Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Newly minted PPL out of Archerfield

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Newly minted PPL out of Archerfield

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2017, 09:48
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spode
OP, you have had the same whinge on 3 different sites now I think. How did you get all the way to PPL without figuring this out already?
Small world, eh. I guess, given your rhetoric, you believe there's no point asking in different communities to gather a wide variety of information/opinions. I'm sorry if doing that offended you.

I will note that I have couched things slightly differently in each occasion. But sure, if you think what I'm trying to do is petulant, then slight variations on a theme won't change that point of view.

Another point is that the only entity who would consider renting a plane to our "newly-minted PPL" holder with nil hours on his licence, is the flying school he got it from at Archerfield.
Indeed, that's almost certainly the first point of call and probably where I'll be for a while. But why do the 75 odd hours I have to this point not count? I've not heard that one before.
aplund is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 12:46
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My experience was quite different in terms of private hire with a fresh PPL.

I with a bit under 60 hrs I went to Redcliffe and did a hour dual in a 172 (hadn't flown one prior) and they were happy for me to hire it after that.

On my return to Adelaide I did 3 circuits in a 172 with one of the flying schools at PF and was then good to go.

Admittedly that was 10yrs ago so I'm not sure if the landscape has changed since then...
bw2004 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 20:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Admittedly that was 10yrs ago so I'm not sure if the landscape has changed since then...
I don't think it has bw, I know of several 172's that can be hired by unknown 60 hour pilots with nothing more than a check flight.

Another point is that the only entity who would consider renting a plane to our "newly-minted PPL" holder with nil hours on his licence, is the flying school he got it from at Archerfield.
Is actually not true.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 22:24
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OP, if you were willing to do the flying at Redcliffe, I know somewhere you could go where the prices are quite reasonable and the people there are nice and friendly, it's as close to a club atmosphere as you can get. PM me if you want more details.

As to your questions about RA AUS, it is indeed a 5 hour conversion course, however I wouldn't consider it converting backwards, some of the RA aircraft can be a bit of a handful to fly, you have less momentum and they don't have some of the handy design features that reduce things like adverse yaw. Plus when your aircraft only weighs 600kg any crosswind present will be felt. They are great for developing your basic flying skills. Also of the 5 hours conversion only 1 hour has to be dual. All your PPL qualifications will be recognised, however RA AUS doesn't have a CTA endorsement, so the way you get around that is by using your PPL priveleges for the CTA access. It counts for your 3 takeoff and landings. As for a AFR, if you were smart you would avoid doing one of them for the foreseeable future by adding another rating, like csu etc instead of the BFR. And passing a casa test will renew your RA AUS BFR as well.
Ia8825 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 23:44
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ia8825
OP, if you were willing to do the flying at Redcliffe, I know somewhere you could go where the prices are quite reasonable and the people there are nice and friendly, it's as close to a club atmosphere as you can get. PM me if you want more details.
Thanks for that info. Really helpful. I'm quite open to all possibilities. I cannot PM you as I'm unable to receive an activation email for some reason. I'll see if I can contact the admin.
aplund is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 00:42
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ia8825
OP, if you were willing to do the flying at Redcliffe, I know somewhere you could go where the prices are quite reasonable and the people there are nice and friendly, it's as close to a club atmosphere as you can get. PM me if you want more details.

As to your questions about RA AUS, it is indeed a 5 hour conversion course, however I wouldn't consider it converting backwards, some of the RA aircraft can be a bit of a handful to fly, you have less momentum and they don't have some of the handy design features that reduce things like adverse yaw. Plus when your aircraft only weighs 600kg any crosswind present will be felt. They are great for developing your basic flying skills. Also of the 5 hours conversion only 1 hour has to be dual. All your PPL qualifications will be recognised, however RA AUS doesn't have a CTA endorsement, so the way you get around that is by using your PPL priveleges for the CTA access. It counts for your 3 takeoff and landings. As for a AFR, if you were smart you would avoid doing one of them for the foreseeable future by adding another rating, like csu etc instead of the BFR. And passing a casa test will renew your RA AUS BFR as well.


I agree with your comments regarding LSA being more difficult ti fly than Your typical GA PA38s, C172s.

I'm interested in your info on GA at YRED.

PM me the details if you would.
Acrosport II is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 00:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 109
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Is actually not true.
Maybe, but probably not at Archerfield. Certainly my insurer would be most upset.

It would still save him $300+ for the check-ride by sticking with the flying school who gave him the PPL. I am sure he would also receive some valuable informal advice from his previous instructors who took an interest in him and know his skills. A review of his first few flight plans would be worthwhile as well.

All of this add-on service for just sticking with the people he was with.

Last edited by Possum1; 19th Mar 2017 at 00:59.
Possum1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.