PPL and controlled airspace
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PPL and controlled airspace
Can anyone point out to the relevant regulations that a PPL holder is allowed into controlled airspace? I heard a conflicting account this morning that PPLs used to have restrictions but no longer do. I'd like to trace that back to the regs. Thanks!
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
61.495 related to the RPL, not to the PPL. There's a controlled airspace endorsement for the RPL.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KRviator
CASR 61.427 2(b) and 4(b)ii
What about new PPL holders?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara
61.427 applies to licence holders granted on the basis of 202.272 and 202.274, ie. "old authorisations".
What about new PPL holders?
What about new PPL holders?
Don't we make things so simple, clear and straightforward in Australia??
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: YMML
Age: 41
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara
61.427 applies to licence holders granted on the basis of 202.272 and 202.274, ie. "old authorisations".
What about new PPL holders?
What about new PPL holders?
Regulations aside, there are no restrictions for a PPL, so nothing to stop you landing your A380 at Tullamarine. If there were restrictions the L39 PPL owners club would be complaining loudly.
Last edited by Squawk7700; 6th Nov 2018 at 22:19.
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: gapuwiyak
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Part 61 licencing is easy to understand amongst the numerous fact sheets, pages on CASA's website and the regulations themselves. The only problem here are silly questions being asked...
For a period of time the holder of a PPL was required to be trained and endorsed for various types of airspace (I cannot recall exactly, but certainly 1990s at least early 2000s when I was doing PPL flight tests) Under the ICAO guidelines a PPL holder can fly in controlled airspace, so CASA dropped the airspace limitations to harmonise with ICAO. Under the transitional arrangements from CAR 5 to CASR Part 61 all PPL holders were considered to be trained and competent to operate in controlled airspace. As stated earlier, Part 61 requires training in all types of airspace (may be simulated if not practical to operate in it due to remoteness of training location).
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In conclusion, flying in controlled airspace seems to be one surprising exception in a field where you've come to accept that an activity is forbidden unless you've received a formal authorisation to carry it out (e.g. endorsement X or Y).
Originally Posted by Okihara
In conclusion, flying in controlled airspace seems to be one surprising exception in a field where you've come to accept that an activity is forbidden unless you've received a formal authorisation to carry it out (e.g. endorsement X or Y).
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bloodandiron
Part 61 licencing is easy to understand amongst the numerous fact sheets, pages on CASA's website and the regulations themselves. The only problem here are silly questions being asked...
What's your day job? Comedian?
Tootle pip!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
