LCY-JFK BA001?
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean
LCY-JFK BA001?
Article from Business Traveller on the new BA Airbus A318 service and cabin configuration from London city to New York via Shannon (outbound.)
32 seats. Rumoured to be using the old Concorde flight numbers (001/002) as part of the premium branding.
32 seats. Rumoured to be using the old Concorde flight numbers (001/002) as part of the premium branding.
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 3
From: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Don't have a problem with recycling the BA1/2/3/4 callsigns, although ...
I doubt they'll be calling themselves 'The Speedbird Concorde One/Two/Three/Four' though! Maybe 'Speedbird Microbus Snail 1/2/3/4' requesting FL390, M0.78 (unless there is turbulence, in which case M0.76)
.
In reality allocated FL320 M0.78 to prevent disadvantaging 'normal' speed traffic across the pond.
I would not personally have bid for this fleet as a BA pilot (if I had still been on the fleet), the slow cruise, 2 engines, limited fuel options, night flight back to an 'interesting' LCY landing, no satcom, no CPDLC, twice a month rotation would have dissuaded me.
I hope it works out for the company, though, God knows we need to maximise all profit opportunities right now ....
I doubt they'll be calling themselves 'The Speedbird Concorde One/Two/Three/Four' though! Maybe 'Speedbird Microbus Snail 1/2/3/4' requesting FL390, M0.78 (unless there is turbulence, in which case M0.76)
.In reality allocated FL320 M0.78 to prevent disadvantaging 'normal' speed traffic across the pond.
I would not personally have bid for this fleet as a BA pilot (if I had still been on the fleet), the slow cruise, 2 engines, limited fuel options, night flight back to an 'interesting' LCY landing, no satcom, no CPDLC, twice a month rotation would have dissuaded me.
I hope it works out for the company, though, God knows we need to maximise all profit opportunities right now ....
FX Guru
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: Greenwich
There's been quite a chat going on about this on the LCY thread in Airlines, Airports and Routes, and yes, BA001 has been resurrected.
As I've said in that thread, there's quite a bit of interest from business pax on that route. Sadly my days of New York trips on business are over!
As I've said in that thread, there's quite a bit of interest from business pax on that route. Sadly my days of New York trips on business are over!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: LGW
DartHerald,
Prices start at £1100 (iirc). It goes up to £5000 if you want a fully flex ticket.
The aircraft will stop in Shannon to re-fuel and whilst this is going on, the passengers go through immigration procedures. This will inevitably save time when arriving at JFK, as passengers come through domestic arrivals.
Hope this clarifies some issues.
Gg
Prices start at £1100 (iirc). It goes up to £5000 if you want a fully flex ticket.
The aircraft will stop in Shannon to re-fuel and whilst this is going on, the passengers go through immigration procedures. This will inevitably save time when arriving at JFK, as passengers come through domestic arrivals.
Hope this clarifies some issues.
Gg
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 1
From: Ireland
Prices start at £1100 (iirc). It goes up to £5000 if you want a fully flex ticket.
However doing the same search on LHR-JFK on ba.com, I can find an £1,100 business class round trip fare. That's a pretty steep price difference...
C.
PS I see that the carbon emissions calculator on ba.com reckons that the emissions attributable to one of 32 seats on an A318 are exactly the same as for one of several hundred seats on a B777. I realise they have to simplify things but somehow I suspect this is not the case...
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: UK
Have been getting a little more info on this LCY-JFK operation from another thread.
.
Appears crew start and finnish duty at LHR/pilots and LGW/CC, pilots slip in SNN, plus pilots/CC stby numbers.
.
I took a look at ba.com and looked at LON-NYC prices in Oct/Nov, the price diff between LHR and LCY is a lot, suggest anyone is sitting down should they have a look at the prices.
.
Those green shoots had better grow very quick if this operation is to have any future.
.
Appears crew start and finnish duty at LHR/pilots and LGW/CC, pilots slip in SNN, plus pilots/CC stby numbers.
.
I took a look at ba.com and looked at LON-NYC prices in Oct/Nov, the price diff between LHR and LCY is a lot, suggest anyone is sitting down should they have a look at the prices.
.
Those green shoots had better grow very quick if this operation is to have any future.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: LGW
Joetom,
Just comparing prices would make LON-NYC cheaper from LHR. However...
There are benefits flying from LCY:
1. Turn up 15mins before departure
2. Wifi/texting available on LCY flight means pax can keep working if they wish
3. Going through JFK domestic arrivals - saves a lot of time
4. Only 32 seats - one can get the feel of private jet without the massive cost.
Basically, the LCY-JFK route is set up for the folks who work in the city. They (at least some) used to get to NYC by private jet. The banks/other businesses can't afford it anymore, so a major bank requested BA to set up this route as it will be from later this year. They have given their financial backing for the next 2 years.
Also, please bear in mind that these flights are pretty much fully booked for the first 6 months.
Gg
Just comparing prices would make LON-NYC cheaper from LHR. However...
There are benefits flying from LCY:
1. Turn up 15mins before departure
2. Wifi/texting available on LCY flight means pax can keep working if they wish
3. Going through JFK domestic arrivals - saves a lot of time
4. Only 32 seats - one can get the feel of private jet without the massive cost.
Basically, the LCY-JFK route is set up for the folks who work in the city. They (at least some) used to get to NYC by private jet. The banks/other businesses can't afford it anymore, so a major bank requested BA to set up this route as it will be from later this year. They have given their financial backing for the next 2 years.
Also, please bear in mind that these flights are pretty much fully booked for the first 6 months.
Gg
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: UK
How does landing at Shannon and doing immigration there save time? I would have thought that the flight time non-stop from London in a widebody is considerably less than on the stopping LCY route, surely giving more than ample time to clear immigration in NY quicker than doing the LCY route. Has anybody got the timings to prove or disprove this?
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: UK
I have, many times. Last time I was there was pretty good, took about 15 minutes to get through, although I have been there for an hour as well. But my point is, how much quicker will a flight leaving LHR at the same time as the LCY flight get to NY? Just trying to determine if it makes much difference in how soon you actually get landside in NY. I have flown non-stop from Dublin to Boston and clearing immigration in Dublin in that case was a huge time saver. But when it is part of a stop from London, is any time saved?
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Nick R has raised some points that had occurred to me too. The stop at Shannon will negate any time saved in queueing at JFK (though the immigation officials will probably be a bit more polite too).
Another thought that springs to mind is just how often will the JFK-LCY flight actually land there? I'm a regular earlt morning departee from Dublin, and the early Air France flights to City are frequently delayed by hours, usually down to the weather at City as far as I'm aware. How often will the JFK arrival end up being diverted? And where to?
If the flight does actually land at LCY, then there are clearly benefits to the sponsoring bank in the the west-east flight direction. It's no more than 30 minutes from the wheels hitting the ground to getting to the office in Canary Wharf. Maybe it's the convenience in that direction that they want?
Another thought that springs to mind is just how often will the JFK-LCY flight actually land there? I'm a regular earlt morning departee from Dublin, and the early Air France flights to City are frequently delayed by hours, usually down to the weather at City as far as I'm aware. How often will the JFK arrival end up being diverted? And where to?
If the flight does actually land at LCY, then there are clearly benefits to the sponsoring bank in the the west-east flight direction. It's no more than 30 minutes from the wheels hitting the ground to getting to the office in Canary Wharf. Maybe it's the convenience in that direction that they want?
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: On the western edge of The Moor
Seems to me that the flight is primarily landing at Shannon for fuel, as it is unable to take off from LCY with a full load.
It seems that the opportunity is being taken, whilst it has to be there, to clear US immigration; otherwise the passengers would still see that additional time at Shannon and then have to, possibly, wait to clear immigration at JFK.
It seems that the opportunity is being taken, whilst it has to be there, to clear US immigration; otherwise the passengers would still see that additional time at Shannon and then have to, possibly, wait to clear immigration at JFK.
Joined: Aug 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: South of France
On a random date from the BA website (Thursday 17 December 2009), the scheduled outbound flying time from LCY is a whopping 9hrs 45mins. From LHR on the same day, the outbound time is 7hrs 35mins. Add to that eyewatering fares of, it would appear, up to £5600 return and you have to wonder how much time or real money is being saved?
Of course, if as suggested this is actually some sort of "semi-private jet" arrangement with the banks then that's all right then isn't it? If true, nice to see the banks being prudent as they prepare for recovery.
Of course, if as suggested this is actually some sort of "semi-private jet" arrangement with the banks then that's all right then isn't it? If true, nice to see the banks being prudent as they prepare for recovery.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,173
Likes: 0
From: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
How often will the JFK arrival end up being diverted? And where to?
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
BA have a little operation in West London where some other JFK flights go. I think it's called Heathrow. Can't believe we have yet another thread on all this, it's been done to the death.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,173
Likes: 0
From: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
It can't be helped. There is no way to fly into LCY when the weather is out, as it occasionally is. That's one of those things people used to be able to deal with.
Will BA get you to London without diverting? Yes, though the wrong side of town.
Is Heathrow impossibly far from the Wharf? No, it's a longer cab ride and less than ideal, but you'll still be in London after your flight and on your way to a meeting.
Exactly what do you suggest BA do? The weather IS beyond their, and all airlines control. Is it possilbe to be grateful for a good opportunity to fly into the heart of docklands weather permitting for the firsy time from JFK?
Or let's moan about the odd occasion when the airfield is out due to fog.
Can no one deal with the realities of life these days? Truly any persepctive is that rarest gem. If you read the rather long thread on this in Airlines, Airports and Routes you'll see it is being well marketed at certain customers and underwritten by one in particular.
Will BA get you to London without diverting? Yes, though the wrong side of town.
Is Heathrow impossibly far from the Wharf? No, it's a longer cab ride and less than ideal, but you'll still be in London after your flight and on your way to a meeting.
Exactly what do you suggest BA do? The weather IS beyond their, and all airlines control. Is it possilbe to be grateful for a good opportunity to fly into the heart of docklands weather permitting for the firsy time from JFK?
Or let's moan about the odd occasion when the airfield is out due to fog.
Can no one deal with the realities of life these days? Truly any persepctive is that rarest gem. If you read the rather long thread on this in Airlines, Airports and Routes you'll see it is being well marketed at certain customers and underwritten by one in particular.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
From: In transit
Checking random dates, the lowest return fare I could find is £1649 base fare which with the fuel surcharge (£156 - which should be part of the base fare) and taxes totals £1949.60
That's a non-refundable non-changeable ticket (use it or lose it)
The fully flexible unrestricted is £5050.60
That's a non-refundable non-changeable ticket (use it or lose it)
The fully flexible unrestricted is £5050.60