PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   ATSB Report on Tiger Moth stall/spin fatal accident (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/618935-atsb-report-tiger-moth-stall-spin-fatal-accident.html)

fatboywings 19th Mar 2019 20:05

I guess we now wait for the coronial inquest. Does anyone know how long it takes from the report released by the ATSB till the inquest is scheduled?

Judd 20th Mar 2019 14:14


I would normally leave the slats unlocked for takeoff and landing, unless the crosswind was near the limit.
That was the correct procedure taught at RAAF flying training schools in the 1950's. However there was nothing about crosswinds and associated slat use in the Pilots Notes for the type. Methinks it sounds like someone's personal opinion rather than the manufacturer's recommended procedure? .

roundsounds 20th Mar 2019 18:29


Originally Posted by Judd (Post 10424740)
That was the correct procedure taught at RAAF flying training schools in the 1950's. However there was nothing about crosswinds and associated slat use in the Pilots Notes for the type. Methinks it sounds like someone's personal opinion rather than the manufacturer's recommended procedure? .

You are correct the RAAF pilot notes state slats are to be unlocked for takeoff and landing. However the aircraft were never operated on sealed runways and were fitted with tail skids and had no brakes, this resulted in them being very limited in any crosswind. The Tigers I flew commercially all had brakes and tailwheels and often flown in crosswinds at the limit. After a few near wing tip scrapes during early takeoff roll / late landing roll, I found locking the slats reduced the tendency to lift a wing. Part of my Tiger pre takeoff and landing checks involves considering slats locked / unlocked based on observed crosswind.

Nuasea 21st Mar 2019 06:46

Fuel contamination
 
Although fuel analysis revealed no indication of water, it was always the RAF practice to fill Chipmunk fuel tanks completely at the end of the day’s flying to avoid condensation within the tanks collecting st the bottom. By the pilots own admission, this was never done with his aircraft so could water droplets have entered the carburettor during the take off and caused the loss in power.

desert goat 21st Mar 2019 10:26


Originally Posted by Nuasea (Post 10425384)
Although fuel analysis revealed no indication of water, it was always the RAF practice to fill Chipmunk fuel tanks completely at the end of the day’s flying to avoid condensation within the tanks collecting st the bottom. By the pilots own admission, this was never done with his aircraft so could water droplets have entered the carburettor during the take off and caused the loss in power.

All good in theory, except that in this day and age leaving an aircraft full of fuel overnight just increases the likelyhood that your fuel will go missing overnight. As to whether it could have been a factor, well of course it "could" have been....as could an awful lot of other things. Which is why we have ATSB investigators whose job it is to mull it over.

Nuasea 21st Mar 2019 18:39


Originally Posted by desert goat (Post 10425584)


All good in theory, except that in this day and age leaving an aircraft full of fuel overnight just increases the likelyhood that your fuel will go missing overnight. As to whether it could have been a factor, well of course it "could" have been....as could an awful lot of other things. Which is why we have ATSB investigators whose job it is to mull it over.

You are very dismissive of a known fact they may not have considered.

Nuasea 21st Mar 2019 23:42

Carb Iciing
 
Did the ATSB consider carb icing? What was the temperature and humidity?

Nuasea 22nd Mar 2019 00:02

Calculate carb icing CAA
 
temp was around 24C. Dew point unknown.

https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/file...cing_chart.pdf

j3pipercub 22nd Mar 2019 02:40

What are you trying to prove?

Nuasea 22nd Mar 2019 17:26

Carb icing
 

Originally Posted by j3pipercub (Post 10426342)
What are you trying to prove?

Eliminate carb icing as the cause of the loss of engine power.

desert goat 23rd Mar 2019 00:46

Well, if you wish to involve yourself in the investigation then here is some information as to how you can best go about it.

https://www.atsb.gov.au/about_atsb/employment/

megan 23rd Mar 2019 01:10


Did the ATSB consider carb icing? What was the temperature and humidity?
No need to. The Gipsy in the Tiger runs on "hot" air all the time, there is no "carb air hot/cold" selector.

Nuasea 23rd Mar 2019 02:04

Carb air icing
 

Originally Posted by megan (Post 10427257)
No need to. The Gipsy in the Tiger runs on "hot" air all the time, there is no "carb air hot/cold" selector.

Thank you for the information but note that hot air is not available at full power, see NZ incident that follows

Cloudee 23rd Mar 2019 02:14

There was a similar accident in NZ a few years ago and this was their comment on the carburettor:

”The Gypsy Major engine employs automatic carburettor heat, in the form of a spring-loaded butterfly valve, interconnected with the throttle control so that at full throttle cold air is admitted, but at cruise, warm air from the engine bay is admitted through a flame trap. The spring applies 4-5 kg of load to keep the valve in the warm air position in cruise. If the throttle friction nut is not firmly applied before take-off, the spring will cause the throttle to back off if the pilot’s hand is removed from it.”
https://www.caa.govt.nz/Accidents_an..._18Oct2003.pdf

Pinky the pilot 24th Mar 2019 06:10

The following has absolutely nothing to do with the actual subject of the thread, but some fellow ppruners may find it interesting;

As I type this there is a glass of a good Barossa Shiraz in front of me..:D oh yes, and my late Father's RAAF log book.:=

On the first page it notes that he flew his first solo at No 1 EFTS Parafield, in DH 82 AM-624 on August 9th 1943, having previously logged 10hrs 50 minutes Flying Instruction time. His Instructor was for the most part a F/O Craven.

I remember Dad telling me that he sang out loud to himself for the entire circuit!:D

I also remember one of his favourite sayings which related across to being a Glider Instructor many years later was,
I saw him crash, I saw him burn.
He held off bank in a Gliding turn.



His relation of the story of the Yankee Marauder Pilot who crashed his aircraft off the end of one runway is a story for another thread.

flywatcher 24th Mar 2019 23:19

In my younger days in Tigers and Austers I was always told "Hold off bank in a gliding turn, and you will surely crash and burn." It must have taken a lot of lives to produce that little rhyme, it is surely one that was written in blood.

Centaurus 25th Mar 2019 08:22


Tigermoth can comfortably be flown in S and L at 30 knots or less by a pilot with sufficient training on type by an instructor with knowledge and experience on type.
Wouldn't the position error at that angle of attack make the IAS an unreliable indication of the real airspeed?

jonkster 25th Mar 2019 09:18


Originally Posted by Pinky the pilot (Post 10428117)
On the first page it notes that he flew his first solo at No 1 EFTS Parafield, in DH 82 AM-624 on August 9th 1943, having previously logged 10hrs 50 minutes Flying Instruction time. His Instructor was for the most part a F/O Craven.

I also remember one of his favourite sayings which related across to being a Glider Instructor many years later was,
I saw him crash, I saw him burn.
He held off bank in a Gliding turn.

I remember that rhyme!

Slightly different wording: "watch him spin, watch him burn, held off bank in a gliding turn". I still tell some of my students it, so it lives on.

It was told to me by my father, when I was learning to fly.

Reading your post and that long remembered rhyme made me hunt up his log book.

He did his first solo in A17-451 after being sent by F/O Stevens. Most of his training was by Sgt Irvine.
(10 EFTS Temora, Nov 1942.)

It took him 5 minutes longer than yours though. Dad needed 10:55 dual :)

fatboywings 28th Mar 2019 19:40


Originally Posted by Centaurus (Post 10429022)
Wouldn't the position error at that angle of attack make the IAS an unreliable indication of the real airspeed?

not necessarily. The tiger will become airborne at about 25 knots and you are know where near a 3 point attitude. How ever, there is some merit to what you say at high angles of attack. At IAS of about 28knots or less at high AOA the the instrument can read zero.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:01.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.