselage width to be feasible as minimum height restrictions would be required and also loose belly space. But in the area of hand-luggage travel being promoted by airlines that may not be such a bad idea
Lower floor with center barrier, effectively the footpath of upper floor.
One would need sufficient fuselage width to be feasible as minimum height restrictions would be required and also loose belly space. But in the area of hand-luggage travel being promoted by airlines that may not be such a bad idea
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Middle East
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, let's implement this. We can double the pax loads. Almost 400 pax in an A321/B737-900. About 1,000 pax in a 747/A380.
I'm sure takeoff and landing weight issues will never be a problem…...
I'm also sure that 90 second evacuations won't be a problem….
Governments wouldn't let this happen.
I'm sure takeoff and landing weight issues will never be a problem…...
I'm also sure that 90 second evacuations won't be a problem….
Governments wouldn't let this happen.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is a patent which covered particular elements of the cabin and seating design etc. It is NOT plans for the R***air A380 (sorry mods, you know what I mean).
Has anyone read the claims of the patent before reacting to the usual tabloid press reactions?
c101
Has anyone read the claims of the patent before reacting to the usual tabloid press reactions?
c101
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seat pitch
I'm not sure I would mind all that much about such an arrangement.
I'm rather tall and also somewhat wide. From the drawings there, the seat pitch and the seat width seem to be quite a bit bigger than what I'm used to from economy flights. My knees will be glad. ;-)
Also, there seem to be dividers between the rows, meaning there will be nobody to lower their seat back into my dinner tray.
I'm rather tall and also somewhat wide. From the drawings there, the seat pitch and the seat width seem to be quite a bit bigger than what I'm used to from economy flights. My knees will be glad. ;-)
Also, there seem to be dividers between the rows, meaning there will be nobody to lower their seat back into my dinner tray.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Michael O'Leary from Ryanair bated the media with "Coin Operated" Toilets in his aircraft, it made worldwide news, it even made the 6pm Sydney news down here in Australia. Cost him nothing and he got worldwide attention, we all knew it was never going to happen, but the media bought it.
Now its Airbus' turn.
Media are fools.
Now its Airbus' turn.
Media are fools.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Better still, you could have interchangeable modules. Pax are assembled into their modules at the gate, then you open the aircraft like a freighter and load the modules one by one. Similar at the other end, unload the modules, let the pax off.
It would simplify maintenance too.
It would simplify maintenance too.
