PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   Photo Licence (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/194091-photo-licence.html)

Trav737-400 13th Oct 2005 13:12

Photo Licence
 
Hi, I am applying for my photo licence and police check as I currently hold a PPL . Anyway I just want to confirm whether I have to pay any fees for this as I cannot find any reference to actual fees on the application or the CASA website. Thanks

NZLeardriver 13th Oct 2005 16:15

From the CASA website:

Update 28 September 2005

Currently there are no fees for the aviation security check or the issue of the photographic licence and Aviation Identification.

dude65 13th Oct 2005 23:03

Currently no charge as NZL has stated.

I wouldn't be holding my breath on anything coming back before Christmas. Mine is 7 weeks and counting. I rang them 2 weeks ago and was told the hold up isn't with CASA but with the AFP. Apparently up to 5000 applications currently in the system.

nascar3 14th Oct 2005 10:17

I have heard that CASA will start charging for photo licences after 1 January 2006

Another issue I heard other day is that the agencies doing the security check i.e. AFP, ASIO and immigration are too busy doing checks for the Commonwealth Games and pilot licences will take second place.

triadic 14th Oct 2005 12:21

Got mine this week..... applied in Feb !! :confused:

john_tullamarine 14th Oct 2005 13:11

... and isn't it a scrappy bit of kit .. one would think that they could produce something a bit classier ...

DeltaT 14th Oct 2005 23:04

Are you guys sure about all this?
I telephone CASA only about 2 weeks ago and they said its usually all done in 3-4 weeks.

dude65 14th Oct 2005 23:32

DeltaT

Yep, I'm pretty sure this is how it's turning out for most people.

When I took mine into the local CASA office I was told 3-4 weeks. That was 7 plus weeks ago. I was also told that new licences were being done ahead of existing ones. If your an existing PPL holder your application goes to the bottom of the pile.

Doesn't look like the AFP were ready for this.

contactdepartures 15th Oct 2005 00:25

dude65 - weren't casa upgrading their systems during september and didn't want any applications of any sort sent in? so they've probably been slammed in the first few weeks of october with over 1 1/2 months worth of paperwork to process and it is taking them a while to get through everything.....

triadic 15th Oct 2005 00:53

John t. Agreed. looks photocopied to me and they have changed the fonts size and formatting. Even the stamp on the 1st page is part of the photocopy. No orig signiture or stamp... very poor

They must have changed the way endorsements are shown, as all mine have been changed and resequenced. Now have a manual prop not a CSU ??

Thats what you get with mass production I guess...!!
:( :(

dude65 15th Oct 2005 01:44

CD

Didn't hear anything about CASA not accepting applications when I lodged mine in early September. With a 31 December deadline it's going to get worse before it gets any better.

I guess you can either jump up and down about it or just wait your turn. At the moment I'm happy to wait my turn. I do know of a couple of blokes who think they're a cut above the rest of us and are behaving accordingly. Unfortunate, abusing the people who are processing these licences doesn't acheive a bloody thing.

Capt EFIS 15th Oct 2005 13:01

Even without all the background checks they mentioned that it could take up to 3-4 months before you receive the photo licence.

the wizard of auz 15th Oct 2005 17:15

I guess I'll just have to trundle about the sky without one until they show up. buggered if I'm going to give up work to make it convinient for their knee jerk reaction rule change. :rolleyes:

pall 17th Oct 2005 08:15

THE DEVIL IN THE DETAIL!
 
The really frustrating part is that my PHOTO LICENCE means nothing when it comes to flying in to a number of security listed airports. At such airports I must pay big bucks for an ASIC card over and above my PHOTO LICENCE. This is despite the fact that I have alalready been fully security and identity checked to get my current PHOTO LICENCE!!

virgindriver 17th Oct 2005 09:10

I still haven't got mine and I applied dec last year!

the wizard of auz 17th Oct 2005 11:45

And lets face it. Is it going to stop one single potential terrorist?. I doubt it. I wanna know why after thirteen years of flying with a valid licence, I suddenly have to have a security and identification check?. I could be a sleeper agent or something, just waiting to slam my 172 or 310 into ........well, into,............ sh1t.........theres nothing out here to hit. I know, i'll fly into the big smoke and................well, actually, theres nothing there I could worry much either. Now a roadtrain of fuel or a roadtrain of explosive stuff that I have access to quite readily, without any form of security drama.......well........I doubt I could do alot thats going to change the world with that either.
Wake up you pollies!!!!. theres bugger all over in this part of the world that is going to be earth shattering by being blown up or crashed into. none of the bad guys could give a fat rats crack about most of australia, and those that may have a desire to crash and burn stuff will find a way despite all the crap your forcing the decent law abiding (well, until now) folk to go through, as well as stumbeling onto a nice little earner.
I think the aviaton community has a lot to answer for, for not standing up and saying something about these totally ineffectual, unnecessary, knee jerk reaction rules, before they became laws.

CHAIRMAN 17th Oct 2005 14:46

I complained to Warren Truss and received a typical nonsensical reply that they are looking into the problem and may have a resolution shortly.
Quote -'The background checking for an ASIC is more rigorous than that required to obtain a photographic pilot licence' !!!!
Those damn pilots can stay on the airside of the fence without an ASIC, because they won't be trusted to get back on the tarmac with just a photo pilot's licence. Oh no indeed.
Typical bureaucratic sense.

dude65 17th Oct 2005 23:01

And this from CASA's website

"After 31 December 2005, if you want to operate an aircraft in Australian Territory and you need to hold a licence issued by CASA you must have a current aviation security check status. That means you must undergo an aviation security status check or hold a current ASIC".

It's not hard to tell what's going to happen next.

It'll be backflips at 20 paces by the government or else some pilots won't be able to work after Dec 31. All this so the government can make sure the hot dog vendors at the Commonwealth Games aren't a security risk.

heat 18th Oct 2005 02:22

Mine took 6 months don't bother calling it will arrive!

airway_manual 18th Oct 2005 03:27

I have got the photo portion back, but I'm still waiting for the ATPL which I applied for at the same time.....I agree with a previous post "not very professional".

Trav737-400 3rd Nov 2005 02:53

New fees
 
Hi, I sent my application in mid October for the photo licence and aviation security status check, with the understanding that it was free of charge. Today i received a CASA application form for the same check stating that it now costs $145 for the same check (AVID). I am going to have to re-apply and pay?. Anyone else in the same boat?.

Regards Trav737-400

dude65 3rd Nov 2005 03:52

Yep

Sent mine in early September and received the new forms today.
No luck yet in getting through to the licencing section at CASA.

I think it could be a very big boat

Ultralights 3rd Nov 2005 05:30

dont worry, your not alone, im there, filled out those bloody forms 3 times, still no licence! aparently my information was "missplaced"

Lasiorhinus 3rd Nov 2005 06:42

Applied early February, recieved licence mid October.

If they send you something asking for money after your original application, throw that straight in the bin. They cant retrospectively charge for something that was free when you entered into your contract with them.... but that doesnt mean they wont try, because some people will pay.

dude65 3rd Nov 2005 06:58

Did anyone get through to CASA today and find out whether or not these forms need to be resubmitted?

kiki 3rd Nov 2005 12:27

rang CASA yesterday askin them what the cut off was for free licences she said 1st nov, then she said if i hold an ASIC there was no need for a photo licence, what the


F*** the photo licence off, i say

farrari 3rd Nov 2005 22:06

I sent my application for photo licence in around september on form showing NO FEES> I spoke to them today and since I have already sent mine in, NO FEES are due, and I do not have to re send forms. I asked them to re check this with someone else and they got the same answer,so If you have already sent in forms then no fees payable for 2 years and no redoing forms for 2 years.

Trav737-400 4th Nov 2005 00:30

Well thats a relief:)

kev_laline 4th Nov 2005 01:20

I have a flight crew license with my photo on it.

I have an Aviation Identity card, AVID, also with my photo on it, and it's waterproof.

Both of these took several months to acquire, after the appropriate info was supplied, including a police clearance.

CASA has just informed me that I now require an

AVIATION SECURITY IDENTIFICATION CARD ASIC

and they are sending an info pack to 35000 other pilots.

There is no security check required for the ASIC, because they checked when they gave me the AVID.

The fee for the ASIC is $95, but would have been $145 if the security check had been required.

It is an offence to not display the ASIC whilst in a SECURE AREA.

A person may be fined up to $550 every time they fail to display a valid ASIC.

We have to have an ASIC by 31 Dec 2005.

Howard Hughes 4th Nov 2005 05:58

Is it just me, or is the new form totally ambiguous, with no clear direction of what is required? Especially for people with professional licences and an ASIC!!

I still had the old form 639 and sent that off!! I sent it registered mail, so I have proof that they received it. I can just see it now "sorry Mr hughes we seem to have lost your details, you won't be able to fly on New Years Day!" "Oh good, well then I'll just have to have a big sleep in instead".....

I pity those people who have grey/standby days on 1st January 2006.

Cheers, HH.

:ok:

farrari 4th Nov 2005 08:20

Kev_laline, Asic card is
only required for those who go into airports listed as Secuurity Controlled Airports with RPT, such as Albury or Bathurst. If you fly into say Bankstown or Wollongong you do not need an Asic only Photo and Avid. The whole thing is bull#hit and just an other waste of our time and money to feather their nests. All this constant change has destoyed GA in Australia, what a WANK

185skywagon 4th Nov 2005 08:56

farrari
check your ERSA. Bankstown and Archerfield are security controlled airports. Wollongong probably is too, if it has a Qantas link service.
cheers,
185.

JetRacer 4th Nov 2005 10:51

Spoke to a lady at CASA Flight crew Licenceing section today, she said ......

Photo Licences are NOT compulsory.

All you need to have if accessing a security controlled airport is an ASIC.

It is the ASIC which is required after 31 December not a photographic licence.

The fees she said were for the issuing of the ASIC and the background checks required, no fees for a photo licence.

Hope this helps, as that package CASA sent out f#$%@*& confused me!


JetRacer

impulse coupled 4th Nov 2005 21:38

Guys

Facts help, not opinions.

You can find out if your airport is security controlled here:

http://www.dotars.gov.au/transsec/av...operators.aspx

Bankstown does NOT require an ASIC.

More info on

www.aopa.com.au

185skywagon 4th Nov 2005 22:29

impulse coupled
i think you'll find that means that Bankstown will not be issuing ASICS.
however, i stand to be corrected.
185

parkland 4th Nov 2005 23:23

Just checked Bankstown - it is security controlled. Therefore you need an ASIC.

Are people still having problems getting through to CASA on the telephone?

I mean 1300 737 032, not the wrong number they sent out. Is ther any explanation of how they will get through thousands of ASIC applcations between now and Christmas?

kev_laline 5th Nov 2005 01:04

CASA sent me an ASIC Q & A sheet

It lists 39 NSW airports including Norfolk & Lord Howe, which are Security Controlled Airports with RPT ops.

It also lists

Bankstown
Belmont
Glen Innes

as Security Controlled without RPT ops


"CASA is an issuing body for the purpose of issuing ASICs to pilots"

so you can probably get an ASIC at Bankstown

UnderneathTheRadar 5th Nov 2005 01:11

Jetracer
 
Jetracer

Please don't believe a word you were told by CASA - either you or they have it the wrong way around.

By 1 January - you MUST have an AVID. The process for applying for this means that you will also be issued with a Photo ID - so I guess she was technically correct but only very technically. If you had a photo id from before March 05 then you won't have an AVID.

By 1 January - you MUST have and DISPLAY an ASIC if you are airside at a SECURITY CONTROLLED AERODROME.

The AVID process includes a police check but not an immigration status check. The issuing of a AVID will also include giving you a photo license.

If you then decide you need an ASIC, you then need both a police check and an immigration check. However, CASA are offering an exemption from the police check if you have an AVID completed after March 2005. It is in this scenario only that you get the $95 ASIC (because apparently it costs this much to print a plastic card and check that you're a legal resident).

Therefore, if you haven't done anything else yet - you must decide if you want an AVID or an ASIC and apply for one pronto.

HTH.


Impulse coupled - before lecturing on facts - make sure you read your reference material before presenting inaccuracies as facts! Every airport on the DOTARS page need an ASIC - the yes/no column tells you if the airport operator can/will issue one.

parkland 5th Nov 2005 01:24

UnderneathTheRadar

What you say is right but please note you dont' have to have BOTH an ASIC and an AVID.

Chose which one you need. If you ever visit a security controlled aerodrome you must have an ASIC by Dec 31. If you NEVER visit a security controlled aerodrome an AVID will sufice.

Either way everyone is supposed to be secutity checked by Dec 31. What I find hard to believe is that CASA, the AFP and ASIO can actually do this in the time available.

farrari 5th Nov 2005 05:59

You only need an Asic if you " access a secure area of a security controlled airport that has RPT operations" BK does not and Wol is not shown on their sheet, which they sent us, however this means you can fly into say Bathurst which is on the list, with out an Asic,as long as you do not go in areas as outlined in the sheet sent to us under the heading of "What is a secure area of a security controled airport" What A F WANK. What is the definition of the Movement Area.?


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.