Sitting in the wrong seat
Thread Starter
Sitting in the wrong seat
So, there I was on a flight 5mins to push back and with good fortune was alone with 2 rows of empty seats in front and behind. Just then 8 people turned up with allocated seats at the back of the plane, but on hearing the hostie at the door announce 'boarding completed' they (the passengers) said 'you can sit anywhere you want' to each other and all of a sudden I was not alone....Cue some mumbled curses under my breath, but such is life
My question is this, I was under the impression that you cannot change assigned seating unless the cabin crew is asked/informed due to safety/security issues etc. The crew seemed uninterested/unaware, so I'm assuming that my impression is false. I do remember speaking to an accident investigator some years back talking through some of the techniques used to identify victims in the unfortunate event of a crash and he mentioned this (seat allocation manifest) being the first call in the identification process.
My question is this, I was under the impression that you cannot change assigned seating unless the cabin crew is asked/informed due to safety/security issues etc. The crew seemed uninterested/unaware, so I'm assuming that my impression is false. I do remember speaking to an accident investigator some years back talking through some of the techniques used to identify victims in the unfortunate event of a crash and he mentioned this (seat allocation manifest) being the first call in the identification process.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't think there is any rule. Often when you hear "boarding completed" on a not full flight there is a mad rush to spread out. I've done it many times myself and the crew was nonplussed.
Even if you did tell the crew, they have no way of updating the system, which is on the ground.
May be helpful in an accident, but I doubt it is the only thing they would check.
Even if you did tell the crew, they have no way of updating the system, which is on the ground.
May be helpful in an accident, but I doubt it is the only thing they would check.
Paxing All Over The World
I've seen folks bag empty rows during the climb out. I recall having my eye on a row with three empty seats in the middle and thinking I'd snaffle that as soon as the Belts went Ping.
Within a minute of rotation, a young man had slipped his belt, dived across to the row and got comfy.
By the time the Ping went - he was stretched across all three, wrapped in a blanket and the seat belt correctly fastened across the outside. The crew would have been hard pressed to to get him to go back to his original seat since his only crime was ignoring the belt sign.
Within a minute of rotation, a young man had slipped his belt, dived across to the row and got comfy.
By the time the Ping went - he was stretched across all three, wrapped in a blanket and the seat belt correctly fastened across the outside. The crew would have been hard pressed to to get him to go back to his original seat since his only crime was ignoring the belt sign.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But if on a smaller a/c such as a commuter, be aware that too many self initiated seat changes could seriously affect the weight & balance of the a/c. So always best in these cases to check with CC, who in turn will check with the FD (as I recently witnessed on an EMB-175 flight.
I do remember speaking to an accident investigator some years back talking through some of the techniques used to identify victims in the unfortunate event of a crash and he mentioned this (seat allocation manifest) being the first call in the identification process.
I've always taken the view that once the doors were closed [but obviously before the taxi], and therefore all pax were on board, any 'spare' seats were fair game.
Never had any cc issues.
Never had any cc issues.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wowzz, that may be the case on the larger airliners A319/B737 and upwards. Not so on smaller commuters such as EMB-120, Metroliners, even the DHC-8. The smaller the a/c the more critical the problem can become.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
their incinerated remains after the crash will be that much more difficult to identify.
So knowing who was in what seat is always a help, but not the only way of doing it, and can be unreliable. Teeth are much better in these days of dentistry that's universally well documented except in Russia, parts of China and the Far East, and Africa. And of course Leeds.
I thought you would want to know this.
Thread Starter
The teeth 'angle' was one of the other methods described to me, the AAI chap also mentioned that the brace position was to keep the jaw closed (and the teeth intact for forensic examination) as much as to attempt to alleviate blunt trauma on the neck and spine should the crash be survivable.
As to changing seats, we've all done it I'm sure, it just made me wonder if there was an official stance from the airlines. Thanks for the replies.
SHJ
As to changing seats, we've all done it I'm sure, it just made me wonder if there was an official stance from the airlines. Thanks for the replies.
SHJ
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a standard PA (in economy) that I make for loads of 70% or less.... I tell people the % full but advise them that for reasons of weight and balance they should remain in their check-in allocated seats for take-off: As soon as the seatbelt signs are switched off, they are free (and welcome) to move anywhere that they want. I also remind them that if they have a special meal booked, an change seat, it is their responsibility to advise the crew of their new location.
In general, this works fairly well. It is our airline policy that check-in assigned seats must be occupied for take-off and landing, but I find that a brief word of explanation helps with compliance.
There is always one lone individual who ignores the PA, and decides that their personal needs are more important than complying with social courtesies. Quite apart from being selfish, these people are of course stupid - they believe that neither we, nor anybody else notices (we have an empty seat print-out). I take particular pleasure in turfing them out and back to their original seat, at high volume, thereby causing maximum embarrassment.
In general, this works fairly well. It is our airline policy that check-in assigned seats must be occupied for take-off and landing, but I find that a brief word of explanation helps with compliance.
There is always one lone individual who ignores the PA, and decides that their personal needs are more important than complying with social courtesies. Quite apart from being selfish, these people are of course stupid - they believe that neither we, nor anybody else notices (we have an empty seat print-out). I take particular pleasure in turfing them out and back to their original seat, at high volume, thereby causing maximum embarrassment.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK. East Mids.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also remind them that if they have a special meal booked, an change seat, it is their responsibility to advise the crew of their new location.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
As a Load Controller, I am quite perturbed that Cabin Crew sometimes allow this.
The Final Loadsheet on an allocated seating flight; uses the allocated seating distribution along with where baggage and cargo is loaded to calculate settings used for positioning the Stab Trim for Take Off.
The cabin crew and indeed these passengers that decide to move around the cabin without permission are changing the trim of the aircraft to that being set for take Off. On, many larger aircraft this effect may be neglidgeable.
However, they don't know if the aircraft may be close to trim limits already before anyone moves! Also on smaller aircraft a move by two or three passengers may well take the aircraft out of trim!
The Final Loadsheet on an allocated seating flight; uses the allocated seating distribution along with where baggage and cargo is loaded to calculate settings used for positioning the Stab Trim for Take Off.
The cabin crew and indeed these passengers that decide to move around the cabin without permission are changing the trim of the aircraft to that being set for take Off. On, many larger aircraft this effect may be neglidgeable.
However, they don't know if the aircraft may be close to trim limits already before anyone moves! Also on smaller aircraft a move by two or three passengers may well take the aircraft out of trim!
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
out of trim the CC will allow them to move round in the trim zones but they won't let them move trim zones without talking to the FD before departure.
A transfer across the cabin won't effect anything of course.
And even if they do move a zone it only takes 30 seconds to knock up a new trim sheet in the front to check it.
A transfer across the cabin won't effect anything of course.
And even if they do move a zone it only takes 30 seconds to knock up a new trim sheet in the front to check it.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They usually get told before boarding starts if they can spread them out or not. Usually led by how much baggage/freight is in the rear hold.
And most company's have a zone head count just to check people haven't moved if the aircraft has a problem with being trim sensitive.
So you would get a bit of paper with the aircraft and zones depicted and the number of seats full in each zone. Then you just check that you have the required number in each zone.
A lot of load controllers just take what's given and if its inside the envelope they release it. Where as crew want the weight further back. So tell the CC to chuck a few to the rear trim zone. Each type will have a rule of thumb with what movement causes what amount of index change.
And most company's have a zone head count just to check people haven't moved if the aircraft has a problem with being trim sensitive.
So you would get a bit of paper with the aircraft and zones depicted and the number of seats full in each zone. Then you just check that you have the required number in each zone.
A lot of load controllers just take what's given and if its inside the envelope they release it. Where as crew want the weight further back. So tell the CC to chuck a few to the rear trim zone. Each type will have a rule of thumb with what movement causes what amount of index change.
Last edited by mad_jock; 3rd Dec 2013 at 18:39.
Tightslot - seems a sensible approach, but not one that I have come across before, not having had the pleasure of flying with your particular company.
I was really only referring to moving across an aisle rather than back or forwards 20 rows, which, as has been stated, is not going to affect the trim of a wide-bodied aircraft.
I was really only referring to moving across an aisle rather than back or forwards 20 rows, which, as has been stated, is not going to affect the trim of a wide-bodied aircraft.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Mad Jock,
I'm well aware most airlines have good procedures in place to brief Cabin Crews what cabin moves may be allowed, however the OP's experience in that 8 passengers that had rear cabin zone seats swapped them to forward cabin zone seats is quite a trim change!
However, if this change is communicated and approved by the flight deck crew then all is well.
This Load Contoller aims to get the aircraft as near as possible to optimum trim by blocking seats if necessary and adjusting the Baggage and cargo loading to suit if possible. However, this work is sometime undone by check-in unblocking some of the seats to please passengers requests etc.
I'm well aware most airlines have good procedures in place to brief Cabin Crews what cabin moves may be allowed, however the OP's experience in that 8 passengers that had rear cabin zone seats swapped them to forward cabin zone seats is quite a trim change!
However, if this change is communicated and approved by the flight deck crew then all is well.
This Load Contoller aims to get the aircraft as near as possible to optimum trim by blocking seats if necessary and adjusting the Baggage and cargo loading to suit if possible. However, this work is sometime undone by check-in unblocking some of the seats to please passengers requests etc.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a recent short KLM flight, we were told that we should stay in our designated seats until the seatbelt signs were off, and that if we wanted to move after that, we needed to check with cc first, for trim reasons.
Two or three people completely ignored these instructions (worrying when the express reason given relates to safety - that level of ignorance/arrogance disturbs me) and were sent back to their original seats VERY loudly by the cc.
Two or three people completely ignored these instructions (worrying when the express reason given relates to safety - that level of ignorance/arrogance disturbs me) and were sent back to their original seats VERY loudly by the cc.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OoT it depends on the aircraft type. If its a rear engine type and essentially empty the FD will have told the crew they don't care.
And its good to see a committed load controller that takes pride in their work.
As Octopussy gives a good example people are led by what they have seen in the past. So for me personally I think there should be an industry standard not to allow it.
And its good to see a committed load controller that takes pride in their work.
As Octopussy gives a good example people are led by what they have seen in the past. So for me personally I think there should be an industry standard not to allow it.
@Tightslot. I was wondering about the logic behind the requirement to return to the original seat - wouldn't be a trim issue given your high load factors and the negligible longitudinal and lateral displacement, no longer a catering issue.
FA offered me 36H (from 37H) recently vacated by a lady who had moved to 36G. She was insistent in "wishing to comply with the regulations" and reclaim her seat. FA smiled in knowing sort-of way....
FA offered me 36H (from 37H) recently vacated by a lady who had moved to 36G. She was insistent in "wishing to comply with the regulations" and reclaim her seat. FA smiled in knowing sort-of way....