Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

If you were in Oxford UK, where would you fly from?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

If you were in Oxford UK, where would you fly from?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2007, 12:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you were in Oxford UK, where would you fly from?

Possibility of being in Oxford are for a while. Will always need quick getaway whenever possible. Question is where would be the best airfield of departure? Guess LHR nearest but ofcourse not always the cheapest. Is Luton an option despite current traffic and road works or is BHX worth a consideration. And what about Gatwick? 2 hours away with reasonable traffic and weather conditions?

All is very important!


Nivsy
nivsy is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 13:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It all depends where you want to go, and whether you need a lot of flexibility in timing of flights. LHR is best (probably the best in the world) for direct flights to as many international destinations as possible and for popular European destinations there are flights pretty much every hour - miss one, catch the next (assuming a valid ticket)!

The downside of LHR is well documented on this forum (M25 traffic and third-world terminals). Even though I live about halfway between Oxford and LHR, I've often used BHX in the past. If you're travelling to a destination served from there and you don't need the flexibility that LHR offers, then it's certainly worth a try.

With the roadworks on the M1 (though I haven't personally experienced them) you might find Stansted easier to get to than Luton or LGW
Pax Vobiscum is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 13:06
  #3 (permalink)  

Eight Gun Fighter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LHR

Get to Gloucester Bus Station and get the Oxford (Airline) Bus.

Went to Gatwick once from there and it took three hours and waited for bus three hours on return.

Oxford Bus to LHR about 80 mins.
Rollingthunder is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 13:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 859
Received 47 Likes on 22 Posts
Southampton is only an hour down the road. There's quite a few options from there.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 1st May 2007, 14:18
  #5 (permalink)  
Paid...Persona Grata
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Between BHX and EMA
Age: 78
Posts: 240
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
BHX should be less than an hour and has pretty good connections - e.g. daily to New York. If you want to fly loco there is also CVT, about the same distance. I use both quite a bit, no problems.

UFO
UniFoxOs is online now  
Old 1st May 2007, 20:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The downside of LHR is well documented on this forum (M25 traffic and third-world terminals).
Surely Oxford to LHR wouldn't involve the M25 at all ? Get off the M40 at Denham roundabout and drive the back roads through West Drayton.
Can't help with the terminals though
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 07:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pax Vobiscum
LHR is best (probably the best in the world) for direct flights to as many international destinations as possible...
If you look at movements, and discount the US as most will be domestic, (http://www.aci.aero/cda/aci/display/...=1-5-54-57_9_2__ ) both CDG and FRA are busier than LHR. My assumption from that would be that they serve more international destinations.
slim_slag is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 10:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FRA has the most non stop international destinations in the world. Heathrow has more passengers (no surprise to any of us who use it).
manintheback is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 14:11
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies on this. Its easy to forget just how busy some of the UK roads are and that with ever increasing check-in or security clearance issues its nice to consider some of the airfields offered up as alternatives - route availability providing.


Nivsy
nivsy is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 15:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What the mrs and I have found is that we will now only go to places served by our local regional airport. Got an FR and EZ base not much more than 30 minutes from front door to departure lounge and they go to some great spots. If we cannot fly from there, we don't bother going, and those two carriers go to more places than we could see in several years. Punctuality and service is far better than those overcrowded dumps in London. We only ever go to London when travelling long haul and it makes sense to fly direct, even then I am happy to fly out of BHX or MAN and change somewhere on route. You can also fly charter long haul out of regionals and as far as I am concerned they are now better than the scheduled carriers. It has to be a pretty good deal to lure me to London now, or else we are burning miles on BA.
slim_slag is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 17:12
  #11 (permalink)  

Aisle seat, please.
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: here and there (mostly there)
Age: 65
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a hard call. I live in Southampton and for most international flights I leave from there and change at CDG. This avoids the drive to Heathrow and Heathrow itself, but does mean changing in Paris. On balance it's worth it. From Oxford it might be an interesting option too, but with the car journey the options are more evenly balanced.
Gouabafla is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 20:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get to Gloucester Bus Station and get the Oxford (Airline) Bus.
Good idea, though (for the avoidance of doubt) it's Gloucester Road Bus Station. You can also catch the bus at the Thornhill Park & Ride on the A40 (but I think parking there is limited to 3 days max).

Southampton is only an hour down the road.
Have you been up the A34 recently Saintsman? At 3am it may be only an hour, but at busier times it can easily take 90 minutes to get to Winchester!

Surely Oxford to LHR wouldn't involve the M25 at all?
Well, when the M25 is bollixed, I get off the M40 at J2 (A355) and take the rat run through Stoke Poges onto the A4. It isn't usually any quicker than the M25 ('cos everyone else is trying the same dodge), but at least it feels as though you're moving!

FRA has the most non stop international destinations in the world.
I'm not doubting your word, manintheback, but can you point to a reference for this statement? Of course, the French would count flights to Papeete and Martinique as domestic
Pax Vobiscum is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 21:10
  #13 (permalink)  

Eight Gun Fighter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"it's Gloucester Road Bus Station"

Yes I made a mistake.

It's actually Gloucester Green bus station.
Rollingthunder is offline  
Old 3rd May 2007, 03:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
The 'Airbus' from Gloucester Green takes 80 mins to get to LHR central station or 100 mins to get to terminal 4. It goes every 30 minutes at most times of the day (I seem to remember) and it's a very good service. The driver is in contact with the preceeding bus and takes a different route if things are looking busy, so is rarely delayed. I cost about 17 Quid return when I last used it, probably gone up a bit now. I used to use it in preference to driving in sometimes when I used to work from LHR.

Getting to anywhere else from Oxford is a pain and usually involves rail.

www.oxfordbus.co.uk/heathrow.html for a timetable.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 3rd May 2007, 08:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another problem with transit via London is having to add buffer space for when things go wrong. So from round here you can almost always say it's 1hr46 to London on the train, but sometimes it's 2hr10, rarely 3hr30. Usually it might be 4hr on the bus, but sometimes 5hr. If you catch the train, you have to travel across London, which usually takes 55 mins, but sometimes 1hr20.

So if using the train or other transport, in order to get your flight, you need to take an earlier train, and usually you spend an hour or two waiting needlessly at the airport. Coming back, you need to allow for a couple of hour delays which usually doesn't happen, but happens enough to make you book a later train than you might need. So you wait on the station concourse for two hours. Or buy a full fare ticket of course, but that is spendy.

You can easily wait an hour or so for your luggage at LHR, totally unpredictable, but you need to factor it all in.

Local airport this doesn't happen, certainly not enough to worry about, in my experience.
slim_slag is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 11:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Benelux
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
Unfortunately nivsy you don't give an indication of which destinations you would be looking at. However, if it was me, my first priority would be to avoid LHR and LGW whenever possible. I would go for BHX without hesitation. For long haul you can always fly via AMS or DXB (eastbound) and EWR (westbound). I use BHX quite a lot and I like the relative ease of using this airport in contrast to LHR or LGW. Travel from Oxford to BHX should be relatively painless with the exception of the morning rush hours on the M42.
BRUpax is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 11:49
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many thanks. Dont really know all destinations likely to be travelling to - but i suspect some will be with the LOCOS and others long haul. BHX does seem like a good alternative. For back trips to GIB only really have choice of LGW or LUT ofcourse 9well so far and no doubt for immediate future) - but LGW kinda wins that one as LUT is horrible and Monarch a bit of a tight squeeze once on board.


Nivsy
nivsy is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 12:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: He's on the limb to nowhere
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need to think out of the box.

I have to go to a small town in Austria next month. How do I get there?

1) Five hour hack down to a departure lounge in London, flight to Vienna airport, bus to central Vienna, 2 hour train to destination.

2) Simple thirty minutes drive to local airport departure lounge, flight to Bratislava airport in Slovakia, 90 minute bus to central Vienna, 2 hour train from vienna to destination.

Which makes more sense? Going via a third country makes far more sense, though others will laugh at that. Even if I rent a car, total time from door to door is faster via a third country. My flight to bratislava cost me peanuts.

Jerez is close to Gibraltar. Might not work for you, but might work for people living near stansted.
slim_slag is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 19:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Retired to Bisley from the small African nation
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let the train take the strain

I live just down the road from Oxford.

Train to Birmingham International, every time the route is served from there.

Sven
Sven Sixtoo is offline  
Old 6th May 2007, 10:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
We used to have an office in Burnham, Bucks, with Heathrow departures passing over our head.

I took to time from leaving the office to wheels-up on the runway. Over a couple of flights each it was actually quicker to go through Birmingham than Heathrow. Passing Oxford on the way, of course.

Luton is becoming increasingly difficult to access, the morning traffic both northbound and southbound on the M1 approaching there makes for great unreliability and you need to be adding one or maybe two hours padding. In contrast Stansted road approaches are straightforward. I wonder how much Easy notice it ?
WHBM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.