Originally Posted by Squawk7700
(Post 10144064)
841 posts and nobody has mentioned control/gust/rudder locks... just sayin'...
|
Originally Posted by sms777
(Post 10144468)
I mentioned friction locks in post #578 and there were discussion about other control locks there after........so it has been covered.
|
Having not been behind the controls of a KA I wouldn't know, however and RFDS pilot mentioned it was possible to taxi with at least one of the *control* locks in place. It happened to the Gulstream in the US not long back. |
That means it likely hasn't even gone to the DIPs yet, if it had the status should be "Final Report: External Review". This makes a mockery of the statements by the ATSB CEO that they have both the funding and the organisation structure to complete complex reports within 12 months. This is an organisation that is not fulfilling its charter. |
Having spoken to ATSB, expect to see the report in Octoberish, currently being finalised internally
|
Really dose it matter if the outcome is 12 months or 24 months if there was no mechanical defect which caused this accident which could lead to other accidents within the same type of aircraft. There has been no ADs etc from this accident issued. With this I mind it leaves over developments which cause this accident which can be assumed are off the one off type. I would rather see a complaint result than if but maybe. But realistically I don’t think we will really ever know what the real cause was. But rest assured ATSB will find a cause for the accident even if it’s no true and correct |
Buckingham inflatable drive magnesium Hansard.
|
The cause is known by ATSB and those that need to know why, already know. It's in review. |
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
(Post 10144064)
841 posts and nobody has mentioned control/gust/rudder locks... just sayin'...
The cause is known by ATSB and those that need to know why, already know. It's in review. |
Nope. The lock theory was from a KA driver. If the report is at the involved parties or internal review stage, those that need to know will already know. Of course those people that do already know, are smart enough to keep their mouth closed due to the litigious world in which we live. |
Not everyone is that smart! :oh: |
What, like the person in a high profile public position (that should know better) sprouting from the tree-tops as to why the Beaver went in? |
But rest assured ATSB will find a cause for the accident even if it’s no true and correct If so, it would be a useful Rule for the ATSB to adopt. At least it gives a sound reason for operators to review where applicable, their training policies for that type, rather than be left to speculate and pretend it will never happen to them. |
US NTSB are required to publish a Most Probable Cause of an accident if they are unable to prove the factual "real" cause. |
Heard today that there’s little doubt by those in the know that it’s friction locks. After maintenance, if the locks are loose, the left throttle retards causing a bank to the left. Similar accident in the US recently. One every 10 years I was told... |
:ok: ......... |
Originally Posted by kellykelpie
(Post 10146422)
Heard today that there’s little doubt by those in the know that it’s friction locks. After maintenance, if the locks are loose, the left throttle retards causing a bank to the left. Similar accident in the US recently. One every 10 years I was told... I have my own gut feeling as to what may have occurred. I can think of several plausible scenarios based on face value and the information presented thus far, but other than talking about generalities and tech specs I'm not voicing my gut feeling as I want to wait for the report. PS; it doesn't even need to be maintenance that has loosened them. Frictions are a specific checklist item, straight from the horse's mouth (manufacturer). Both/either can slide back, not just the left (though the left is the more likely one to do so). |
Oh I hope this isn't so, that it was something as simple as a Friction Lock :(
|
Know nothing about KingAir throttle friction nuts. Therefore showing technical ignorance here. But if its job to prevent the throttles from falling back if your hand is removed, wouldn't the pilot merely keep the two throttles up at take off power manually instead of removing his hand from there during the takeoff roll?
|
Originally Posted by sheppey
(Post 10146574)
Know nothing about KingAir throttle friction nuts. Therefore showing technical ignorance here. But if its job to prevent the throttles from falling back if your hand is removed, wouldn't the pilot merely keep the two throttles up at take off power manually instead of removing his hand from there during the takeoff roll?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:57. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.