Barwon Heads Airport Closed
 

Dear Barwon Heads Airport users,

Due to the use of agriculture equipment adjoining the east west runway and frequent crossing of personnel and equipment the Eastern End of the East West runway will be closed this weekend being the 19th & 20th of May 2007 to all aircraft, Geelong Aero Club Members, Barwon Heads Airport Leases, and persons not directed by Luke McWilliam.

Sorry for any inconveniences caused.

Kind Regards

Body Pilot :ok:

DORK is about all anybody could say!!!!!

North-South is the most used so what is the problem????

Body Pilot Went past that place today and the airfield was not CLOSED but the east-west lower section was crossed so a tractor could cross the runway once every three hours. Must have been a better way to organize this event than doing a stupid thing like that.

East West runway
 

Dear airport user

We may need to do some more ploughing in the paddocks over the weekend being the 26th and 27th May 2007,

The tractor can only fit through the double gates that are adjacent to the eastern end of the East West runway, therefore please note that the eastern end of the East West runway at Barwon Heads may be closed whilst ploughing is in progress.

I do not wish to revisit the allegations and concerns about some of the staff and tenants who have previously acted in a manner to intimidate persons crossing the runway and hampering the access of an emergency vehicle. This said; if the winds are from the east or the west, we will endeavour to keep the eastern end of the East West runway open as much as possible.

Blue skies and safe flying


Kind Regards

Body Pilot:ok:

Body Pilot

Keep it up you will start to believe your own BULL***T

To Body Pilot/Luke/Dork you moron.

From all accounts you did not advise the owner of the airport that you were closing the small section of the east west runway on your land because you wanted your ploughmaster to turn some dirt for you in the nothern paddock.

You always have said you want cooperation, but it is your decision and your actions that make the situation difficult, as usual, and this is just another example.

You could have got the machinery through the back gates to your property but this would have meant that you would not have had reason to interfere with the operation of the airfield which you are no longer qualified to use.

As if that was not enough you then had the ploughmaster park the tractor alongside the east west runway for the week causing it to be shut down for the week, and I don't know where to contact the driver. Maybe you should ask blondie, she would know, certainly appeared to be very friendly after alighting the tractor at the weekend but then the driver had his hands full of ???

You are an absolute moron who should not be allowed back on or near an airfield, and as for the collections of stones in the back paddock for a landing area for dirt darts, forget it you are wasting your time, it will not be allowed and if you think you have a fight now, it is nothing to what will follow.

Body Pilot/Luke/Dork can't you understand that you ae not wanted and will not be tolerated at or near BHA and the longer it goes the deeper the hole you dig for yoruself.

John Walters

This STUPID man is still at it? why does he keep flogging a dead horse? can he not see the time is here to say ta ta and dance away to the Skydiver Kingdom somewhere else!!

Me thinks the runway should be closed (All of em) any time that Fairy Feet wants to land his Mates Machine on this Airfield. Why the hell should he be able to close the east end anytime for no good reason when the strip has been a right of way for over thirty years.

He sees fit to cross a tractor once every three hours to commit a disturbance to all aviation not just BH traffic GROW UP YOU DUMB Dancing Boy, hope the snake he imported a few years back is breeding if not he will have no company on his many adventures rock chasing.

AAHHH I take it back let his mate land otherwise we would be silly as him.

More Legal Action
 

I sense more legal action pending over this one. It seems this is the only way to get any kind of response from this mad man. In fact he seems to welcome such conflict.

Such a sad little man with a sad little brain. Has a severe defficiency in the common sense centre of his brain. Too much money available too.

:ugh:

If only the rest of us had a clue what the hell you're talking about.

Sure Is Closed

to Skydivers:D

see the AAT decision


pol:ok:

Peter, they don't call the area the 3 ring circus for nothing.

Read the report and you will see who the Wa***R was.

A culture of recklessness
 

The AAT report refelects a culture of recklessness and a complete disregard for safety and regulatory compliance. Add to this a contempt for those in authority and you can understand the demise of this operation.

I only trust that wherever SKYDIVE CITY moves to, that those involved read this AAT report and note the warning contained within.

fluffy

If one reads the AAT decision (and has the mental capability of understanding the written word) it is blatantly obvious that the three ring circus comprises

Luke McWilliam, Greg Bayle and the CEO of the APF Graham Windsor. :\

Porch monkey had to have a say and obviously has the brains of a gnat and that will be confirmed with his next post.:8

sheets:ok:

Wasn't there a bit in the 10 thingy's that prohibited personal attacks?.
seems thats all this thread, and the other one like it consists of.
Must be special rules for the Barwon heads mob I guess.

IBTS
 

the wizard of auz

If you don’t like what you read MOVE ON

Great first post old mate. :ugh:
About as productive and informative as the rest of this thread. enjoy it, as you obviously one of the privileged with a new username (another one) that can do as they please on here.
Oh dear........I'll probably get banned again for commenting on your thread.....I'm orf outta here....... Adios. :hmm::rolleyes:

Say hello to Alison Wizfiz

Obviously the wizard of auz/the knowall of auz (with over 2000 posts he must know it all, or has an opinion on it all) has had very little to add to this thread and really couldn't care less that after all this time the authorities have finally stopped a parachute operation that could not operate to the regulations set for parachuting making it safe for ALL aviators.
Big brother has spoken for all of us finally stopping an unsafe operation, and it now appears the three ring circus has to find another drop site, sadely for those who did drop at BHA a few years ago and followed the regs.
I have been to BHA and it is a great area for recreational flying including parachuting with Bass Strait/Coast to the south, Port Phillip Bay/Melbourne to the north, The Rip and Mornington Peninsular to the East and the Great Ocean Road and The Otways to the west. All this can be seen when airborne over BHA making it one of the great areas to fly in Oz.
Sadly there have been some vitriolic comments by some in relation to the operations at BHA over the years on various threads but to a degree I can now understand the frustration that has been caused by the 'circus' and the lack of action by the governing authorities.
That frustration has now been halted by the decision of the AAT.
After reading the decision on the AAT site it is now up to the parachute federation to take the action they should have taken years ago and stop those who were part of the parachute operation at BHA from having any further involvement in conducting a parachute operation anywhere else in Oz.
To those at BHA who have continued to fight this cowboy operator, you have done the right thing for all those who use BHA or may want to use it in future. We can now visit BHA knowing that we will not be confronted by parachutes.

Actually, it might surprise you, but the 3 ring circus has nothing to do with the skydivers, they came along later. You have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a ****. For the benefit of Peter, the 3 ring circus has long referred to the triangle of airports that make up the local CTAF. Since most of you haven't been around all that long, you may not know. In any case, I might point out that the incumbents at Barwon Heads were warned well in advance of lukey boys antics and lack of control, yet they chose to allow him in and to take his money. Sorry guys, you bought the whole thing on yourselves........

Rest assured I have no sympathy for either side.

Porch monkey

I must clarify this situation

The Guy’s didn’t choose to take him on at all.

The Airport owner (one person) did.

The Guy’s as you put it and I’m one, got caught up in the **** fight because they reported the breaches of safety regulations.

There have been many mentions of the three ring circus in relation to the dirtdart saga at BHA and seeing the other Airports are not involved maybe the three clowns mentioned in the AAT decision fit the bill.

pol:ok:

Oh as for the wiz, who would bother?:sad:

You will note that I have refrained from the individual attack, as I well understand that many of you were not there when certain decisions were made - Fair enough. Whether the circus bit fits the skydivers or not wasn't my point, I was clarifying my use of the "3 ring circus" quote in it's original context. As I said, I don't have any favourites in this, certain people were warned about it, but sadly, chose to ignore and both sides have suffered as a consequence..........

You have pretty much got it right POQL and I endorse what you say in relation to the Parachute Federation, They have played a major part in this mess by doing nothing and surely must now act to ensure that no other airfield in faced with this operator who will not follow the regulations and has a history of setting his own rules.

I also believe porch monkey has got it right. The early references to the three ring circus on the various threads did relate to the three airfields in the CTAF area but has later been referenced to the parachute operation, and yes I understand the owner was warned of McWilliam but a month of abiding to all the regulations and showing that he could fit in was accepted with the dollars that were promised.

History now shows it was a disastrous decision that was made for all using the airfield, and only recently Frank Connell a hanger owner agreed to allow McWilliam to continue to use his hangar to conduct his parachuting business.
A decision again made for the greedy dollar.

Hopefully for all concerned this debacle on an airfield with great potential for recreational flying will be in the past and the developments being suggested will go ahead.

Geez POL, RS480, PQOL,inthefluffystuff and all the other names you post under.
I am happy for you that you have whatever it is you think you achieved, but...... every time someone you have some sort of problem with, farts, picks their nose or whatever, another Barwon heads thread appears and then there is all the crap you dribble about public safety to make it legitimate. (yeah, lets hear about your safety record then shall we....... you know of what I speak of :eek:)
a rational (yeah I know, you wouldn't know what that is) discussion is fine and even a plan of action resolved, but you clowns all just bitch and moan and carry on about the same crap in every thread, and then descend into personal insults with anyone that either disagrees with you or calls you for what you are. you had your win, and good onya..... so get over it. Its no wonder the dude smacked some of you around. I'm sure a saint would be driven to distraction with you bunch of mouthy clowns and belt you as well.

Come on Tailwheel, do the right thing........ and that isnt the same as what you did last time I mentioned something on one of these ridicules threads they keep posting.

After sitting quietly and watching this crap go on for so long, I must say that P.M. and W.O.Z. are both 100% on the money. One of the rings of this circus did warn the BWH gang not to touch L.Mc with a barge pole many moons ago, but look what happened. Was all the money worth it??? I dont think so. It will be interesting to see how long it takes for the Drop Zone to start up again under the rule of someone else. As we all know, the demise of any good airport is the callibah of the Muppets running the Aero Club.:ugh:

Cant we have a ban on BWH threads? sick of seeing them. Maybe we could ask to have the same restriction put on it as M@CAIR.

Yes yes PLEASE!!! Ban it, ban them all. Once upon a time I had some sympathy for Barb and co but after 3 years of bitching and insults and over use of massive bold type about some little victorian backwater, it is getting rather tiring. No one cares. Go team McWilliam!

Why not just ignore it.
 

If the posts re BHA are such crap, then why not just ignore them. Silence is a potent tool. The fact that this thread keeps going means it is generating interest. Remember that other people are entitled to a viewpoint other than yours.

Wiz

My Opinion is that you arrive at this site to see what can be done to stir the pot a bit, why if you are so against this site come here to even look at the posts. I know it is your freedom to do so as it is mine but hey I have this mouse button and press it and bingo it is gone.

Why do you say to a poster (Pall) that he is not so anonymous, his comments do seem rational to me? anyhow powww and im gone!!!

I'm a big boy now!
 

Don't worry about me, I am a big boy now and don't care what others think of me.

Wiz, I agree that some of the posts re BHA can be futile and petty. Still some of those people posting still are my friends.

Keep in mind that we have endured years of safety abuses and inaction from the authorities. Now we can get on with perusing our love of aviation free of abuse and stupidity.

If BHA is a turn off for people they don't have to come there or associate with us. I still maintain that it is a friendly place to visit.

inbetweenthesheets
 

Inbetweenthesheets I have taken your advice and read the decision, this is my opinion. I do not think you realise what the ramifications you and your friends have made on the rest of General Aviation. Indeed this decision gives CASA the power to remove licences, frustrate contractual relationships and change airspace without true cause.

My view is that member Egon Fice did not want to hear the case and appeared to use any previous decisions including those made by his superior, Deputy Prisident S.A. Forgie and some obscure cases in immigration to limit or restrict the right for review.

In paragraph 21, Egon Fice makes reference to the resumed complaints but does not state the outcomes of any investigations. How do we know if these alleged complaints were indeed justified. Surely this is a pivotal point as parachuting activities were allowed to re-occur, and models put in place by CASA to ensure the safety of air users and members of the public.

Paragraph 23. So what, if Mrs Begg wants to build hangars in some paddock, she has clearly leased it out for parachute operations. CASA should not be used to frustrate contractual relationships, just because the owner wishes to change the use.

Paragraph 31. It would appear that CASA was happy to continue parachute operations after 29th January 2004, subject to conditions. However, after the 6th April 2005 CASA believed Luke McWilliam, Greg Bayley and Skydive City engaged in conduct that constituted the serious risk to aviation safety in relation to the previous instruments. I therefore would expect to read the results of investigations between these times, however there appears to be none other that references given to complaints and Andrew Ward allegedly seeing parachutists going through cloud. How does allowing these people to skydive in all other areas suddenly make them safe?

I find the comments made about the proposed dangers to the public at large somewhat exaggerated. Barwon Heads and Bankstown are clearly poles apart. No supporting evidence was given on risk assessment. Any aircraft has the potential to crash so should we ban all aviation? Or we can take it one step further and ban all modes of transport.

Paragraph 70. An authorised Fisheries Officer, What where fish in “them” clouds?

What makes Approved parachuting through cloud safe, apposed to unapproved? In the fine print in this case appears Mrs Begg (Para 83.)

Paragraph 90. It is my understanding that there has been “a complete breakdown of co-operation” in the Geelong CTAF for years. So should be closed down all flying in the Geelong area? Or should they all be locked up in there hangers?

Paragraph 93. All the “voluminous reports” stop out side the Geelong CTAF, why? The same pilots who drop same parachutists at other airports don’t get them same “voluminous reports”

It’s clear the rest of the world has a different view on what is conflicting traffic. It would appear Mr Marcolin from CASA summed the whole situation up, “…from what I have to date it is clear to me that CASA is being used to provide operational restrictions on a legitimate aviation activity, i.e. parachuting, for reasons other than legitimate safety grounds, albeit that this whole saga may have had it geneses based on some genuine safety concern.”:=

VH-EFS

I suggest you sit down and read the report more meticulously, have the CASA and APF regs. handy and you may appreciate some of the following.

CASA always has had the power to remove licences and change airspace and in doing may frustrate contractual relationships.

As to doing so without true cause, I doubt that would occur and if it did the harmed party has the option to have the decision reviewed by the federal Court or the AAT.

As in any legal case the Adjudicator will refer to previous decisions that relate to the matter at hand.
In this case any previous decision relating to right for review is pertinent.

I have not seen any documentation that would support your claim
“Egon Fice did not want to hear the case”
and indeed he allowed all arguments to be heard without constraint (obviously you never attended the hearing).

With regard to para 21 we don’t have to know if the complaints were justified as it is not up to “we” to make the determination in relation to the safety of air usere and members of the public.

The incident reports are forwarded to CASA for investigation and I am sure if the reports proved to be unjustified CASA would not have acted upon them.

The proposed models you refer were just that proposed, they were found to be unworkable and neve introduced.

The airport is private property and CASA cannot dictate to the owner what uses the property will be used for.

In relation to Para 23 you state “some paddock, she has clearly leased it out for parachute operations”
Obviously you have privy to her contractual obligations, or is it an assumption, I am of the belief that the existence of a lease is to be determined in the Federal Court within the next few weeks.

Para. 31 It does appear CASA was happy to continue parachute operations providing those operations were within the regulations, but clearly Luke McWilliam, Greg Bayley and Skydive City were unable or unwilling to comply with those regulations creating a serious risk to air navigational safety and to the safety of general public.

The results of the investigations were made available to those involved; maybe you should have a look at the Magistrates Court cases for the findings.

The findings by Fice do not make it safe for these people to skydive in other areas only BHA, but to place an order to prevent them doing so is restrictive trade.




Your comment regarding the proposed dangers to the public at large being exaggerated is a little over the top, do you believe the public at large in Bankstown are entitled to be exposed to less danger than those at Barwon Heads or is it safety for one and all?
You are right in saying any aircraft has the potential to crash but does mean all that can be done within reason to prevent a disaster should not be done.

In relation to Para 70 one does not have to be a Rhode scholar to appreciate that the Chairman is alluding to the fact that a Fisheries Officer is credible and above reproach.

I relation to jumping thru cloud I suggest you read the regulations placed on organisations that have approval to parachute thru cloud; you should have done so prior to writing.

The breakdown in co-operation was between a skydiver operator refusing to comply with CASA and APF regulations and other users of the airport attempting to have all operations conducted safely.

Obviously all reports stopped outside the Geelong CTAF because that is where McWilliam and Skydive city operated.

It’s clear the rest of the world has a different view on what is conflicting traffic

I have overlooked your sarcastic little digs up to now but the above statement brings you down to the level of The Wizard of Auz.( must be in the WA water)

sheets:ok:

:ugh::ugh: Just had to do it huh?.
Now the thread has become an almost sensible conversation, I'll take my poor grammar and spelling and go and have a look at the report.

Just for clarity, Does the operator in question have a neighboring property with a strip?. Some of the previous posts/threads indicated something along these lines.

Yes. Ahh... make that "no". It's not a runway, it's a road.... complete with tyre markers either side, and wide enough for a plane - ahh... a truck... Looks to be 20m long and about 500 or so wide.

Very observant Thunderbird, but is dat der irish strip 20mts. long x 500mts. wide?

correct. to be sure to be sure.

looks like a couple of posts have been omitted from last night by the moderators suggesting that McWilliam relocate and giving his contact number. They were probably right in doing this!!!

Having followed this post for a long time, there have been many postings supporting McWilliam and his parachuting operation at Barwon Heads, and last night someone suggested that now is the time for his supporters to come up with suggestions and support as to where he can relocate.

The AAT have affirmed their earlier decision to ban parachuting within 2 miles of Barwon Heads and this has now put an end to McWilliams ambitions to take over the Barwon Heads airport. Co-operation may have saved his operation and he will not be given approval to operate from a road on his property next door by the local Council.

For all those supporters, Insider ACCC etc etc now is your chance to offer your support to have McWilliam operate from your prefered airport.

This we know will not happen. You were happy to support him while he operated at another airport, and you keep your airfield a safe operation, and let others take the chance.

It has been confirmed an application to Yarrawonga has seen the crew there revolt and "we do not want him here".

What McWilliam wants is a paddock somewhere where he can put an airstrip and drop dirtdarts whenever he wants. To hell with the required rules and regulations of CASA and the APF. There must be somewhere he can be accommodated??

And whilst mentioning the APF have a look at their website, They have massive problems with their new CEO, sacks all the staff, creating a massive upheavil in parachuting circles, and it appears they are now ruddrless and seeking more volunteers to run the show.

This situation should be a concern to all aviators including the parachute fraternity. Rule makers that cannot enforce the rules is a worry to all. Maybe time for CASA to withhold their hefty grant of around $100000 and take control until the APF can demonstrate they are a responsible body to take control of parachuting within Australia.

It would appear all of these problems having been created by a parachute operator who believed he was beyond the rules and regulations and has now brought problems to parachuting Australia wide.

Where is the Insider, ACCC and the rest of his supporters, he needs your help.

If the guy has problems following rules and regs, and is a risk to public safety, maybe its better he doesn't get anywhere to operate from.

Hey Wizza

Looks like you might be on the ball at last.:ok:

But there’s more to come JUST WATCH THIS THREAD, McSkydive has filled his pants with nuggets and I don’t mean gold!!!!:ooh:

pol:D