Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Go-around question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Sep 2013, 11:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Everything is under control.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go-around question

Something I've been curious about for a while . . . not sure how to ask or the terminology, so forgive me.

If an aircraft has to go-around because another aircraft improperly impeded it (like staying on the runway too long), can the airline of the go-around aircraft sue the other airline for monetary damages? (Fuel, salaries, screwing up the day's schedule, etc.)
Eboy is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 11:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No! Please don't suggest it!
fireflybob is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 08:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malaga
Posts: 161
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Something I've been curious about for a while . . . not sure how to ask or the terminology, so forgive me.

If an aircraft has to go-around because another aircraft improperly impeded it (like staying on the runway too long), can the airline of the go-around aircraft sue the other airline for monetary damages? (Fuel, salaries, screwing up the day's schedule, etc.)
Thanks for your question, Mr O'Leary. We'll get back to you
farci is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 10:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The EU Compensation Regulation 261 specifically provides that airlines paying compensation/care can attempt to recover said costs from third parties. In the 10 years (almost) it's been in effect not one case has reached the courts seeking such redress.

Do we really want third parties to act irresponsibly to avoid lawsuits?
ExXB is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 12:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just what the world needs - another reason to sue - not.
Octopussy2 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 14:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Considering you would need an enquiry to unpick whether it was an ATC or an aircraft caused problem in each case it is never going to be worth the effort.

While the accountants may worry about the average one or two percent added to operating cost due to GAs of various causes, each individual case typically costs hundreds rather than thousands (aircraft dependent obviously) and around 10 minutes in time.

Is that worth a lawyer? Especially when you know your victim will make a point of coming after you when it's your turn to screw up. Everyone makes mistakes and sometimes it is better to just live with it.
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 15:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We had a go-around last night. Apparently there was a medical emergency on the aircraft behind us. We went around, more like 20 minutes but GVA has mountains on both sides, but who was to blame? ATC for requesting it? The aircraft behind? The sick passenger?

The event cost me (at least) CHF25 as I missed my connecting bus and had to take a taxi but that's life, isn't it?

Last edited by ExXB; 9th Sep 2013 at 15:42. Reason: their, there the're ... I should know the difference by now
ExXB is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2013, 15:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If an aircraft has to go-around because another aircraft improperly impeded it (like staying on the runway too long)
One can only make "best efforts" to vacate the runway, so it would be pretty hard to attach any blame to an alleged slow vacate.

A frequent cause of a G/A is an unstabilised approach. You can be sure the crew in the subsequent PA will find another reason for the GA
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2013, 03:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 62
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've only ever had one GA where I saw the other aircraft. I'm told, possibly incorrectly, that if PAX can see the other plane in the sky, its not the GA you want. (it cast a beaut shadow over us as we flew on different paths rather sharply. most becoming and pretty. I would include claims I saw about 35 rows of 'the scream' by munch here, but that would be like a fishermans lie. I just saw metal very close)

On the whole, if I was the Airline and one of these got reported to me, I probably *would* be wanting to put their number into some Database and do a cost settlement on brown-trouser cleaning later on, but then you see.. it probably happens 50/50 the other way too. So in the end, I suspect that these things don't go into a least-cost settlement bin, because frequent offendors should be de-listed, and anything else is zero sum so why invent a mechanism?
geeohgeegeeoh is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2013, 14:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K.I.S.S.

Ten characters required, the answer is NO.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2013, 15:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
geeoh, etc. If you fly from a dual runway airfield and become involved in a go-around you may well see another aircraft departing off the other runway very close. However, there are good chaps and chapesses in the Tower who are paid to sort such problems so don't lose any sleep.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2013, 17:16
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
geeohgeegeeoh,
If you were flying a parallel approach into Sydney you'd see the other aircraft OK, esp an A380
Don't know if it's permissible to put the BigBus //l to another; they weren't invented when I did my last PRM training session.
Basil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.