Aus ATPL to NZ ATPL.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U.K.
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's the link to the New Zealand civil aviation Authority's web site. Directly to your answer:
http://www.caa.govt.nz/pilots/For_Australian_pilots.htm
http://www.caa.govt.nz/pilots/For_Australian_pilots.htm
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: All over
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you.
TogaLock .... This is exactly what I am after ! THANKYOU.
slice...Yes. An ASIAN Carrier wants me to have my NZ ATPL before I start training their pilots.I know not why?
CHEERS.
slice...Yes. An ASIAN Carrier wants me to have my NZ ATPL before I start training their pilots.I know not why?
CHEERS.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Camden, NSW, Australia
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have a look at http://www.casa.gov.au/avreg/fcl_lic/download/ttmra.PDF
Props are for boats!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chocks Away?
Australias still isnt? Are you 100% sure?
AUSTRALIA is definitely one of the 188 Contracting States.
Look here
http://www.icao.int/icao/en/aimstext...tandardization
From the ICAO site.......
http://www.icao.int/icao/en/trivia/peltrg.htm
I am pretty satisfied it is, I have 4 ICAO licences myself
US,OZ,NZ,and JAMIACAN
Regards
Sheep
Australias still isnt? Are you 100% sure?
AUSTRALIA is definitely one of the 188 Contracting States.
Look here
http://www.icao.int/icao/en/aimstext...tandardization
ICAO does not issue any licences. Licences issued by ICAO Contracting States on the basis of Standards and Recommended Practices of Annex 1 - Personnel Licensing, are habitually called ICAO licences. This has led many to believe that there is a specific ICAO or international licence. The fact is that there is not one single international licence issued by ICAO or any other organization. States issue their own licences based on national regulations in conformity with Annex 1 specifications and validate licences issued by other Contracting States on the basis of bilateral or multilateral agreements or the fulfilment of nationally legislated requirements.
http://www.icao.int/icao/en/trivia/peltrg.htm
I am pretty satisfied it is, I have 4 ICAO licences myself
US,OZ,NZ,and JAMIACAN
Regards
Sheep
Chocks Away
I think you may be getting confused with what is and isn’t an ICAO recognized license. Australia’s flight crew licenses have always been ICAO recognized. It has just been the lay out of them that has been in question. Up until last year Australian flight crew licenses were in a credit card format, which didn’t comply with ICAO recommendations for laying out an ICAO flight crew license. They are now in a book format, which does comply with ICAO recommendations.
I think you may be getting confused with what is and isn’t an ICAO recognized license. Australia’s flight crew licenses have always been ICAO recognized. It has just been the lay out of them that has been in question. Up until last year Australian flight crew licenses were in a credit card format, which didn’t comply with ICAO recommendations for laying out an ICAO flight crew license. They are now in a book format, which does comply with ICAO recommendations.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oz medicals require extra stuff for ICAO.
There is some bumpf sent out about it with renewals.
eg ICAO requires over forties to do medicals every six months, if memory serves.
There is some bumpf sent out about it with renewals.
eg ICAO requires over forties to do medicals every six months, if memory serves.
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Thanks, fellas.
I was aware Oz was a "contracting state" but had discrepencies, such as Currawongs' mention of medicals (airspace another).
My reasoning was that for a licence to be valid, the appropriate medical must accompany it. In our case the basic Oz class 1 medical requires more, to be "standardised" with ICAO medical reqs... and as such the "whole licence" wasn't ICAO complient.
Also, my comments hang over from many different forms of licence, had here in Oz over the years. 404 puts that one straight.
I was aware Oz was a "contracting state" but had discrepencies, such as Currawongs' mention of medicals (airspace another).
My reasoning was that for a licence to be valid, the appropriate medical must accompany it. In our case the basic Oz class 1 medical requires more, to be "standardised" with ICAO medical reqs... and as such the "whole licence" wasn't ICAO complient.
Also, my comments hang over from many different forms of licence, had here in Oz over the years. 404 puts that one straight.