Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

BE200 XHV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2024, 08:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Oz
Posts: 239
Received 175 Likes on 80 Posts
That stood out when I did a Heli rating. The amount of obstacles in the grassed areas.

Was a case in the states a long while ago with a twin returning due failure. They opted for the grass over the concrete, couldn’t see any obstacles on the approach, so they stuck with it, the only thing was during the flare all these hidden obstacles started appearing.
nomess is online now  
Old 13th May 2024, 08:42
  #22 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,206
Received 113 Likes on 73 Posts
Two threads on the mishap merged.
john_tullamarine is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 13th May 2024, 08:54
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,216
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by prickly
Yes they are. Robyn over at The Australian considers it a "miracle" landing and the pilot is a hero.

"Just doin my job maam"
To be fair, the journos don't pick the photos/vids that get inserted into their stories and they don't write the captions for same (that's where the "miraculous landing" tag appeared). As to "hero pilot", that would probably be roundly endorsed by the pax, at the very least, I would think.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 09:07
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 312
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Stationair8
Nice job.

ABC reporting the engines were powered down for landing. Is that something that CASA mandates these days?
There's an exception for carrier landings.
Pearly White is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 09:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,863
Received 54 Likes on 24 Posts
Channel 7 called it a ‘belly-up’ landing 🙄
Captain Dart is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 09:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 312
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Ex FSO GRIFFO
Question for those 'in the know'.......

In such a case, for both the aircraft and the outcome, is it better to land on the grass, less friction, = less damage(?), or the hard bitumen?
...on the grass would be 'softer' would it not?...
Having done lots of landings on grassed runways I can confirm that's a massive difference between a well-used grass runway and the "rough" grassed areas alongside it that hasn't seen traffic since the last time it got slashed. The grass is usually longer - sometimes much longer - and you can't see rabbit holes, swampy bits, drainage culverts, roos or even sheep sometimes. In peacetime I'd pick the hard stuff every time. The fact the surface was wet was an absolute bonus. I hope someone had a cup of tea ready for old mate who executed a textbook landing after putting another, what - 3.5 hours in the logs, burning off fuel?
Pearly White is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 09:39
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,815
Received 145 Likes on 71 Posts
burning off fuel?
Free turbine time in the logbook.

Honestly - just stick it on the ground for gawd's sake.
Checkboard is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Checkboard:
Old 13th May 2024, 10:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,087
Received 159 Likes on 70 Posts
Nice job done by the pilot

A good example of why you should always carry an alternate for single runway aerodromes. Anyone know how long they took to remove the airframe?
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 10:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,301
Received 171 Likes on 88 Posts
I’m surprised the Airforce allowed their runway to be blocked. With all that fuel they could have gone anywhere!
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 13th May 2024, 10:41
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SE Qld, Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 1,186
Received 49 Likes on 33 Posts
is it better to land on the grass,
Griffo, really straining the memory cells here but I'm sure that the Beech manual for both Baron and Bonanza recommended NOT landing gear up on the grass.
Dora-9 is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 10:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,559
Received 64 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
Nice job done by the pilot

A good example of why you should always carry an alternate for single runway aerodromes. Anyone know how long they took to remove the airframe?
In the last five years, two airports that I regularly operate into have had the sole or primary runway closed due to aircraft being disabled on or close to the pavement.
krismiler is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 12:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 615
Received 70 Likes on 29 Posts
From the Guardian:

”While the plane was in the air, Doug Drury, a professor of aviation at Central Queensland University, said the pilot would probably be in constant contact with maintenance teams troubleshooting the problem.

“My guess would be it’s not so much burning off fuel as it is trying to figure out what the problem is and if there is anything they can do to fix it prior to having put it on the ground,” Drury said as the plane was circling.

“If you’re landing without your landing gear you’re going to do quite a bit of damage to the engines as well as the belly of the aircraft. I would imagine they would also attempt to do a grass landing if possible, but with all the rain we’ve experienced lately that might make it difficult.”

However, Drury said if there were fire crews on the ground waiting “I’d imagine they could also put in on a runway”.

“They would be in contact with a maintenance team to go through as many trials as they can, like pull this circuit breaker, pull this switch, try this, try that,” he said.”

Perhaps someone could have a quiet word with the good professor…
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by itsnotthatbloodyhard:
Old 13th May 2024, 13:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Oz
Posts: 239
Received 175 Likes on 80 Posts
Originally Posted by itsnotthatbloodyhard
Perhaps someone could have a quiet word with the good professor…
’probably’…’my guess’…’would imagine’ …’might’….‘I’d imagine’

So basically he has no idea. The journalist doesn’t care, they got the ‘expert’ take, and enough comments to write some trashy article.
nomess is online now  
Old 13th May 2024, 22:42
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,409
Received 245 Likes on 114 Posts
And the poor fella in the back was hurling his heart out "uncontrollably", according to the pilot, during the hours of orbits. The man certainly looked a bit ordinary when he got out.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 22:56
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,900
Received 198 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by Dora-9
Griffo, really straining the memory cells here but I'm sure that the Beech manual for both Baron and Bonanza recommended NOT landing gear up on the grass.
Yep it’s well publicised that something will dig in and spin you around and even flip you over. Much smoother on the bitumen. Less chance of airframe stress on the bitumen as a result too as it’s not abruptly stopping and tearing off wings etc.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 13th May 2024, 23:24
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,103
Received 56 Likes on 24 Posts
Snoop

Thankyou 'Mr D-9',

Re the Barons etc., I have always wondered just what would happen when, that 'little' protruding step for cabin access actually makes contact.

Does it break off (by design) or does it 'dig in' and slew the aircraft around?

It does appear to be reasonably 'solid' and is certainly 'fixed'.......Could be it makes a fair bit of that 'noise'...?

Cheers
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 14th May 2024, 00:26
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,301
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
If you belly land on the grass the emergency services run the risk of running into a ditch whereas on the bitumen they have a clean run. This incident also puts paid to the common myth that disabled aircraft will simply be bulldozed off the runway to allow the airport to be used again.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 14th May 2024, 00:54
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 567
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by Ex FSO GRIFFO
Re the Barons etc., I have always wondered just what would happen when, that 'little' protruding step for cabin access actually makes contact.

Does it break off (by design) or does it 'dig in' and slew the aircraft around?

It does appear to be reasonably 'solid' and is certainly 'fixed'.......Could be it makes a fair bit of that 'noise'...?
Obviously it depends on the aircraft, but you might be quite surprised to find many aircraft designers actually account for belly-landings in their design. Since you don't really want a shower of sparks down the runway if you can avoid it, I suspect it either breaks off by design or somehow doesn't even touch.

eg. I'll admit to being extremely surprised to learn that loss of either main gear on a Piper Warrior (admittedly a trainer) results in minimal damage to the airframe itself due to the design of (a) the remaining struts which prevent the wing tips touching the runway and (b) a tail skid/tie-down to protect the tail section. Mr Piper certainly knew what he was doing!

PiperCameron is offline  
Old 14th May 2024, 01:09
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,087
Received 159 Likes on 70 Posts

In the last five years, two airports that I regularly operate into have had the sole or primary runway closed due to aircraft being disabled on or close to the pavement.

Yep I can think of 4 in the last 3 years nationwide where runways were closed with disabled aircraft. So it does happen. Three of those were single runway aerodromes.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 14th May 2024, 01:51
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 567
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
Yep I can think of 4 in the last 3 years nationwide where runways were closed with disabled aircraft. So it does happen. Three of those were single runway aerodromes.
Time to spare, go by air...
PiperCameron is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.