So could it be that cameras were installed to use in a campaign against a competitor rather than to check if the runway is wet? Pretty average behaviour if so.
|
Originally Posted by Cloudee
(Post 11467169)
So could it be that cameras were installed to use in a campaign against a competitor rather than to check if the runway is wet? Pretty average behaviour if so.
|
Originally Posted by Dry_Twotter
(Post 11467141)
Hinterland GM and HOFO are brave boys thinking that their piece of paper gets them around the P135 and the C208 POH.
Probably something that you’d want to run by the punters in the back, wouldn’t you say? |
Yes, a Test Pilot does it and then those figures are adjusted for an average Pilot because of course they don't expect you to fly it like a Test Pilot. If you want to go landing on an Airstrip prior to the numbers on a section of ground that isn't part of the regular inspections required to approve that Airstrip, you go right ahead, but when you hit a hole that no one knew about don't be surprised when you're the one responsible.
|
Originally Posted by Ixixly
(Post 11467696)
Yes, a Test Pilot does it and then those figures are adjusted for an average Pilot because of course they don't expect you to fly it like a Test Pilot. If you want to go landing on an Airstrip prior to the numbers on a section of ground that isn't part of the regular inspections required to approve that Airstrip, you go right ahead, but when you hit a hole that no one knew about don't be surprised when you're the one responsible.
|
Originally Posted by Ixixly
(Post 11467696)
Yes, a Test Pilot does it and then those figures are adjusted for an average Pilot because of course they don't expect you to fly it like a Test Pilot. If you want to go landing on an Airstrip prior to the numbers on a section of ground that isn't part of the regular inspections required to approve that Airstrip, you go right ahead, but when you hit a hole that no one knew about don't be surprised when you're the one responsible.
No, what is suggested is that, on a really short strip, no bush pilot who wants to maximise the margins is going to waste valuable stopping distance by flying large air transport 50 ft heights at the threshold, then relying on maximum braking to compensate for being only average and maybe landing a bit longer than the test pilot did. 50 ft looks bloody high when you have only a few hundred metres to get down and stopped. If we were to scale things down according to aircraft size and responsiveness, 15ft would probably feel right for most pilots and provide adequate clearance 'over the fence', but no, in aviation we often use arbitrary numbers because it's easier for the rule makers. The rule makers are not out there doing it in the weeds. |
The ignorance shown in this thread astounding. It certainly puts the Hinterland HOFO in the unenviable position of having to support his ill-advised GM [CAVOK92 + burners] who’s gone rouge on a pilot rumour network.
Some advice: you are attempting to push your way into the Torres Strait; a high skill, high intensity environment with several very experienced operators who, despite the local challenges, manage to keep the good people of the TS safe on a daily basis. Rather than coming on here and telling us all we have no idea what we’re doing, perhaps a good place to start would be:
At the end of the day this “opposition” you speak of may well be the people you’ll be thanking later for spotting you in the ocean. |
Iv never had someone try and name me on a forum before. Is that even in the rules?
Be rest assured that I am not associated with the blue shed, infact the only people I know around Cairns work in the red shed. Never the less I am just someone that is out of GA who is taking pleasure in listening to the scuttlebutt that is being thrown between an organisation that appears to have a full understanding of the new regulation and one that didn’t bother to read them, and when they (he) did still can’t see where they went wrong. |
Originally Posted by Dry_Twotter
(Post 11468249)
The ignorance shown in this thread astounding. It certainly puts the Hinterland HOFO in the unenviable position of having to support his ill-advised GM [CAVOK92 + burners] who’s gone rouge on a pilot rumour network.
Some advice: you are attempting to push your way into the Torres Strait; a high skill, high intensity environment with several very experienced operators who, despite the local challenges, manage to keep the good people of the TS safe on a daily basis. Rather than coming on here and telling us all we have no idea what we’re doing, perhaps a good place to start would be:
At the end of the day this “opposition” you speak of may well be the people you’ll be thanking later for spotting you in the ocean. |
I don't see what all the fuss is about, you just roll to a stop. PS I don't think they crossed the threshold at 50ft, and that didn't look like touching down 300m into the runway. I also reckon that approach was a tad steeper than 3 degrees. |
Originally Posted by 43Inches
(Post 11468342)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ojt-zS5IaQ
I don't see what all the fuss is about, you just roll to a stop. PS I don't think they crossed the threshold at 50ft, and that didn't look like touching down 300m into the runway. I also reckon that approach was a tad steeper than 3 degrees. Oh and while I am on my soapbox, forget all about the Jacobsen flare and other theory like looking down the runway during the flare, particularly when you need to get it on early. Pick your touchdown spot and look at it. You go where you look. Of course look up during the rollout, but doing so too early always seems to prolong the touchdown. |
Originally Posted by Cloudee
(Post 11467169)
So could it be that cameras were installed to use in a campaign against a competitor rather than to check if the runway is wet? Pretty average behaviour if so.
Just asking. |
Originally Posted by CAVOK92
(Post 11466543)
Only heard good things about working for PC and Hinterland.
Can’t comment about working for Skytrans but if they had their head in the sand about the new Part135 requirement I’m sure it says a lot about how it is being managed currently. Maybe the CP should keep his dress ups and take on being a tradie instead 😂. |
Originally Posted by Left 270
(Post 11468474)
You’ve not been around the right people I’d have to suggest, sure he has his fan club, but he’s as scummy as any of the operators I came across in GA.
|
Originally Posted by the_rookie
(Post 11468512)
Getting your super paid is a privilege and not a right apparently
First, if not already a member, join the AFAP. Yes, they are a bit weak in some areas, but they have excellent free legal help available for members. Then put your employer on notice that they have 14 days to get your super up to date, or you will notify the ATO. If they don’t pay on time send them a final warning. If they cry poor or whatever, remind them that it’s your money and that you are not in the loans business. Tell them that you WILL be reporting them to the ATO. Then DO IT, advising them that you have done so - this gives them one last opportunity to pay up and have you call off the wolves. It is important to be seen at every stage to have been transparent and reasonable. Of course some bosses will still brand you as Bolshevik, but they are just germs you sometimes find in this business. Not only did this once work for me, I got the super plus interest, and ended up with a very compliant employer. Pilots need to p!ss or get off the pot. |
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
(Post 11468656)
If so, here is a guaranteed way to get it up to date and not get sacked. Or if you do get sacked, have some fun with a wrongful dismissal case at no cost to you. If they claim redundancy is the reason, you can prevent them from subsequent hiring until you are reinstated.
First, if not already a member, join the AFAP. Yes, they are a bit weak in some areas, but they have excellent free legal help available for members. Then put your employer on notice that they have 14 days to get your super up to date, or you will notify the ATO. If they don’t pay on time send them a final warning. If they cry poor or whatever, remind them that it’s your money and that you are not in the loans business. Tell them that you WILL be reporting them to the ATO. Then DO IT, advising them that you have done so - this gives them one last opportunity to pay up and have you call off the wolves. It is important to be seen at every stage to have been transparent and reasonable. Of course some bosses will still brand you as Bolshevik, but they are just germs you sometimes find in this business. Not only did this once work for me, I got the super plus interest, and ended up with a very compliant employer. Pilots need to p!ss or get off the pot. |
Originally Posted by 43Inches
(Post 11468669)
Мир, хлеб и земля, Comrade!
|
A GM who's "gone rouge"? Once they start wearing make-up, it's a dead giveaway they've lost the plot.
|
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
(Post 11468835)
A GM who's "gone rouge"? Once they start wearing make-up, it's a dead giveaway they've lost the plot.
|
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
(Post 11468371)
Very nice; touched down on the numbers just beyond the piano keys. Slightly steep (about 4.5 degrees) approach works much better on short fields than the flat drag-it-in technique sometimes seen. Pilots confusing precautionary landings taught in some flight schools with serious short field techniques perhaps?
Oh and while I am on my soapbox, forget all about the Jacobsen flare and other theory like looking down the runway during the flare, particularly when you need to get it on early. Pick your touchdown spot and look at it. You go where you look. Of course look up during the rollout, but doing so too early always seems to prolong the touchdown. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:12. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.