Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Heathrow voted worlds worst airport

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Heathrow voted worlds worst airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2006, 11:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow voted worlds worst airport

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6087016.stm

Ryanair may have taken the honours for the airline but whilst Heathrow is pretty awful by some standards, I can only assume the voters havent visited such illustrious places as Delhi, Nairobi , La Guardia etc
manintheback is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 12:20
  #2 (permalink)  
I'm Just A Lawnmower
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Over the hills and faraway
Age: 62
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but at the bottom it states that Ayr is the new 'must visit' holiday destination.

I think, therefore, we can take the survey as being a bit dodgy...
BALIX is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 17:24
  #3 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Heathrow has got to rate as being a carbuncle on the posterior of humanity.

The surly and arrogant attitude of many of the security personnel in the London BAA airports is a striking feature and the general appearance is scruffy.

All in all, best avoided if at all possible.

I have to come to the UK next week and will be using LCY in and outbound to avoid the BAA airports.
 
Old 26th Oct 2006, 20:52
  #4 (permalink)  
SXB
Riding the Euro Gravy Plane
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Strasbourg
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While Heathrow is pretty bad, and I agree it's best avoided, it certainly isn't the worst airport in the world; I can only conclude that the contributors to that particular survey are not that well travelled.

RYR,also, isn't the worst airline. I don't like them but I've been on far worse. Airlines that spring to mind (restricting to Europe) include Air Zina (Georgian Airlines), JAT, Ukraine International, Montenegro Airlines and Armravia. To name just a few....My comments on airlines refer just to the quality of their customer services and the on board experience.
SXB is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 21:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SXB
While Heathrow is pretty bad, and I agree it's best avoided, it certainly isn't the worst airport in the world; I can only conclude that the contributors to that particular survey are not that well travelled.
That may be true, but these surveys typically provide a list of airports and airlines for the respondents to rank. No write-ins. So LHR was rated worst airport of those in the list, ditto RYR.

A nuance obviously wasted on the Beeb.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2006, 21:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair is pretty bad but, unluss you're stupid enough to pay circa EUR150 far a late booking, you get what you pay for. Of regular airlines BA are p1ss poor, Lufthansa little better, KLM getting there and Air France, well let us not even go there

Of airports, regional airports are wonderful things, easy parking and little congestion but the worst airport I have ever had the displeasure of is Zaporozhye in Ukraine, the domestic terminal is a corrugated tin shack, with a 'cattle trodden' concrete floor, the air conditioning is the gaps in the iron and when it's minus 20 outside it's minus 20 inside also. I'll never complain about Heathrow again but I will do my utmost to avoid it

And guess who has a base ar Ayr International Airport a.k.a. Prestwick, yep you've got it, let us slang of Ryanair in one instance but, hey, Ayr/Prestwick is the place to travel to.
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 06:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In the dark
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not often I'd stick up for Ryanair, but having flown with them more times than I'd like to admit, delayed flights are not normally something they're guilty of. I've only had 2 substantial delays with them, both caused by bad weather.
Flying_Frisbee is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 11:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Age: 64
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know how you can compare the awards to LHR and FR. One is a shambles of an outfit that profits obscenely from "facilitating" the travel of millions of SLF a year, under appalling conditions, while cutting costs to a bare minimum and paying their staff peanuts, while the other is a low cost airline.

I have said it before, there is no excuse for the shambles that is LHR. It is a national disgrace.
Bangkokeasy is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 11:48
  #9 (permalink)  

Aisle seat, please.
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: here and there (mostly there)
Age: 65
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair may have taken the honours for the airline but whilst Heathrow is pretty awful by some standards, I can only assume the voters havent visited such illustrious places as Delhi, Nairobi , La Guardia etc
Frighteningly, I reckon that Nairobi is one of the best airports in Sub-Saharan Africa!

There is an article in today's Torygraph which gives a pretty good picture of travel in Africa. LHR is pretty awful, but there are FAR worse airports out there.
Gouabafla is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 13:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: East Midlands (not Nottingham!)
Age: 70
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate LHR with a vengeance and will do almost anything to avoid flying from there.
I also have no love for Washington The Virgin Lounge there is abysmal
However, my day lightened somewhat when I saw that the portable loos for the cast amounts of construction work taking place there, were called 'Don's Johns' !
But I recently went to Vancouver and had a happy suprise. Apart from the immigration queue which was hosting the SLFs from the Shanghai flight before mine, and seemingly the one before that, it was a wondrous place. Wide open and airy. Such a nice change.
Smiliesam is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 16:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smiliesam
But I recently went to Vancouver and had a happy suprise. Apart from the immigration queue which was hosting the SLFs from the Shanghai flight before mine, and seemingly the one before that, it was a wondrous place. Wide open and airy. Such a nice change.
You're welcome; my many contributions to the AIF helped to make it open and airy . Seriously, it is one of the best terminals around.

The schedules have been cunningly contrived to ensure that all the Asian and European widebodies arrive at more or less the same time necessitating a huge immigration hall which is otherwise practically empty 20 hours a day.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 05:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree that anyone who thinks LHR is the worst airport in the world hasn't seen too many in Africa, Russia, India etc... What LHR is though is a 1960's airport, which has been built around passenger numbers unimaginable at that time, has been modified and expanded in everywhich direction. It has been squeezed by the people who are unfortunate enough to live next to the airport and it can't be relocated because of the power that Joe Public has over new developments... It's no different than many American Airports; JFK, LAX, ORD build at that time and suffering the same fates. If you look at the airports which would be rated amongst the best in the world - they're typically less than 25 years old and/or have started in green-field sites.... but I guess LHR was a green field site - in 1946.

Just wish people would stop kicking the old girl...
spiney is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 08:36
  #13 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Spiney

Having done a comparative study of LHR and LAX for a major airline, I would like to say that they are not comparable in terms of real estate.

LAX is much larger.

And I will keep kicking Heathrow, its a rubbish airport that fails to deliver a good customer experience and it needs to change.

At the moment, it is a great example of the famous British art of compromise, that does not deliver a complete solution, only partial satisfaction. And that is not good enough.

Austin 7s were good in the 1950s too.
 
Old 28th Oct 2006, 10:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SXB
While Heathrow is pretty bad, and I agree it's best avoided, it certainly isn't the worst airport in the world; I can only conclude that the contributors to that particular survey are not that well travelled.
I agree SXB, like in all surveys you can only get an idea of what that specific portion of travellers think. I Never even heard of TripAdvisor, if I had I would have probably casted my vote. So surveys like that only give us an idea of what a certain category of flyers like or not.

I really hate LHR, T4 isn't that bad but oh my, T1,2&3 get my vote for worst airport I've ever been to. I had far better experiences in Africa (although never been to Lagos) remote American towns and even the annoying, displeasing SHOREHAM (brighton city) AIRPORT (aka the Shoreham strip) has given me less hassle.

I hated the queues in some middle eastern airports (Damascus anyone?) but people are usually much nicer and have better attitudes than most BAA security agents at LHR (F3G I so empathise with you).
I will never forget some police officers' smiles at the visa issuing office in Amman - have you ever seen an immigration officer smile at you at LHR?

By the way, it hurts me to say it but LGW is going down that road too unfortunately, although there's still a sense of humanity there - it really me off when they clearly see I am pregnant and they hand-search me anyway: if they had told me in advance I would have avoided going through the metal detector in the first place!!! This thank god hasn't happened at LGW just yet.

While I agree with LHR being the worst, some Italian airports should have been included in the top worst airports ever, I would have put NAP at number two and FCO at number three. Believe an Italian!!!!

FBW
flybywire is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 10:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bangkokeasy
I don't know how you can compare the awards to LHR and FR. One is a shambles of an outfit that profits obscenely from "facilitating" the travel of millions of SLF a year, under appalling conditions, while cutting costs to a bare minimum and paying their staff peanuts, while the other is a low cost airline.
Hahahahahahaha!!! You've made my (otherwise dull) day!!
flybywire is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 12:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As much as I hate LHR I think I dislike Dublin Most of all....but then it is the homebase of Ryanair so there you have it!
apaddyinuk is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 15:51
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 637
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by flybywire
.... and even the annoying, displeasing SHOREHAM (brighton city) AIRPORT (aka the Shoreham strip) has given me less hassle.


FBW
Just curious, FBW about what you didn't like about Shoreham. Always found it a reasonably pleasant experience as pax (free car parking helps!), apart from one rather stroppy check in woman....maybe it's a different story if you're a pilot.

B&t
Blues&twos is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 16:02
  #18 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can't speak for FBW, but I always found Shoreham a lovely place to visit in a light aircraft.

I have especially fond memories, as I did a leg of my qualifying cross country to/from there in 1994.

03/21 was a narrow runway and you always felt high on approach, due to the optical illlusions it caused.

Nice art deco feel to the whole place.
 
Old 28th Oct 2006, 18:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry my experience is the opposite...it used to be good but now that they think they're as big and important as Gatwick it isn't as good anymore.
Try to buy fuel from them.......I won't even go there.

Anyway, we have a dispute still going on with them, god knows when that will be resolved.

That's it, personal experience, nothing more! I now know that Lydd is a much more pleasant alternative, people are so pleasant, and the landing fees are a third of EGKA. Sorry for the diversion from the original thread!!
flybywire is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2006, 20:13
  #20 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FBW

Sorry to hear of your bad experience.

It is a few years since I last visited in my Pup, things must have gone downhill

Lydd was always good to visit, nice lunch there.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.