Originally Posted by lucille
(Post 10574661)
Just perused the RFDS website, I see an advert for B350 pilots with required min hours of 2000 plus 500 ME. Seems a tad on the low side unless all they’re doing these days is flying the magenta line. Deja Vu is correct about the history of GA pilots conditions. I look back on my career and shake my head at what I accepted just to get a few more hours on the next level up, Only did well after leaving to fly overseas. A move that I cannot recommend too highly to anyone wanting to lift themselves out of the poverty cycle. Sadly the overseas options we took have long since become "uneconomically viable" too. |
Originally Posted by Obidiah
(Post 10574912)
Exactly!!
They get paid more because they are worth more, the pilots role on board is probably the least complex and least demanding of all three roles along with the fact the only role which has sensible (??) duty time restrictions. |
I look back on my career and shake my head at what I accepted just to get a few more hours on the next level up, Only did well after leaving to fly overseas. A move that I cannot recommend too highly to anyone wanting to lift themselves out of the poverty cycle. Bad employers are crying because they don't have a queue of pilots willing to take whatever they offer and even the good ones are battling with retention as the path to the airlines has sped up. BTW My mate got a job with Flight West on the F28 and is now with Cathy. |
Originally Posted by Cloudee
(Post 10574412)
Why make a big deal about the pilot being the lowest paid on board? Doctors and nurses need a uni degree and substantial extra qualifications to work in the aero medical field. It’s not a competition between them and the pilots. By all means go for higher wages, but you won’t get the money by pointing to the medical staff and complaining. |
Originally Posted by machtuk
(Post 10573498)
i feel sorry for people like you, you truly are just plain angry with yr multiple "bag 'em" posts! How many years did you work for the RFDS to make you so bitter? |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10574965)
So correct me if I am wrong, but if a pilot had a degree from a uni, like a degree in aviation (LOL) from say RMIT Uni he/she should be paid the same as a doctor or a nurse or at least significantly more than the current rate.. And do tell us more about the "substantial extra qualifications to work in the aero medical field" What complete tosh.
|
Originally Posted by Cloudee
(Post 10574974)
A pilot doesn't need a degree, a nurse or a doctor does. Clearly you have no idea of the extra qualifications you need to work as a doctor or nurse for the RFDS but you can claim it to be tosh. You must be one of those skygods.
Doctors and nurses do a course of study and when it's completed successfully they get a document called a Degree, when a pilot successfully does a course of study he/she gets a licence, same thing really, a permit to exercise the privileges of whatever document you receive. So until you can clarify it all this particular skygod thinks you talk absolute tosh. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10574963)
Without a pilot no one is worth anything. Maybe instead they could jump in a road ambulance for the trip from Charleville to Brisbane, at least the ambulance driver would be getting well paid.
This kind of flying should be the best paid in industry. It’s not just flying it’s single pilot flying which means you do it all. Plus as a poster wrote even though one tries not to be involved there is that emotional attachment that is natural. It’s easy to say one doesn’t get involved but I’m sure it’s always there. I bet the companies are making a good buck. Tendered contract at a rate. So I ask again all the money raised through public donations where does this go? |
Amazing what lengths some people will go to to justify an organisation not paying people what they’re worth. GA as a whole has a terrible history of taking advantage of people. It’s quite enjoyable watching the industry as a whole at this part of the cycle where pilots are becoming a valuable commodity again and it’s the pilots fault for not being loyal to employers. Ha. |
Originally Posted by junior.VH-LFA
(Post 10574982)
Amazing what lengths some people will go to to justify an organisation not paying people what they’re worth. GA as a whole has a terrible history of taking advantage of people. It’s quite enjoyable watching the industry as a whole at this part of the cycle where pilots are becoming a valuable commodity again and it’s the pilots fault for not being loyal to employers. Ha. Once it was a simple handshake. How time has progressed. Companies have the leverage: too many pilots, having paid too much money for the available employment. Terms and conditions in a slow spiral ever since. However, demographics and the incredible success of the HR/IR reducing terms and conditions see insufficient supply. Rather amusing. The industry desperate to hold on to the status quo resorts to calls of loyalty and professionalism. The same thing they considered irrelevant for the last few decades. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10574945)
I too note only one pilot job on the RFDS website and that is for someone to warm a RHS on a B350 based at Jandakot and paying around $20K below the average Australian salary.. Strange for an outfit that claims it can't get pilots.
Sadly the overseas options we took have long since become "uneconomically viable" too. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10574973)
Don't feel sorry, feel ashamed!
|
Machtuk, I feel you buddy but you're getting trolled by the autists. Time to get off the internet.
|
Originally Posted by Obidiah
(Post 10574912)
Exactly!!
They get paid more because they are worth more, the pilots role on board is probably the least complex and least demanding of all three roles along with the fact the only role which has sensible (??) duty time restrictions. Nice trolling. |
Originally Posted by Cloudee
(Post 10574974)
A pilot doesn't need a degree, a nurse or a doctor does. Clearly you have no idea of the extra qualifications you need to work as a doctor or nurse for the RFDS but you can claim it to be tosh. You must be one of those skygods.
She thinks it’s extraordinary how little the pilots are valued by management, and is worried about the constantly lowering requirements to be considered for the (pilot) job. I wonder what would happen if the flight nurses simply refused to fly with low time pilots? |
Originally Posted by rcoight
(Post 10575299)
I’m an RFDS pilot. My partner is an RFDS flight nurse. Thus we have a lot more idea than you do, mate. She thinks it’s extraordinary how little the pilots are valued by management, and is worried about the constantly lowering requirements to be considered for the (pilot) job. I wonder what would happen if the flight nurses simply refused to fly with low time pilots? Read my posts again mate. I have no problem with RFDS pilots being paid more than they whatever they are getting, I don't doubt management want to lower costs by offering lower wages (and they still get inundated with pilot applicants). I was just replying to the guy who seems to think it is an affront to humanity if the pilot is not the highest paid person on board. |
Deja Vu,
Am I correct in understanding that you think a pilot with a university degree has achieved a degree of academic achievement equivalent to that achieved by a Doctor? ...or even a Nurse? |
Originally Posted by Cloudee
(Post 10575311)
Read my posts again mate. I have no problem with RFDS pilots being paid more than they whatever they are getting, I don't doubt management want to lower costs by offering lower wages (and they still get inundated with pilot applicants). I was just replying to the guy who seems to think it is an affront to humanity if the pilot is not the highest paid person on board.
They are now considering (and more) applications from people who wouldn’t have made the “filing cabinet” a few years ago. It is not unreasonable to ask why the entry standards have dropped so much. To be honest, the public should be asking this question. The obvious answer is that while historically RFDS has (rightly) been considered to be the very best of GA and a genuine long term career goal for the right people, in the current environment what they offer is simply not attractive enough to bring in the caliber of pilots the job requires. What’s happening now is that ****loads of low-time pilots are using RFDS to pump up their resume for a year or two and then leaving ASAP to that airline job they really wanted all along. |
What’s happening now is that ****loads of low-time pilots are using RFDS to pump up their resume for a year or two and then leaving ASAP to that airline job they really wanted all along. |
Originally Posted by Horatio Leafblower
(Post 10575316)
Deja Vu,
Am I correct in understanding that you think a pilot with a university degree has achieved a degree of academic achievement equivalent to that achieved by a Doctor? ...or even a Nurse? What this whole thread is about to me is that GA pilots do not receive sufficient renumeration to live a modest life and a comfortable retirement considering their responsibilities. This has mostly come about, in my view, by a supply and demand situation. Operators like the RFDS have taken advantage of this for many years and now claim that they can't get pilots to work for peanuts as easily any longer and so plead for the pilots to "give back to the sector" while happily paying up to $450K for a GP, if I am reading their website correctly. No one begrudges the Doctor or Nurse earning what they do, thats probably just market forces too. If we were to pay people based on "academic achievement" alone would aircraft refuellers be making $120K+, train drivers in the Pilbarra $250K+, Alan Joyce $24Million, plumbers $300K etc etc. ???. A look at the RFDS website shows one vacancy for a pilot in Dubbo, RHS for a B350 earning about the same as check out staff at woolies. There are numerous ads for EOI for pilot jobs, but these are not vacancies but an exercise in filling a filing cabinet with applications. No urgent shortage at all. I can't help, in my negative cynicism, suspect there is more at play here with this whole issue. |
Originally Posted by machtuk
(Post 10575245)
ok I feel ashamed for you then, sad either way you feel the need to be so negative about everything seeing as (I assume ) you never even worked for them! |
Originally Posted by spektrum
(Post 10572078)
How long is it to a Brisbane base with them?
|
Originally Posted by Horatio Leafblower
(Post 10575316)
Deja Vu,
Am I correct in understanding that you think a pilot with a university degree has achieved a degree of academic achievement equivalent to that achieved by a Doctor? ...or even a Nurse? |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10575761)
Its only hypothetical, of course, since neither of us ever worked for the good old "RUFFDUS", that if you had, you would have happily carried the doctor's bags out to the aircraft whilst they strolled out empty handed. I can picture it now.
|
Originally Posted by machtuk
(Post 10575795)
…....and you know this how? You obviously never worked for them but don't assume I never did!
I learned many years ago that in aviation never to assume anything, maybe you know the rest. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10575802)
Call it a gift if you like but I have the ability to pick a BS artist from a long way off. If you had ever worked for the RFDS ( as a pilot) we would have had a blow by blow description many posts ago, "AeroMed for many years and enough turbo prop time to sink a ship so only the jet for me". Spare us!
I learned many years ago that in aviation never to assume anything, maybe you know the rest. |
Originally Posted by machtuk
(Post 10575804)
Oh you are gifted alright, for all the wrong reasons! You really are sad angry case! Anyway lets just say you will never know my background as you think you have all the answers so continue being a nasty piece of work, something you are good at but entertaining I guess, in to the ignore list for you!!
Oh well there are lots more sycophants out there happy to denigrate the GA industry, lecture pilots on what they should accept and how they should think and generally advocate on behalf of opportunists like the good ole Ruffdus. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10575763)
Enter the Brisbane base in your GPS, it should show you the track and distance to the Brisbane base. Or you could apply to "them" and ask "them' how long. Unbelievable.
|
Originally Posted by rcoight
(Post 10575283)
That’s a joke, right? Nice trolling. Aside from my firm belief that both nurses and doctors level of academic qualification is above that of even an ATPL qualification, the fact that both doctors and nurses have a higher level of work intensity coupled with longer hours in any given RFDS day forms my belief they are both worth more than the pilot, hence why they are paid more. As I am aware the attrition rate is vastly more attributed to the lack of work life balance than that of pilot remuneration. Deja Vu; Midwifery is usually (at least until very recently) an extra qualification required of a flight nurse along with a solid ED background. |
Originally Posted by spektrum
(Post 10575903)
What is the harm in asking the question on the forum? Why are you such an angry person?
Never mind, Alice Kiwican, obviously a RFDS insider has come to your aid, ... |
Originally Posted by Obidiah
(Post 10575908)
No it wasn't and have I far more meaningful things to fill my day with than trolling.
Deja Vu; Midwifery is usually (at least until very recently) an extra qualification required of a flight nurse along with a solid ED background. Maybe you could spend your day meaningfully by checking the accuracy of the stuff you claim and are prepared to put into print. |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10575915)
Well I guess I was sort of reacting to someone who doesn't have the nouse to find this information for "themselves" , rather put out a general question and have someone else do all the investigation to answer your query. Having spent many years on the committees of pilot unions I have very little affinity for those who rely on others to do all the work on their behalf. How pathetic is that, how do you expect things to improve if you can't get off your backside and enquire for yourself? and then refer to those who do the hard yards as "autists" . Yeah I do get angry
Never mind, Alice Kiwican, obviously a RFDS insider has come to your aid, ... All I was after was someone to type 'x years'. It was not an onerous request yet you've spent how long responding to and getting riled up over something you had no real interest in. How angry do you get when something actually worth getting angry over occurs? Do become violent or do you know to take your meds before things escalate? |
Originally Posted by spektrum
(Post 10575943)
Rather than waste someones time at the organisation by calling, emailing etc, I figured the sensible thing to do FIRST would be to try my luck hoping someone in the know lurking these boards would volunteer the information.
All I was after was someone to type 'x years'. It was not an onerous request yet you've spent how long responding to and getting riled up over something you had no real interest in. How angry do you get when something actually worth getting angry over occurs? Do become violent or do you know to take your meds before things escalate? |
Originally Posted by deja vu
(Post 10575936)
Is that it? is midwifery required or not ? (usually or until recently, what the??? ) A far call from "extra substantial qualifications" required for doctors and nurses for RFDS operations.
Maybe you could spend your day meaningfully by checking the accuracy of the stuff you claim and are prepared to put into print. For what it's worth I just added that information for your benefit as you appeared to want to really drill down on another contributors post regarding such. It had been a requirement but there is some relaxation due to the difficulty in finding nurses with this qualification, likely now a case by case scenario. As for other extra qualifications I could not say, generally you will find the nurses are somewhat older than the average of the pool due to the years required to obtain the skill sets for the job. Maybe you could celebrate this small single point win with a champagne popper discharged in your mouth. |
What’s wrong with calling it what it is? It’s demanding and challenging work. Why wouldn’t you want the Pilot (with a capital) being paid extremely well. It reminds me of corporate jet owners who happily drop 60 mil on a machine yet push for cheaper Pilots? In both cases if I was down the back either on life support or drinking the best 18 YO I would like to know I had the best I could get up the front.......... |
Someone on this thread is hanging on just a bit too tightly. So much angst. I just hope they don’t fly aeroplanes for a living. Or for pleasure! |
Originally Posted by Obidiah
(Post 10575908)
....the fact that both doctors and nurses have a higher level of work intensity coupled with longer hours in any given RFDS day forms my belief they are both worth more than the pilot, hence why they are paid more..
Regardless, no one is suggesting the flight nurses don’t deserve what they get (they certainly do). The issue is that RFDS management have totally failed to recognise the reality of the pilot shortage and are still conducting themselves as though they have a mountain of high quality pilot applications to call on every time someone leaves. They don’t. And as a result they are heading very quickly towards what could be a real crisis for them. All they need to do is recognise what’s happening and make more effort to stop the pilots they already have from looking elsewhere. |
Pile-its (capital Pee) for the RFDS (or any other aeromed organisation doing single pilot stuff in tubrprops) need to be paid at least 160-170k if the companies want to keep an experience base. Plain and simple. This is what a level 3 FO grosses with Virgin and is more than fair considering all the extra duties and risks involved in the operation (7 sector unscheduled night, refuel your own aircraft, top up oxygen in addition to towing it into and out of the hangar). If the companies in question do not think this figure is appropriate, they have to be comfortable with the higher cost of training and a higher risk of incident/accident due to pilot inexperience and turnover. i also don’t think deja vu’s posts are aggressive or holding on too tight. They are repsonding to posters who seem to want to make the argument personal. But what would I know, I have to hold on tight, it’s so small you see. j3 |
What’s irrelevant is the argument about who is worth more on the aircraft. The point is RFDS pilots are not being paid enough for the experience and competencies required to consistently operate with the required margin of safety in their (sometimes) demanding operation.
Someone earlier stated an airline F/O grosses $160K. Bluntly, all he/she has to do is adhere to SOPs, fly the magenta line with full automation and retract the landing gear on command. I’d argue, in comparison to a single pilot RFDS pilot, that F/O is grossly overpaid. (A lot of airlines overseas are now throwing pimply faced, 200 hour pilots into the RHS of A330s.... ask yourselves, how demanding can that job really be?). To put the value of the RFDS pilots job in another albeit over dramatic perspective ... if the medical staff make an egregious mistake, they bury it. If a pilot does similar they bury him (and whoever else is on board). I’m pretty certain the medical crew on board any RFDS aircraft would be happy to know they have experienced, competent pilots up front being paid a reasonable wage. Deja Vu is right! GA stinks. |
Hopefully a few laughs to take some of the anger and heat out of this thread... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:56. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.