PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   ATSB Report on Tiger Moth stall/spin fatal accident (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/618935-atsb-report-tiger-moth-stall-spin-fatal-accident.html)

Centaurus 1st Mar 2019 06:48

ATSB Report on Tiger Moth stall/spin fatal accident
 
Another Tiger Moth stall/spin fatal accident. There have been a few of these in the past decade. None of these Tiger Moths had auto slats installed; their owners having removed them to decrease maintenance costs. These stall warning devices were very effective with their loud clacking as the slats moved in and out when the aircraft was approaching the stall.

In the accident concerned, the loud stall warning noise would have alerted the pilot to the impending danger in time for him to take recovery action and at least force land under control, rather than be caught by surprise and stall/spin at low altitude. As the old age says, if you think flight safety is expensive, try an accident.

How much would it cost owners of Tiger Moths to re-install auto slats as a safety measure?
https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...r/ao-2015-150/

Cloudee 1st Mar 2019 07:03

There are a lot of aircraft out there managing to avoid stalling without slats. I’d say there is a lot more in that report relevant to the incident than the slats.

Vag277 1st Mar 2019 07:45

Pilot says he applied opposite rudder but no indication of forward stick.

Capt Fathom 1st Mar 2019 09:57


Originally Posted by Vag277 (Post 10403624)
Pilot says he applied opposite rudder but no indication of forward stick.

Forward stick. That would be difficult to do at 200 feet and probably at least saved the pilots life by not doing so! There was no recovery from that height.

cowl flaps 1st Mar 2019 11:08

Looking at the aerial view of the flight path of the aircraft in the ATSB report, why did he attempt to turn left when a gentle right turn would have put him over a clear paddock, and maybe not have resulted in a stall ?

R755 1st Mar 2019 11:46

Aggressive forward stick would have been required. The pitch over needed to be aggressive to unload the wings and minimise speed loss. This was no time to look into the cockpit. Eyes on the target!. At the very least, a landing straight ahead, into the trees/scrub, could have been achieved at a modest ground speed.
The poor fellow might not have, during his type training, grasped the absolute importance of performing an aggressive pitch over, followed by a low speed accident into wind.
I vote in favour of Handley-Page auto slats. In addition to the noise, they provide the pilot with a wonderful visual depiction of stall development.

sablatnic 1st Mar 2019 11:47

Whenever the conversation touches Tiger Moths and spins I can't help thinking of this photo:
https://www.waggabiketyres.com/The%20Canon%201.jpg

Octane 1st Mar 2019 15:40


Originally Posted by sablatnic (Post 10403811)
Whenever the conversation touches Tiger Moths and spins I can't help thinking of this photo:
https://www.waggabiketyres.com/The%20Canon%201.jpg

How the hell did he survive that?!

aroa 1st Mar 2019 21:24

For Race 15. Is that what they call a straight -in approach ?

LeadSled 1st Mar 2019 22:22


Originally Posted by Octane (Post 10403987)
How the hell did he survive that?!

Folks,
That was one of three that flew formation aeros from the Tiger Club, based at Redhill, Surrey, UK in those days. The Canon, Deacon and Bishop. Maybe they had God on their side??
In about 1963, at Biggin Hill. somebody spun a Tiger in, on the field doing aeros overhead, both pilots survived, just bruises and cuts and scratches. --- the steel tube fuselage, really good harnesses and very slow speeds ---- it's Vsquared wot gets ya!!
Tootle pip!!

megan 1st Mar 2019 23:19

Stall warning systems were not a feature on British aircraft, if Auster & Chipmunk were any guide. Fail to see why Tigers should have slats fitted, they were a buyers option after all. Military probably fitted them as a make work item for ab initio training, instilling cockpit check procedures. We had similar make work items imposed during ab initio, no flap landings if a flag was flying beside the runway van, canopy open at certain stages of flight, both for no good reason, other than to instil discipline.

The aircraft in the OP's link had slats, you can see the left plainly extended.


With only a little over seven hours in the Tiger, the pilot would have had little experience with the aircrafts characteristics, low power, high drag, small speed range, factors pointed out in the report. Was he even aware of the slats "clacking", I certainly don't recall it now from my nearly six decades ago experience, it certainly wasn't a subject of the endorsement.

Centaurus 2nd Mar 2019 11:53


The aircraft in the OP's link had slats, you can see the left plainly extended.
Thanks Megan. First time I have seen that photo and you are right it did have slats fitted. Obviously owner option.

With only a little over seven hours in the Tiger, the pilot would have had little experience with the aircrafts characteristics, low power, high drag, small speed range, factors pointed out in the report.
That would suggest that whoever certified the pilot as competent to act in command on the TIger Moth neglected to ensure all the factors you mentioned were adequately covered.
The following extract is of interest from the book by Stephen Slater called De Havilland Tiger Moth 1931-1945 (all marks) Owners' Workshop Manual. Page 49-50 refers.
Quote:
"The upper wings of the majority of Tiger Moths are fitted with a further ingenious device to improve low-speed handling. Aerofoil-shaped slats (or 'slots') on the upper wings are held against the leading edge of the wing by air pressure in normal flight, but at speeds below around 60 mph(100kph) they progressively extend by 3in (75mm), encouraging the airflow to remain attached over the top surface of the outer wing, thereby slightly delaying the stall and making it more gentle when it occurs.

The slats which can be manually locked closed by a control on the right side of the rear cockpit, to avoid sudden deployment during aerobatics or unnecessary wear and tear when taxiing - were developed by another British aircraft designer, Sir Frederick Handley-Page. In addition to the cost of the slats and their controls, de Havilland had to pay a royalty of 38 pounds eleven shillings and sixpence on every set fitted as an extra cost option on pre-war Tiger Moths. However, all RAF-specification aeroplanes had them fitted." Unquote.

Icarus2001 3rd Mar 2019 07:27

I have several hundred hours in the Tiger Moth and all of them with the slats locked. If the lack of wind in your face does not give you an idea of speed and the view does not tell you something about the AoA then you probably should not be flying one.

CHAIRMAN 3rd Mar 2019 11:11


Whenever the conversation touches Tiger Moths and spins I can't help thinking of this photo:
https://www.waggabiketyres.com/The%20Canon%201.jpg
It was Lewis Benjamin I think, still writes in the Moth Club Magazine. He did spend some time in the hospital, apparently denying the newspaper reports he was killed in the crash.
Reading his exploits I reckon the guy has nine lives.

sheppey 3rd Mar 2019 13:36


I have several hundred hours in the Tiger Moth
Me too. Military and civil. Because they go unreported, you will never know how many lives have been saved because of their aural and visual warning characteristics. Good insurance and well worth any additional expense.

Cloudee 4th Mar 2019 06:15

I think it’s been shown this aircraft had slats so it’s a moot point if they save lives. Apparently not in this case. Of more interest is that the minimum type training required by this company was 5 hours. The accident pilot had less than this. The minimum tailwheel time required by the operator and by the insurance company was 25 hours. The accident pilot had less than this. The full length of the runway was not useable due to long grass. No lawnmower? The pilot made a substantial turn to the left 2 seconds after take off followed by a turn back to the right to give more time to gain height to fly over obstacles. The young pilot had no supervision or help on this day, he had to get out of this aircraft with the motor running twice.

B2N2 4th Mar 2019 06:51

If anything it shows you that an accident has many facets and can be days or weeks or months in the making.
None of the following are a clear cause but have contributed in a small part
  • low time on type
  • tall grass preventing use of full length
  • gusty wind conditions
  • questionable turns right after take off

roundsounds 4th Mar 2019 07:21


Originally Posted by B2N2 (Post 10406260)
If anything it shows you that an accident has many facets and can be days or weeks or months in the making.
None of the following are a clear cause but have contributed in a small part
  • low time on type
  • tall grass preventing use of full length
  • gusty wind conditions
  • questionable turns right after take off

It is interesting the carburettor float coating was cracked. There have been a number of accidents involving Tigers over the years following unexplained engine failures. Have a read of this article, also note CASA have not issued any airworthiness advices to the best of my knowledge.
If you have a crack in the varnish, fuel can get into the cork, as it heats up it will expand and may result in the float sticking causing a rich or lean mixture.
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....4bf4007d8.jpeg

megan 4th Mar 2019 22:29


I think it’s been shown this aircraft had slats so it’s a moot point if they save lives. Apparently not in this case.
Agree it's really moot Cloudee. Stall/spin accidents feature regularly in accident reports, and that's with modern aircraft fitted with stall warning systems. The US had 2,015 stall accidents between 2000 and 2014, and stalls account for nearly 25% of fatal accidents.

Unfortunately too, spin training is no longer part of the curriculum, few aircraft are cleared for spinning.

https://www.aopa.org/-/media/files/a...spin.pdf?la=en

runway16 5th Mar 2019 02:56

Not stated to date is that, as I recall, the pilot, although a new graduate to the Tiger Moth, had recently flown a Cirrus SR-22 around the world.

A big difference in the handling of a DH82 Tiger Moth and a Cirrus CR-22.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.