Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

What IS the accepted security 'pat down' search pattern?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

What IS the accepted security 'pat down' search pattern?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2008, 15:21
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 77
Posts: 1,267
Received 37 Likes on 17 Posts
The best security I've seen in 67 flights this year has to be Phoenix. Don't put your bag down - you'll be moving so fast you hardly have time to pick it up! Friendly, and efficient and not the miseries that Heathrow and Frankfurt have. I rate Arlanda and Nice too. At the bottom of the list, Heathrow, Frankfurt and Copenhagen.
radeng is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 09:07
  #42 (permalink)  
LH2
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting, while searching for something totally unrelated, I found the following reaction to an earlier comment of mine regarding the illegality of pat-down and bag searches by civilians, as implemented at many airports across the EU: (please excuse the grammar, I'm quoting verbatim)

For you 5 minutes of protecting your dignity, for everyone else in the queue behind
I take that to mean that by refusing an illegal search, everyone in the queue gets delayed. That's an interesting point of view: let's all agree to have our hard-earned rights violated blatantly and systematically, and be treated in a derogatory manner so that we can get to the duty free with five minutes to spare. Is it possible that there might be something just not quite right here?

Is there actually a physical difference between an airport cop searching you or your bag compared to the rent-a-cop by the machine.
Apart from the difference between dealing with a trained professional acting within the limits of his authority for a well-defined and objectively beneficial purpose, and being confronted by an untrained, uneducated yob who is directed to do something under false pretenses? Yes, there is an "actual physical difference" (and congratulations on the spelling this time)

Lastly:

Incidentally, try your ‘legal authority’ in some countries and you’ll have more than just a pat down
Such as? Would that be anywhere in Europe, Latin America, the Mediterranean basin, or perhaps one of the Middle Eastern countries I haven't visited this year (which leaves out Iran, the UAE, Egypt and Israel) in the about 90 sectors I have flown commercially so far since January? That's obviously not counting private or chartered flights.

As a matter of fact, I've found only two places where airport contractors made a deal out of it, one a small regional airport in Norway (I got an apology from the airport manager), the other CDG (where the employee in question initially thought I was racially motivated).

The most pleasant and reassuring security (not "security") check? Flying LY inbound TLV, as usual I note that in certain countries outside Israel, if extended questioning or any physical search is deemed necessary, this is always done in the presence of the local police, who are summoned by LY "for your own protection". The plod will ask you if you are being treated correctly and will witness the entire interaction between you and LY's agents (whose level of training and professionalism is way beyond anything you will ever see anywhere else).

And that's all for now. I found the post entertaining enough, in all its blissful naïveté, that I had to respond. I do apologise to its author that I will no longer be able to read his reactions, amusing as they might be, but he has made it to my rather large killfile due to the quality of his discourse, poor expression, and lack of thoughtful opinions.
LH2 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 10:20
  #43 (permalink)  
Bex
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere between HERE .... and HERE
Age: 53
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do have to ask the question (being the post creator) of what is so different about you that you feel above the security requirements of the airports? Does this mean you also argue that your human rights have been violated with retail security guards, traffic wardens, lollipop ladies/men, car park attendants etc. etc.?

When we travel by air we have to accept that each airport has it's own set of rules that we know we have to abide to (whether it suits us or not).

And as the post author, it's always interesting to see how quite often the point raised get's pushed aside for a bit of a slanging match, I assume (but will stand corrected) mostly between grown men.
FWOF is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 17:43
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FWOF,

There is something magic about PPRuNe because I was looking to contribute to this thread and suddenly it re-appeared on the top of the page.


I was in Berlin last Saturday and I did witnessed a similar pattern of search on a lady just this time it has her backside that was grabbed (sp?). I paid special attention because of your thread. I think the way security people behave in the airports is: "my way or the highway". So there are no limits on what how close the search might be.

No regarding prvate security in other areas, I would argue that a rent-a-cop in a mall or any other permises can be ignored with very little consequences. In the airport they can call the police give their version of the story and you are on your way to Cuba in no time.

Rwy in Sight
Rwy in Sight is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 13:44
  #45 (permalink)  
DrG
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wanting to seek clarification.

I recently flew out of FRA.
I beeped due to my shoes and was directed for a pat search.
During the pat down the male staff member cupped his open hand onto my penis and testicles and lifted both up with a squeezing motion.

I complained that I felt this was not appropriate and asked for the manager.
Sadly this made the male staff member annoyed in which he leaned over me and asked if I want a cocktail in a sarcastic fashion as he got the supervisor.

Now rude behaviour aside, the staff there report that this "control" of my body was part of a normal search.

Here in Australia a direct cupped hand and squeeze to the penis and scrotum is considered beyond a standard search.

Is anyone able to direct me to documents or even just explain if this could be considered excessive?

My phone calls to Frankfurt Airport Security have been with little result and I am now wondering if I will have to go to a higher level to see if this was beyond the call of duty.

Any help is gratefully appreciated.

Regards

Dr George - Australia
DrG is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2009, 02:38
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: london
Age: 40
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
asked if I want a cocktail in a sarcastic fashion as he got the supervisor.
Cheeky bugger.

During the pat down the male staff member cupped his open hand onto my penis and testicles and lifted both up with a squeezing motion.
I suppose he had cocks on the brain. A cock in a cup is not quite the same as a cocktail. Mind you both could have squeezed lemons.

Last edited by craigbell; 4th Feb 2009 at 03:20.
craigbell is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2009, 04:36
  #47 (permalink)  
DrG
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seriously tho is anyone able to help define what a normal search consists of and when it has crossed the line?
DrG is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2009, 08:41
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is acceptable may well vary from country to country. Certainly the most thorough pat downs I've experienced have been at German airports.
montag is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.