Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Passenger size a safety issue?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Passenger size a safety issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th January 2004 | 18:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Sussex
Passenger size a safety issue?

Travelling home on a long-haul charter flight recently I was astonished by the size of one passenger who was so grossly obese he was completely wedged into his seat, his stomach almost touching the seat in front. He had to use an extension seatbelt and as he was in the aisle seat, it occurred to me that the people trapped inside him would not have a hope in getting out if there was an emergency evacuation. Also if he had managed to extract himself he would have completely blocked the aisle.

I believe that this is a serious safety issue and I wonder why the airlines do not limit the size of passenger, or alternatively insist that they purchase a seat in Business class. Looking around the departure lounge I saw several people of this huge stature and the problem will only get worse. Will the airlines start to configure the aircraft for these bigger people? It must be so uncomfortable for them as well as the passenger next to them. One is reminded of the story about the small lady who was squeezed in beside a 24 stone woman and suffered crush injuries.

Any views?
lady in red is offline  
Old 28th January 2004 | 22:08
  #2 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
If I recall correctly, this has already been to the courts in the US. The answer was (I think) that the airline needs to provide seats of the right size.

When I sit down, I look for my exits and the best way to get to them (such as the counting rows method). On many occasions, I have concluded that my best route will be over the top of the seats. So-called 'Seat Surfing', due to obese people, or numbers of children.

I doubt that an accident investigation report will state, "Persons A and B were too fat to get out of their seats fast enough and so passengers Y and Z died also."

It would be impossible to prove, other than through witness statements of surviviors. So we might expect such information to emerge anecdotally in the news, rather than in reports. Either way, I expect that it won't be long.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 28th January 2004 | 22:30
  #3 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Going to be dangerous for them if I get stuck beside a fat b****d with elbows sticking out all over my seat-space when I'm trying to eat - just once more

Recently had one of these beside me all the way from BAH to LHR, then some idiot with an enormous oversized leather jacket flapping all over me from LGW to PHL

The there's the fool who reclines his seat (always in front of me) as soon as the flight's in the air, and leaves it that way until he's asked to put it up for landing.

So I end up with elbows all over me from the side, and my tray-table jammed in front of me when I'm trying to eat my meal (as if it wasn't hard enough to stomach "stewed something and rice" anyway

(RANT RAVE MOAN)
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 28th January 2004 | 22:40
  #4 (permalink)  

Shining Example, apparently...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Lone Star State
This has come up on here in the past, IIRC.

SouthWest seem to have the right policy: Large pax are asked to purchase another seat at checkin, if they didn't already. Should there be empty seats on the flight, the price of the second ticket's refunded. Seems fair to all.

On a couple of recent flights, FAs have asked that people don't recline until everyone's finished guzzling - good idea.
Crepello is offline  
Old 28th January 2004 | 23:11
  #5 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: London,Bucharest...wherever...
I have regularly seen on US and West African flights obese people, mainly women, who are literally so wide they have to go sideways down the aisle...they are not going to get out in an emergency and neither are the poor sods behind them...I doubt frankly they would even fit thru an overwing exit.

These people are a hazard to thenselves and to others. They should be seated on a bulkhead row close to an exit and an f/a...they should be treated as disabled and numbers limited...yet on some flights there are loads of them...

As for the experience of sitting next to one...as others have found it is unpleasant to say the least
Boss Raptor is offline  
Old 29th January 2004 | 01:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Asia
On a recent flight from Singapore they were inviting passengers to be weighed as part of a survey on passenger weight that was being conducted.

Maybe/hopefully to address this issue???
askew is offline  
Old 29th January 2004 | 02:01
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 349
From: London UK
I have had one of these (approx 22 stone) pax come along next to me who just lifted the armrest so he could half spill over into my seat. No please, no excuse me, just did it.

When I said "Excuse me, I will keep MY armrest down, thank you", he waddled off to the cabin crew and was found somewhere else, presumably next to someone more timid.

From our CPL friends, what are the actual regs about armrests down for takeoff/landing, as patrolled for by the crew. Is it an official requirement ? An airline procedure ?


BTW I did hear of a gross pax who was made to book 2 seats and was then allocated 10C and 10D, on opposite sides of the aisle !
WHBM is online now  
Old 29th January 2004 | 02:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, USA
Interesting perspectives...

Passenger survey regarding obese passengers.

Then there's this regarding Southwest making obese passengers pay for two seats.

SLF
Self Loathing Freight is offline  
Old 29th January 2004 | 02:20
  #9 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 13
From: UK
WN's explanation of its policy can be found here - http://www.southwest.com/about_swa/p...onal_seat.html

Whether or not you agree with their reasons/philosophy, it seems to be a model of how to communicate them clearly to customers.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 29th January 2004 | 18:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
it occurred to me that the people trapped inside him would not have a hope in getting out if there was an emergency evacuation
I suppose a fat fella eating other passengers eclipses all other worries.
davethelimey is offline  
Old 29th January 2004 | 21:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Right there under the stair
The armrest down issue is i believe to reduce sideways movement if things get a little tricky in an emergency.

I think Southwest's is a good idea and also it's a good idea to let them have the money back if there are eventually free seats on the flight.
Diverse is offline  
Old 30th January 2004 | 01:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,809
Likes: 0
From: Bothell WA
The armrest down issue is i believe to reduce sideways movement if things get a little tricky in an emergency.
At my airline the only arm rest that are required to be down are the aisle rests for takeoff and landing. They are labeled on the rest. I work for an airline that requires passengers to buy two seats if they can not fit in one.

In the overwing exit rows. If you need a seat belt extension you can not sit there.
If I recall correctly, this has already been to the courts in the US. The answer was (I think) that the airline needs to provide seats of the right size.
No, the airline can make you pay for two seats if you can not fit in one seat.
TR4A is offline  
Old 8th February 2004 | 01:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Does that mean that if my wife and I are really skinny, and can comfortably fit into one seat then do we only have to pay for one seat ? Oh, we can share the meal and baggage allowance too.





Invictus
Invictus is offline  
Old 11th February 2004 | 03:43
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: In a Galaxy, far, far away.........
Might sound a bit silly, why don't the airlines have an 'excess guttage' charge??

If i was to check in a big case that was overweight i would be charged!!!! What happens if this overweight person checks in a normal bag but weighs 50Kg more than me do the airlines make allowances for this in the weight and balance measurements???
holbrob is offline  
Old 11th February 2004 | 06:27
  #15 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 90
Many moons ago flew trans-Pacific (my own money...) on CO next to a HUGE woman, who also had support bandages on both her knees. I literally had half a seat, and could not use one end of my seat belt. I was constantly harrassed by the CC to either buckle up (fine, show me how....), or to stop standing around (I could only sit sideways - turning the other cheek, so to speak). The CC could not look me in the eye when I left the plane.

Wrote to CO and the FAA afterwards - didn't even get a reply ( well, I am an alien). Have never used CO again, and never will....
reynoldsno1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.