Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Turbulence rocks Continental flight

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Turbulence rocks Continental flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd August 2009 | 10:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Turbulence rocks Continental flight

Minor news story only, if anyone interested.

From CNN.

Severe turbulence shook a Continental Airlines flight Monday, injuring at least 10 passengers and forcing the aircraft to divert to Miami, Florida, an airport fire official said.

Flight 128 was originally headed from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to Houston, Texas, but landed at Miami International Airport, the official said. Between 10 and 15 passengers were injured by the turbulence, but the official did not have details on their injuries.

The CNN Wire - Latest updates on top stories - CNN.com Blogs
Jetstream2008 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 11:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Passengers injured. A bit more than just the old 600 mph and 30 degrees rocking from side to side scenario then. Comes with the job for these guys though and seems to have been well handled.
Cacophonix is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 12:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Brazil
..

ITCZ ????
Gringobr is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 12:26
  #4 (permalink)  
bnt
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 755
Likes: 26
From: Dublin, Ireland. (No, I just live here.)
CNN is now saying 26 people received minor injuries. It happened 50 miles north of the Dominican Republic. Nothing dramatic on the weather that I can see.
bnt is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 14:27
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 2
From: New York
ITCZ

Inter Tropical Convergence Zone =lots of atmospheric energy & instability
please; keep your seat-belts fastened..
neilki is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 16:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: MAN UK
..."4 serious condition, 22 with bumps and bruises" - could have been avoided. Would be intersting to know how many of us who fly keep their seatbelt on even loosely fastened as I do, just in case, as there is little or no warning of clear air turbulence, for example...?
Rob1975 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 17:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
Another passenger, Fabio Ottolini, said some flight attendants who were standing in the aisles when the turbulence hit were thrown against the roof.

That's the real kicker here is it not - how do these unfortunate folks protect themselves in what seems to have been a sudden drop?
Mikey56 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 18:35
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 60
From: Anderlecht
What niggles me so much in these turbulence related threads are the righteous types banging on about keeping your seat belts loosely fastened. Whilst it's true that some pax don't do this, a great many do. However, where unexpected turbulence hits, it will always be the case that there are pax moving about the cabin for valid reasons. Therefore, no matter what, in such instances there will always be some pax who get caught out. They may very well have had their belts loosely fastened the rest of the time.
Avman is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 18:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Don't come undone

Rob1975, do you keep your seatbelt loosely fastened even when you visit the toilet?
The statistics don't always lie!

If Rob1975 keeps his seatbelt fastened throughout the flight, save for that trip to the cubicle he has a statistically insignificant chance of being injured by turbulence.

The cabin crew on the other, are generally standing, unrestrained and often pushing a heavy trolley. This fact coupled with their greater proximity to other hazards such as ovens, hot water etc. make them far more likey to be injured in that low probability (but still possible) CAT event.

Rob is right. Stay buckled, not too loosely if you can.
Cacophonix is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 19:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: MAN UK
righteous, moi? nah! ...just reckon most people DON'T wear their seatbelts loosely or otherwise as soon as the seatbelt light goes out! I was on a recent flight where the a/c slightly slowed just after leaving the taxiway, still 100m from the gate, still moving - more or less everyone stood up, opening the overhead lockers prompting CC to again say sit down, seatbelt sign is on etc.. no-one did!
Rob1975 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 19:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Patterson, NY
Not only do I keep my seatbelt securely fastened during all aspects of flight (aside from the very occasional relief trip) I also keep my hands securely fastened around the seat arms. This, in turn, creates that white-knuckled effect. Said white-knuckled effect lasts for the duration of any given flight. Can you say: fear of flying?!!!!!!
(Said death grip on seat arms and seatbelt tightened to the point of semi-suffocation is usually, however, mitigated by copious amounts of alcoholic beverages. Preferably served free of cost.)
rgbrock1 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 19:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Saigon
I had a good one not long since coming into LBA from Tenerife, a lively bit of chop on approach caught out a pax who'd decided the seatbelt lights didn't apply to him and went walkies to the toilet. A stern word from our (most junior) cc and an awakening crack to the elbow soon taught him the error of his ways.

More widely - when in cruise and with belt lights off this kind of thing is always going to happen if cat happens without warning. I was once told, in the space of two days, to encourage pax to walk up and down the aisle to prevent dvt while also advised to keep people plugged in if at all possible.

If the turb don't get em, the blocked up veins will
ex-XL-in-exile is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2009 | 21:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: No one's home...
touring the web, report from one of the pax said the Capt had advised they were entering an area of possible turbulence and had instructed the pax to return. Some did.. some didn't.

More touring.. about 2000 pax per year injured by turbulence. and in those cases 91% were NOT wearing seat belts.

CNN had some pictures of the interior with some pretty smashed up ceiling panels. Some oxy panels BROKEN and others smashed in. Considerable force obviously by the pax impacting the ceiling.
wileydog3 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 08:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Cairo
Just not true - I was on a 747 years ago that fell through a hole in the sky. There was no warning - no seat belt sign. I was wearing the seatbelt (though not tight) and felt it holding me in my seat. The cabin crew were off their feet. No one was hurt.

It can come out of nowhere.
SLF3b is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 08:33
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 347
From: London UK
Originally Posted by spannerhead
There's nothing silent about it! Prior to entering turbulance there's normally a 'bing bong' when the seatbelt signs illuminate.
Not at all. Pretty much the same happened to me (and doubtless has to others here). AA 767 LAX-LHR about 18 years ago, over the Rockies. Several pax and crew injured, diverted to Chicago to offload them (though no media attention). In the cruise with no seatbelt sign, crew in galley preparing meals. Suddenly vibration, pitch down, semi-recover, then really nose down - during which the seat belt light came on. Unfortunately one FA was already headed for the ceiling by that time, came back down onto pax seats. Incidentally, in that case I would say the bulk of pax around me were indeed wearing their belts loosely, just as stated in the safety briefing before departure.

Skipper said later that it came from nowhere, and he passed back ride reports to others following the same routing, who had similar experiences but with everyone secured.
WHBM is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 11:04
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Brazil
As an aside, even if belted you can still get injured by trolleys, CC and pax flying about.
belfrybat is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 11:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Objective reporting

Just thought you may like to know that GMTV here in England this morning reported the Bermuda Triangle as a possible cause and the interviewer suggested aircraft should avoid the ITCZ if it is so dangerous. Gotta love all that in-depth research!!
AugustusWhittle is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 11:25
  #18 (permalink)  

Rotate on this!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 403
Likes: 4
From: Aberdeen
Objective viewing

Don't watch GMTV
SLFguy is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 11:30
  #19 (permalink)  

Rotate on this!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 403
Likes: 4
From: Aberdeen
Oh boy... run while you have the chance r1fly.
SLFguy is offline  
Reply
Old 4th August 2009 | 11:44
  #20 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: _
r1fly - top tip, never comment on something that you can't spell.
dontdoit is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.