BA Baggage rules change again
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Out of a bag
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA Baggage rules change again
It would seem that BA have changed their baggage policy again. Last week when I checked, it was (to the USA) 2 items max 23kgs each, with those who had booked prior to Feb able to have up to 32kgs.
Reviewing their website tonight to see what the excess charges are, I was surprised to see that they will accept an item up to 32 kgs for anybody, free of charge, until Nov 2008. After that, it will be a flat £25 for between 23kgs and 32kgs.
https://www.britishairways.com/trave...k/public/en_gb
Reviewing their website tonight to see what the excess charges are, I was surprised to see that they will accept an item up to 32 kgs for anybody, free of charge, until Nov 2008. After that, it will be a flat £25 for between 23kgs and 32kgs.
https://www.britishairways.com/trave...k/public/en_gb
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a climb down and may result in direct industrial action across Europe next year unless IATA pulls its finger out and enforces the 23kg upper limit for all airlines operating from/to EC countries.
British Airways was full prepared to enforce the 23kg upper limit for Health and safety reasons, but is understandably reluctant to be the first and only carrier adhering to the HSE recommendations.
Meanwhile, more long-term back injuries, torn ligaments, sprains and strains among the loaders - but, hey, that's okay! We're getting £25 a throw for heavy bags!
............and the nub of it is, those idiots (usually American - and that's not a racist remark, it's because the USA was the country that introduced the 2 pieces at 32kg each baggage allowance, so Americans, being thick, think it's compulsory to have 2 bags at 32kgs each! To those who think packing heavy bags is okay then wonder why their fragile items inside the bag become damaged! (Just try handling a 32kg bag carefully!)
British Airways was full prepared to enforce the 23kg upper limit for Health and safety reasons, but is understandably reluctant to be the first and only carrier adhering to the HSE recommendations.
Meanwhile, more long-term back injuries, torn ligaments, sprains and strains among the loaders - but, hey, that's okay! We're getting £25 a throw for heavy bags!
............and the nub of it is, those idiots (usually American - and that's not a racist remark, it's because the USA was the country that introduced the 2 pieces at 32kg each baggage allowance, so Americans, being thick, think it's compulsory to have 2 bags at 32kgs each! To those who think packing heavy bags is okay then wonder why their fragile items inside the bag become damaged! (Just try handling a 32kg bag carefully!)
Paxing All Over The World
usually American - and that's not a racist remark
OK. As you were.
Retract Pedant Flap to Zero
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bealine- I'm at a loss at your posting. Those 'idiots' (who are incidently your 'customers' who pay your wages) have either been allowed 32 kgs, or they will be hammered for excess baggage. But up to 32 kgs is acceptable. It might be funny to drop the cases -I have seen it being done many times, and also many times watched as the loaders purposely dropped the crew bags too, but it is obscene and dishonest. If you can't handle the baggage, don't do the job, and don't take the pay if you are going to destroy people's possessions intentionally as a way of 'getting back' at them. It seems a particularly spiteful Brit thing to do- maybe because those 2 perishing unions that run aviation in the UK have too much power.
Your posting is a disgrace. You are posting in a forum of your customers, and you can use expletives on them? Shame on you.
Your posting is a disgrace. You are posting in a forum of your customers, and you can use expletives on them? Shame on you.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Warwickshire
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bealine,
the Health and Safety weight limit imposed by the government is 32Kg, not 23Kg.
Ba are just trying to screw over yet again, the hard working people who pay the luggage stealers, sorry, "handlers" wages.
the Health and Safety weight limit imposed by the government is 32Kg, not 23Kg.
Ba are just trying to screw over yet again, the hard working people who pay the luggage stealers, sorry, "handlers" wages.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the maximum weight limit for one person to handle, Europe-wide, is 25 kg if you're handling freight The HSE is still procrastinating over correcting the anomaly, which is resulting in many permanent injuries among those who lift bags.
It's not as simple as "if you can't do the job, get out" - by the time someone realises they can't do the job, they may be permanently injured. As I've said before on this forum, there's a world of difference between lifting your bags in and out of your car twice a year, and manhandling them on your knees in a cramped aircraft hold all day, every day!
In any case, the 2 pieces at 32kg system just encourages people to take loads of stuff they don't really need, contributing greatly to greenhouse gas emissions. People really should be encouraged to take less!
Oh, by the way, I have never handled bags. The majority who do, would not dream of stealing from you - as always, one or two bad apples tarnished their reputation. However, this SLF forum has a nasty habit of insulting airline staff and, as long as this continues, will not serve any positive purpose!
I knew there was a reason why I stopped posting.............
It's not as simple as "if you can't do the job, get out" - by the time someone realises they can't do the job, they may be permanently injured. As I've said before on this forum, there's a world of difference between lifting your bags in and out of your car twice a year, and manhandling them on your knees in a cramped aircraft hold all day, every day!
In any case, the 2 pieces at 32kg system just encourages people to take loads of stuff they don't really need, contributing greatly to greenhouse gas emissions. People really should be encouraged to take less!
Oh, by the way, I have never handled bags. The majority who do, would not dream of stealing from you - as always, one or two bad apples tarnished their reputation. However, this SLF forum has a nasty habit of insulting airline staff and, as long as this continues, will not serve any positive purpose!
I knew there was a reason why I stopped posting.............
Guest
Posts: n/a
However, this SLF forum has a nasty habit of insulting airline staff
Equally, in my experience, some airline people (not you Bealine) have a habit of insulting their pax.
I must say that I am confused by BA presently, as to whether it is a full service airline or not.
As a result, I do not take many BA flights these days.
Equally, in my experience, some airline people (not you Bealine) have a habit of insulting their pax.
I must say that I am confused by BA presently, as to whether it is a full service airline or not.
As a result, I do not take many BA flights these days.
Slightly off topic, the BA baggage tracing is a farce and a misnomer. All they do is wait for a bag to appear - they have no way of knowing where it is. Mrs radeng had to wait a week for her bag last time she came back from the US. Very different to the general run of American airlines - who normally, are pretty poor on customer service. Plus, some of the employees in baggage tracing are there to deprive a village of its resident idiots - an example being the one who, told that mrs radeng wished to speak to her supervisor, said ' I haven't got a supervisor'. Then told 'Let me speak to your manager' responded with 'I haven't got a manager'. Five different people promised to telephone back and didn't.....so it went on.
As a tracing service, 'hopeless' and 'incompetent' are compliments! Pity they let down the check in staff and cabin crew, who I've always found excellent at BA.
As a tracing service, 'hopeless' and 'incompetent' are compliments! Pity they let down the check in staff and cabin crew, who I've always found excellent at BA.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Warwickshire
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
H& S and IATA still say 32KG
http://www.hse.gov.uk/airtransport/live.htm
and even discussed (at length) by Parliament
http://www.publications.parliament.u...70418-0021.htm
http://www.hse.gov.uk/airtransport/live.htm
and even discussed (at length) by Parliament
http://www.publications.parliament.u...70418-0021.htm
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alot of the confusion comes in the difference between baggage allowance and a maximum bag weight; groups travelling together can pool their allowances and so we get heavy bags. Typically, Mum, Dad & 2 kids; each have 20 kgs bag allowance totalling 80 kgs but turn up at the airport with 2 bags weighing 32kgs and one of 16kgs. Before 2003 when the 32kg limit was introduced in the Uk (AUS/NZ were the first in 2002), they would have arrived with 2 bags of 40kgs each.
Another mis-understanding is that there is some legal limit to the weight of a bag. there is not; neither in the UK nor from the EU. Yes, there are recommended limits and IATA is in the process of reducing their recommended limit from 32kgs to 23kgs. I believe it will be published in their 2008 AHM.
Rainbow - you are WAY off line; I have not been a baggage handler for more that a few days over my career but I have seen the injuries sustained by honest, hard working guys and gals on ramps across the world. If you think it is a matter of 'can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen' you knowledge in this area is sadly lacking. The building industry, the breweries, supermarkets etc. all massively reduced their individual item weights years ago; sadly avaition has lagged behind with the (pathetic)excuse that it is a global business and you can't impose limits everywhere.
The reason there is no legal limit is each aircraft type is different, each baggage make-up area is different; the environment in terms of heat, humidity, cold etc. influences the ability of an individual as well as the frequency of moving the load.
From a pure safety perspective EVERYONE involved in aviation; crews, handlers, managers, travel agents et al should preach the gospel about lowering individual bag weights. 15-20kgs should be the target weight per bag, no more. If the idustry took as much care over it's employees as it does over the maintenance of the aircraft we could solve this overnight.
Why do peoplle need to take such huge bags?
Maybe if they banned the wheels on the bags and people had to lift AND carry there bags the passenger would begin to understand.
And remember, it is not just people in the aviation industry, this affects the coach & taxi drivers, hotel portes and everyone in the chain of lifting and moving these individual bags.
Sermon over...
GH
Another mis-understanding is that there is some legal limit to the weight of a bag. there is not; neither in the UK nor from the EU. Yes, there are recommended limits and IATA is in the process of reducing their recommended limit from 32kgs to 23kgs. I believe it will be published in their 2008 AHM.
Rainbow - you are WAY off line; I have not been a baggage handler for more that a few days over my career but I have seen the injuries sustained by honest, hard working guys and gals on ramps across the world. If you think it is a matter of 'can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen' you knowledge in this area is sadly lacking. The building industry, the breweries, supermarkets etc. all massively reduced their individual item weights years ago; sadly avaition has lagged behind with the (pathetic)excuse that it is a global business and you can't impose limits everywhere.
The reason there is no legal limit is each aircraft type is different, each baggage make-up area is different; the environment in terms of heat, humidity, cold etc. influences the ability of an individual as well as the frequency of moving the load.
From a pure safety perspective EVERYONE involved in aviation; crews, handlers, managers, travel agents et al should preach the gospel about lowering individual bag weights. 15-20kgs should be the target weight per bag, no more. If the idustry took as much care over it's employees as it does over the maintenance of the aircraft we could solve this overnight.
Why do peoplle need to take such huge bags?
Maybe if they banned the wheels on the bags and people had to lift AND carry there bags the passenger would begin to understand.
And remember, it is not just people in the aviation industry, this affects the coach & taxi drivers, hotel portes and everyone in the chain of lifting and moving these individual bags.
Sermon over...
GH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Maybe if they banned the wheels on the bags and people had to lift AND carry there bags the passenger would begin to understand.
No they would use trolleys.
Maybe its time the aviation sector thought a bit more about the solution than the problem?
No they would use trolleys.
Maybe its time the aviation sector thought a bit more about the solution than the problem?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Maybe its time the aviation sector thought a bit more about the solution than the problem?"
It's true that additional minds and new thoughts should always be welcome.
The topic of how to reduce musculoskeletal injuries within aviation has challenged the industry, medical experts, the regulators and the unions for many years. progress has been made but there is still a long way to go to substantially reduce the problem.
In essence, the problem starts with the design of the aircraft.
Secondly, we have the ecomonics of the industry, cost over total safety.
Thirdly, it is a global industry and sadly, there are still parts of the globe where it is acceptable to maim and injure individuals because labour is cheap and there is no legal recourse for the injured.
Technical developments have been made:
Sliding carpets - most airlines remove them because of the weight penalty as weight = money.
Another potential solution is advanced loading equipment such as Rampsnake; it only cost x5 the current alternative so very few handling companies can afford them.
Automated bag halls - yes the technology is there and several systems have been tested. The airlines and the ground handlers do not, generally, own the airport infrastructure so getting capital investement to completely redesign and re-build baghalls is not top priority for the airport owners. After all, it's not there employees who are being injured.
The simplest way to resolve the problem is to reduce the load that has to be moved i.e. the bag. Not rocket science. Education along with regualtion CAn make a difference. The 'naysayers' all said that 32kgs was unenforceable in the UK - wrong; just as 23kgs WILL be enforced in the UK - it just does not solve the global issue.
So my friend, your thoughts and solutions would be very welcome.
It's true that additional minds and new thoughts should always be welcome.
The topic of how to reduce musculoskeletal injuries within aviation has challenged the industry, medical experts, the regulators and the unions for many years. progress has been made but there is still a long way to go to substantially reduce the problem.
In essence, the problem starts with the design of the aircraft.
Secondly, we have the ecomonics of the industry, cost over total safety.
Thirdly, it is a global industry and sadly, there are still parts of the globe where it is acceptable to maim and injure individuals because labour is cheap and there is no legal recourse for the injured.
Technical developments have been made:
Sliding carpets - most airlines remove them because of the weight penalty as weight = money.
Another potential solution is advanced loading equipment such as Rampsnake; it only cost x5 the current alternative so very few handling companies can afford them.
Automated bag halls - yes the technology is there and several systems have been tested. The airlines and the ground handlers do not, generally, own the airport infrastructure so getting capital investement to completely redesign and re-build baghalls is not top priority for the airport owners. After all, it's not there employees who are being injured.
The simplest way to resolve the problem is to reduce the load that has to be moved i.e. the bag. Not rocket science. Education along with regualtion CAn make a difference. The 'naysayers' all said that 32kgs was unenforceable in the UK - wrong; just as 23kgs WILL be enforced in the UK - it just does not solve the global issue.
So my friend, your thoughts and solutions would be very welcome.
Guest
Posts: n/a
So my friend, your thoughts and solutions would be very welcome.
My fees are 2,000€ per day plus expenses, as a consultant.
Otherwise I would prefer to revert to the usual situation where the suppliers think about how to deliver better service levels to the paying customer.
My fees are 2,000€ per day plus expenses, as a consultant.
Otherwise I would prefer to revert to the usual situation where the suppliers think about how to deliver better service levels to the paying customer.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah, the old supplier/customer sidestep.
Me thinks you have little to offer other than words.
As for me, no longer in the game so the field of play is not really an issue anymore.
I just know (Aviation ground handling - statistically THE worst industry in the UK for MSD injuries) that whilst the regulators, airlines, employers, infrastructure providers, aircraft equipment manufacturers, passenger groups et al study their navels, somewhere on an airport today, some poor individual has been injured - possibly permanently.
But hey, carry on packing those bags....
Me thinks you have little to offer other than words.
As for me, no longer in the game so the field of play is not really an issue anymore.
I just know (Aviation ground handling - statistically THE worst industry in the UK for MSD injuries) that whilst the regulators, airlines, employers, infrastructure providers, aircraft equipment manufacturers, passenger groups et al study their navels, somewhere on an airport today, some poor individual has been injured - possibly permanently.
But hey, carry on packing those bags....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Me thinks you have little to offer other than words
As I am a management consultant, that statement is truer than you probably realize.
But a lot of large companies feel that those words offer a lot of value.
So I say once again, the air travel industry needs to get its act together find a solution.
By the way, if the job is so dangerous, maybe all the handlers should exercise their choice of career and leave.
Once the companies had no one to shift the bags, they would soon change their approach.
As I am a management consultant, that statement is truer than you probably realize.
But a lot of large companies feel that those words offer a lot of value.
So I say once again, the air travel industry needs to get its act together find a solution.
By the way, if the job is so dangerous, maybe all the handlers should exercise their choice of career and leave.
Once the companies had no one to shift the bags, they would soon change their approach.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
........strangely enough when I pay €900 for a short haul ticket, I do expect the supplier to earn it and that includes thinking about how to improve my experience.
I quite agree with an earlier posting - instead of the 2 pieces at 32kg allowance, why not replace it wih 3 pieces at 23kg each instead? I think I know the answer already - CASH!!!
So, if we're going to make this reduction, why not trade off the reduced baggage weights with an investment in "kerbside" or "drive in" bag drop facilities to make the customers' experience altogether better. A Win-Win-Win situation all round I would have thought! But, hey, I don't have any influence over what Big Airways does - perhaps, FTG, the suggestion would look good coming from you?
That having been said, all airlines do need to actively start encouraging people to take only the items they need for their trip. It was quite an eye-opener when I used to threaten passengers from Africa or South America with excess charges just how many heavy, low value items such as tins of baked beans came out of their suitcases to be jettisoned. These cheap, heavy items unnecessarily being shipped every day contribute greatly to excess fossil fuel burning and fuel emissions.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LGW - Hub of the Universe!
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Apologies to Americans!
I unreservedly apologise, by the way, for my earlier post insulting Americans as "thick". The insult was not intended seriously - just a bit of light-hearted fun! Anyone who knows me would realise I quite like the USA and have a lot of time in particular for the people (and miniature donkeys at the Short Assets Ranch, Dallas) of Texas.
With the news of so many people losing their homes in California right now (and San Diego rates as one of my favourite places on this planet) I realise my attempt at humour was ill-timed - SORRY!!!
Right Ho! - Back on Topic...............
With the news of so many people losing their homes in California right now (and San Diego rates as one of my favourite places on this planet) I realise my attempt at humour was ill-timed - SORRY!!!
Right Ho! - Back on Topic...............