New BA carry on rules
Thread Starter
New BA carry on rules
See new BA carry on rules below.
Around 35kg of hand luggage is now allowed per passenger. (23kg for a bag and no recommended weight limit for a briefcase)
This is good news for the business traveller in general, but with every ounce/gramm of excess checked baggage being charged at the gate what is the chance of long haul flights becoming top heavy as budget travellers avoid excess charges?
How much can the bins safely hold?
Surely a couple of hundred 23kg bags belong in the hold?
Or are they grooming SLF to eventually accept no checked baggage at all?
Mickjoebill
From BA
[COLOR="Blue"]"We've got some great news: thanks to new guidelines from the UK Department for Transport, we're increasing our cabin bag allowance. As of 7 January 2008 you will be able to carry two pieces of hand baggage through security when departing or transferring from London Heathrow, London City, Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow or Manchester airports.
The British Airways hand baggage allowance is as follows:
•
One bag no bigger than 56 cm x 45 cm x 25 cm (22 inches x 17.5 inches x 9.85 inches) (including wheels, pockets and handles)
•
In addition, one briefcase or laptop sized bag
The maximum bag weight is 23kg and you must be able to lift the bag into the overhead lockers in the aircraft cabin unaided.
The restrictions on carrying liquids have not changed so make sure that any liquid containers you plan to carry do not exceed 100ml and that they are in a clear, re-sealable plastic bag.
Other UK airports are expected to phase out restrictions in line with the new guidelines. Until this happens, the one-bag allowance still stands for all other UK airports. If you are flying from or transferring through other UK airports, it's worth checking with the transferring airline or the airport operator before you travel. Also check if you are flying from another UK airport and transferring through Heathrow.
I hope you find the increased allowance makes travelling that much easier and more convenient. Thank you for flying with us and we look forward to seeing you again soon.
Warm regards,
Executive Club Manager"
ends
Around 35kg of hand luggage is now allowed per passenger. (23kg for a bag and no recommended weight limit for a briefcase)
This is good news for the business traveller in general, but with every ounce/gramm of excess checked baggage being charged at the gate what is the chance of long haul flights becoming top heavy as budget travellers avoid excess charges?
How much can the bins safely hold?
Surely a couple of hundred 23kg bags belong in the hold?
Or are they grooming SLF to eventually accept no checked baggage at all?
Mickjoebill
From BA
[COLOR="Blue"]"We've got some great news: thanks to new guidelines from the UK Department for Transport, we're increasing our cabin bag allowance. As of 7 January 2008 you will be able to carry two pieces of hand baggage through security when departing or transferring from London Heathrow, London City, Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow or Manchester airports.
The British Airways hand baggage allowance is as follows:
•
One bag no bigger than 56 cm x 45 cm x 25 cm (22 inches x 17.5 inches x 9.85 inches) (including wheels, pockets and handles)
•
In addition, one briefcase or laptop sized bag
The maximum bag weight is 23kg and you must be able to lift the bag into the overhead lockers in the aircraft cabin unaided.
The restrictions on carrying liquids have not changed so make sure that any liquid containers you plan to carry do not exceed 100ml and that they are in a clear, re-sealable plastic bag.
Other UK airports are expected to phase out restrictions in line with the new guidelines. Until this happens, the one-bag allowance still stands for all other UK airports. If you are flying from or transferring through other UK airports, it's worth checking with the transferring airline or the airport operator before you travel. Also check if you are flying from another UK airport and transferring through Heathrow.
I hope you find the increased allowance makes travelling that much easier and more convenient. Thank you for flying with us and we look forward to seeing you again soon.
Warm regards,
Executive Club Manager"
ends
Last edited by mickjoebill; 5th Jan 2008 at 17:55.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northport, NW England
Age: 44
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whilst one commends the new rule as a return to liberty it leaves us still with the futile 100ml rule on liquids.
Also may I add the liquid rule is only applied in asia on international routes.... not domestic? Am I missing something here apart from my toothpaste?
Also may I add the liquid rule is only applied in asia on international routes.... not domestic? Am I missing something here apart from my toothpaste?
N4790P
Whilst one commends the new rule as a return to liberty it leaves us still with the futile 100ml rule on liquids.
Also may I add the liquid rule is only applied in asia on international routes.... not domestic? Am I missing something here apart from my toothpaste?
Also may I add the liquid rule is only applied in asia on international routes.... not domestic? Am I missing something here apart from my toothpaste?
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YPPH
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely 23Kgs for hand luggage has to be a typo. None of the internal comms mention 23Kgs but it does specify 23Kgs on ba.com as long as you can lift it yourself. Who would be able to do that in a crowded aisle? There may be space for 5 wheelie bags in a locker but I really doubt it could support 115kgs. Would you want that over your head?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely 23Kgs for hand luggage has to be a typo
Mind you, I am still not too happy about having 14-15 kg bags over my head!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YPPH
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still doesn't sound right though and that line doesn't appear on BA News Interactive or in the article on the front of the latest BA News, so it does make me wonder. I've checked in LOS with trolley bags over 20Kgs being passed off as handluggage, so it can be done. If I hadn't weighed the bags, we would never have known. I've also crewed plenty of LOS with all sorts of things being brought on board, including engine parts.
If you're right and it IS going to be 23Kgs, that actually might save some time in the terminal but I'm really surprised the unions have agreed.
If you're right and it IS going to be 23Kgs, that actually might save some time in the terminal but I'm really surprised the unions have agreed.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're right and it IS going to be 23Kgs, that actually might save some time in the terminal but I'm really surprised the unions have agreed.
Personally, I always felt Virgin was right in sticking to its guns on cabin baggage and banning wheelie bags from the cabin! (Two reasons: (a) The pressure transmitted through the wheels does severe damage to the cranium if the bag falls and (b) the "trolley bag" allows passengers to carry heavy stuff on board with relative ease. If you had to lug a grip or a shoulder bag around the terminal, you would only pack it with things essential for the flight!
Unfortunately for us all, commercial pressure won!
Overhead bins are weight-limited to a certified figure.
(I seem to recall a labelled max weight of 70kg on B737. Can anyone confirm this?)
Let's say you have 3 (or even) 4 items in a 744 (drop-down) overhead bin. That's perhaps 100k.
Question 1
Who's going to close the bin?
Question 2
Who's brave enough to sit under it?
Not me, for sure...
(I seem to recall a labelled max weight of 70kg on B737. Can anyone confirm this?)
Let's say you have 3 (or even) 4 items in a 744 (drop-down) overhead bin. That's perhaps 100k.
Question 1
Who's going to close the bin?
Question 2
Who's brave enough to sit under it?
Not me, for sure...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys just don't get it, do you ? This puts BA in a position where they can - finally! - deal with the baggage handlers the way they should be dealt with. If everyone can bring what amounts to ALL bags on board, these people cannot hold BA or the travelers to ransom any more 
Well done, BA, you just might get me back as customer
Well done, BA, you just might get me back as customer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YPPH
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, humble pie time for me.
I confirmed it with Internal Comms, passengers WILL be allowed to bring 23kgs board, as long it the bag meets the dimensions.
So, yes, it will hopefully reduce lost baggage claims. Time will tell whether it will lead to other problems. I'm choosing to say positive over this one - maybe that's the hypoxia talking.
I confirmed it with Internal Comms, passengers WILL be allowed to bring 23kgs board, as long it the bag meets the dimensions.
So, yes, it will hopefully reduce lost baggage claims. Time will tell whether it will lead to other problems. I'm choosing to say positive over this one - maybe that's the hypoxia talking.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't see the restriction on wheeled bags anywhere on the Virgin website. Anyone got a pointer?
There was no such restriction when I was working for VS. As long as the bag fitted the dimensions was weighed no more than 6kgs in Economy, it didn't really matter.
Certainly, in 1997 Virgin was still rejecting wheelie bags, but BA started to relax and so did BMI. The legal culpability for passenger injury from insecure overhead items has also legally shifted from the airline to the bag's owner!
Commercial pressure by EasyJet removing any weight restriction has led to the free for all we are seeing now!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tend to agree with the sentiment "if you can't lift it don't expect us to" , but as a 4ft 10 ish person I have severe problems on a lot of commercial jets. I flew recently from LHR to YYZ on AC's new 777 in first class. There is no place to put your bag under the seat in the new suite arrangement (this is my usual solution to the can't reach bin scenario) and I seriously could not reach the overhead bin , my husband was stuck over the other side of the cabin (we didn't realise that although the seats are side by side on the seat map , you can't get to or talk to each other!!) . He had to walk all the way round , through the galley and back up to put it in for me!
Personally I think all carry on baggage should have to fit under the seat , I get very nervous with those heavy bags above my head!
Having said that I also think that planes should be designed so that there is room under the seat .
Personally I think all carry on baggage should have to fit under the seat , I get very nervous with those heavy bags above my head!
Having said that I also think that planes should be designed so that there is room under the seat .
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North America
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I brought my laptop onboard a Cx flight with some important documents in the laptop bag, it ended up being 14kg, heavier than my check-in. If anyone carries a 23kg bag (ie. not on wheels), they're in for some pain.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: london
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have never had a wheelie case refused as cabin baggage by VS, so the rule must be very old.
One important point is this, just because a wheelie bag is used, it does not imply the luggage is heavier than say, someone with a holdall. I use a wheelie case whlst travelling on business, to avoid knackering my arms, as often changing flights three times in one day involves a great deal of walking and standing around. My wheelie usually weighs around 7kg max, because I still have to lift it at some point. Any airline refusing a wheelie case would immediately lose my custom.
I accept some pax take liberties with the weight of their hand luggage, but it is completely wrong to assume that all wheelie cases are really heavy, whilst anything else would be ok.
In addition, my wheelie case is actually below the max size guidelines. It's actually smaller than many holdalls.
All we need now is for the lunatics in charge to ditch the stupid liquid nonsense, although that seems unlikely with the newly announced (absolutely bizarre) battery limits just announced by the loonies in charge in the US
One important point is this, just because a wheelie bag is used, it does not imply the luggage is heavier than say, someone with a holdall. I use a wheelie case whlst travelling on business, to avoid knackering my arms, as often changing flights three times in one day involves a great deal of walking and standing around. My wheelie usually weighs around 7kg max, because I still have to lift it at some point. Any airline refusing a wheelie case would immediately lose my custom.
I accept some pax take liberties with the weight of their hand luggage, but it is completely wrong to assume that all wheelie cases are really heavy, whilst anything else would be ok.
In addition, my wheelie case is actually below the max size guidelines. It's actually smaller than many holdalls.
All we need now is for the lunatics in charge to ditch the stupid liquid nonsense, although that seems unlikely with the newly announced (absolutely bizarre) battery limits just announced by the loonies in charge in the US
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the CAA recommended a maximum 5 kg limit as cabin baggage was responsible for most of the fatalities in the passenger cabin
I think airlines/handling agents should be a bit braver and remove more oversize/overweight handluggage at the gate, to be returned immediately on disembarkation, as per many of the smaller regional aircraft types. The safest place for heavy and hard objects is the hold in my opinion.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Why was this never enforced? It makes me quite nervous to see the size and apparent weight of some of the luggage some people carry on. 23kgs is frankly ridiculous!
In the event of a jet crashing into a motorway embankment, then I would not rely on 5kg baggage to save my life.
Heavy bags falling out of a locker would be more of a concern for me.
In the event of a jet crashing into a motorway embankment, then I would not rely on 5kg baggage to save my life.
Heavy bags falling out of a locker would be more of a concern for me.