Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

C172 down near Camden - one fatality

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

C172 down near Camden - one fatality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Mar 2024, 07:41
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
I've raised the issue of pilots presuming the description "professional" before, and pointed out that the members of true professions do not engage in public criticism or public negative speculation about their colleagues. It brings the entire profession into disrepute because the members' opinions on the subject are perceived as having greater weight and authority. As I said earlier, there are already plenty of people out there ready and willing (and in some cases remunerated) to find fault in pilots. Their colleagues don't need to 'pile on'.
Because the members of "true professions" are such pillars of society. Professions such as lawyers I would imagine or accountants even. You profess such distaste of pilots piling on yet here you are posting day in day out. I imagine most professional pilots will learn to live with your disapproval. Training aircraft simply don't nose over and impact the ground at high descent rates with high power settings. If they did then they would be grounded immediately by the flying schools that operate them. You can come up with any number of possible combinations of airframe or engine failure which may have lead to that accident but the simple, albeit distressing, explanation that it was deliberate also fits the evidence.

If there is a mechanical fault then my apologies to the family will be unreserved. If the report states that it was not able to determine the cause of the accident then that will not bring closure for them either.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2024, 07:53
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Canberra ACT Australia
Posts: 720
Received 245 Likes on 124 Posts
Can you quote a post in which I've criticised the operational judgements of any pilot? I post here "day in day out", so you should be able to grab some low hanging fruit.

I don't have a "distaste for pilots" in principle. I'm on their side. I just despair at the fact that they're their own worst enemies.

And you'll hang your hat on what the ATSB report says? Hmmm.
If the report states that it was not able to determine the cause of the accident then that will not bring closure for [the family] either.
Indeed.

Especially when 'professional' pilots have been speculating in the way you and others have.
Clinton McKenzie is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2024, 08:14
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Lookleft
You can come up with any number of possible combinations of airframe or engine failure which may have lead to that accident but the simple, albeit distressing, explanation that it was deliberate also fits the evidence.
I think everybody here knows this, but out of respect for all those involved I don't think it's really appropriate to discuss it, much less make the assertion that it is the most likely scenario.

Without any additional information forthcoming, I think best we wait for the outcome of the investigation.
jonas64 is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by jonas64:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.