Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Gate to bay: pilot required?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2016, 16:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gate to bay: pilot required?

Saw an SQ A330 power down at a remote bay at Mascot the other day - instead of being tugged there. My questions: (a) how often does the crew 'drive' the aircraft from the gate to the bay; and (b) when tugged, who is onboard?
juliusg is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 22:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
from memory, many years ago, some LAMES had license to Taxi. not even sure they can do engine runs these days.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 03:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,993
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
a/ Almost never, Engineers tow the Jets as required.
b/ Driver in the Tug ( obviously !! ) and an approved person in the cockpit on the brakes if required in an emergency to stop the Jet.

Sunfish:----you must be joking surely? Of course they can do Engine runs!!

Engine runs with pax or crew on board require the CN to sit in a control seat.( not to run the Op but to look after any EVAC situation as it occurs )
If the ginger beers need to do an Engine run ( and they do often ) with no crew or pax on board then they obviously don't need a crew member present as they are big boys ( or girls ) and can do it on their own quite well

Last edited by ACMS; 10th Jul 2016 at 03:26.
ACMS is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2016, 06:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
thank. you for the update ACMS, in my day LAMES indeed did engine runs ,however with the nanny state OH&S these days I wasn't sure if they were still allowed.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 05:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Generally: -

Flight Deck operator
PIC - Person in Charge
Tug operator
Taxi Endorsement
Aircraft Marshaller


All of the above are company approvals that any LAME/AME can and do hold. There are a number of pre-requisites for each.

Taxi movements must have minimum x 2 approved LAMEs on the flight deck.

Tow approvals must utilize 1 of each of the above. No taxi endorsement required. PIC runs the whole show. Marhalling as required.

No requirement for flight crew for any engine runs unless you need a seat filled.

Aviater is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 08:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,993
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Sorry but if pax or crew are on board then the CN or designate must occupy a control seat.
ACMS is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 10:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,562
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
CAR 229 allows engos to taxi:

229 Aircraft not to be taxied except by pilot
(1) A person must not taxi an aircraft anywhere on an aerodrome if the person is not either a licensed pilot whose licence is endorsed for the particular type of aircraft concerned or a person approved by CASA in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the approval.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 04:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry but if pax or crew are on board then the CN or designate must occupy a control seat.
Can you quote the legislation behind that?
Aviater is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 06:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sydney
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Capitan Bloggs,

I think that CAR 229 has been revised in recent times because the rule when it was written as you quoted had a major problem. It was an offence to taxi an aircraft on an aerodrome if you were not a pilot or an engo who had a taxi approval, but taxi it down an ALA and all was good....
no_one is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 09:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,562
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
No one, yes, it has. My boo boo. Same principle though. Part 64 mentions "aerodrome" though. Is an ALA an aerodrome?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 12:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,993
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Aviator----Yes my Ops manual.

I don't care what yours says, if you can trust an Engineer to look after your 300 pax if it all goes pear shaped then go for it....
ACMS is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 06:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviator----Yes my Ops manual.
That's what I thought. Your manuals may require this and others may not. Whilst everybody's procedures and manuals vary, the basic rules will almost always apply, as suggested in my original post.
Aviater is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 07:25
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 170 Likes on 87 Posts
Passengers Onboard?

So if it does go pear shaped, who is going to order an evacuation of the passengers in the absence of the flight crew?
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 09:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,993
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Exactly why, common sense and my employers Ops manual says I have to be present in a control seat during Engine runs with Pax on board.....it says if possible I should conduct these Engine runs.....
ACMS is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2016, 09:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: home
Posts: 518
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Happy to be corrected but I've never heard of engineers being allowed to taxi a jet
airdualbleedfault is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2016, 09:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,522
Received 206 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by airdualbleedfault
Happy to be corrected but I've never heard of engineers being allowed to taxi a jet
It used to be common practice but nowadays, insurance companies get a bit nervous and its also expensive to ensure that a LAME retains taxi currency on type. To be honest I would rather not have the responsibility unless i'm going to get paid extra for it.
TURIN is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.