Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Aircraft Hire Recomendations for Long trip.

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Aircraft Hire Recomendations for Long trip.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Mar 2016, 00:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Aircraft Hire Recomendations for Long trip.

Hi,

Im not far away from getting my PPL (on the way to CPL), and i want to surprise some family by flying down to visit them.

Plan was to fly from Archerfield to Dubbo (stay overnight), then to Port Pirie.
Then fly back in the reverse order.

Im researching the best aircraft to hire for this run.
A high cruise speed would be great (less engine & flight time), but its got to balance with the hire costs.

The Cessna 182 turbo RG have a nice cruise speed of about 180 (if anyone actually hires them out), but I would like to hear from you more experienced pilots what you would recommend.

I was consider hiring directly from an aircraft owner, but thought first i would work out which aircraft would be most suitable & affordable. Then try an negotiate a deal with an owner.

Look forward to your replies.
KyleTheAviator is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 17:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The turbo RG is a rare bird, you are more likely to find a 210.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 17:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: go west
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think any sane person/organization will let a fresh PPL'er to head off with their beloved turbo/complex beast whatever it might be. Even if the owner may have full confidence in you, the insurance company might think otherwise.

If you're working towards CPL, why not just do it in a regular spam can and let your hours build, you're going to need them anyway.
Martin_123 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 22:04
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I haven't found anyone hiring them out. 210 is a good suggestion thanks. I found someone online quoting $345 per hour, is that a good rate for a 210? (was older post, prices may have gone up).

I have been wondering how insurance would work. It would be kinda od though if insurance wouldnt cover.. I will be legally licensed to fly anywhere in australia solo, and demonstrated competence via completing training.

I could wait and do it as part of my CPL hour building, but would really love to do it sooner. Kind of as a celebration of getting my PPL, and upcoming plans to visit family.
KyleTheAviator is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 01:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Insurance policies for more complex aircraft usually have a minimum hours and training clause so the owner would not be covered if he rented it out to someone with less.
It was many years ago but when I rented a 210 in SA I was 2 hours short of the minimum so I had to take a 172 out for 2 1/2 hours to qualify before the CFI would take me out for a check ride. The fact that I already had hours on another 210 from the same club was irrelevant. The nice shiny new one had stricter insurance and I needed a 6 seater.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 04:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that an owner hiring to a new ppl is pretty unlikely. You're more likely to get a PA28 or C172 from a flying school, maybe even where you learnt. Having said that, as you are planning Brisbane to Port Pirie, why not post this in the Pacific GA forum? You'd get answers from Australia rather than the other side of the world. Who knows, you may even get a lead on an aircraft.

As for the trip, why go back the same way? The outback looks much the same in each direction. Think of returning via Broken Hill, Cobar, Coffs Harbour, 500' coastal, Gold Coast, Q1 then Archerfield? That way you will include Class D and Class C control zones. You may even get some practice with restricted areas around Evans Head. All good if you're planning on CPL.

Last edited by fujii; 16th Mar 2016 at 05:18.
fujii is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2016, 07:36
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Insurance policies for more complex aircraft usually have a minimum hours and training clause so the owner would not be covered if he rented it out to someone with less.
Thanks for the explanation. That makes sense.

You're more likely to get a PA28 or C172 from a flying school, maybe even where you learnt.
Yeah, my flight school is an option. But i think they would want the plane back ASAP. Where a private owner may be happy if i spend a few days with family not flying, before returning.

Having said that, as you are planning Brisbane to Port Pirie, why not post this in the Pacific GA forum?
Thanks for the suggestion. Im not familiar with the this forum yet. At this stage im just researching which plane would be best/cost efficient for the trip.

As for the trip, why go back the same way?
Haha well, the way back is going to be a freight run. from YPIR to YSDU (bringing something back from one family member, to the other). But i like your suggestion for the rest of the trip back from YSDU to YBAF, cut across to Coffs Harbour then up to Goldy then Brisbane. Thanks
KyleTheAviator is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 11:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Next door to the wrong neighbours
Posts: 243
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suggest you hire the same type as you have done your PPL hrs build in. Familiarity on a long flight is an important safety factor.
Besides, the faster you fly the less time you have to work out why things aint going the way you had planned them. Stick to what you know and you won;t go too wrong.
truthinbeer is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 13:33
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suggest you hire the same type as you have done your PPL hrs build in
Your logic is sound, but that would be one long slow boring trip in a 172. I like the idea of getting some experience in something else. Of course i will have to spend a few extra dollars for training to get checked off to fly.

I've actually been reading up on some of the kit planes like the RV-7. Nice and fast, fuel efficient, could be a winner (if i can find any to hire in brisbane).

What do you guys think about a RV-7 for the trip? Or something equivalent, suggestions?
KyleTheAviator is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 21:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are going to need the hours for CPL anyway, so why rush. Plan a couple of challenging legs to continue improving you navigation technique. Go to some aerodromes that you may not otherwise get a chance to see.
Stretch06 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 21:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not look at a 206?

They're not fast, but as mentioned if you're building command time then why rush?

No retract so you'll find insurance it easier to get, and if you can fit it through the door it'll probably take off with it (legally!). 200 series time will help you immensely when it comes to getting your first job! (Unless of course you plan on just becoming a flight instructor...)

There used to be a guy in Gympie that would hire his 206 out and would often just tag along on trips to if insurance was an issue. You log the time and he has something to do in retirement. Win/Win!
iPahlot is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 22:37
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not look at a 206?
Thanks, the 206 is definitely is good one for my career. Makes it hard to say no.. but with only a marginally higher cruise than a 172, makes it hard to justify the hourly rate. $279 (124 knot cruise) Vs c206 for $391 (142 knot cruise) (TACHO pricing Redcliffe aero club)

Pice doesnt match the performance IMO. Ive seen Cirrus S22 rates cheaper then their c206

If i can find some better pricing, i'd be keen.
KyleTheAviator is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 22:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Down there
Posts: 315
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Mooney or Bonanza
Jenna Talia is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2016, 23:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you on a 150hr course, or a 200 hr course?

If it's a 200hr course, get the absolute cheapest thing you can find, and hour build with it. I've been flying a 152 around because hours is hours.

For a 150hr course, ask one of your instructors if you can make this a solo navex, and take what they suggest.
outlandishoutlanding is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2016, 00:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I'd look a Cirrus. Not complex and fast(ish). But you will need to do conversion training. Given your hours you'd be looking at SR20 which has about the same speed as a C182.

The other options is a 172RG. Easy to be checked out on (assuming your training on a 172). (I have the impression it is just you so payload is not an issue.)

In terms of spending time at the destination, I have always worked on 2hrs flying per day away keeps the owner happy.
Flying Ted is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2016, 00:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mt Druitt
Posts: 173
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hours

Get the hours... C150/2
snoop doggy dog is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2016, 02:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Next door to the wrong neighbours
Posts: 243
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the hang-up with a/c speed which really will not make much difference, especially once you take into account t/o, landing, having a burger etc. The ETA difference is basically the time taken to drink another cup of coffee at Dubbo.
To put it into perspective. Let's assume you have the fuel and bladder capacity to fly YBAF-YPIR in one hit for a hare and tortoise exercise.
Distance = 976 NM
C206 - At 142kt, flight time = 5.58hrs
C172 - At 124kt, flight time = 6.5hrs
At 110kt, flight time = 7.43hrs

I would think a little extra time to rest and refresh at each stop will improve your safety factor. In that case there is really little difference to your ETA regardless of a/c.
truthinbeer is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2016, 03:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would go for a 182, or 206, but if your only flying yourself, aim for a 182.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2016, 03:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,878
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
For the Gen Y's it's all about going fast.

Unless you're flying around the world or perhaps Australia, the extra speed for the cost may not be anywhere near worth it.

Not many companies out there or private persons for that matter would let a fresh low hour PPL at the controls of their 206 let alone 210.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2016, 08:01
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can you drop me a PM? It won't let me send you one. I know guy who might be able to help you.
Cheers mate. Unfortunately i cant PM either (maybe because my account is new?). I have contacted a mod, hopefully they can sort it out. Look forward to chatting then

C206 - At 142kt, flight time = 5.58hrs
C172 - At 124kt, flight time = 6.5hrs
At 110kt, flight time = 7.43hrs

In that case there is really little difference to your ETA regardless of a/c.
Completely agree in that scenario. But if it was possible to find something with 180kt cruise under $400, like an RV-7, then i think it could be worth it. maybe thats fantasy land tho.

But as some members have made me realise. Maybe this should be more about whats best for my career.

They're not fast, but as mentioned if you're building command time then why rush?
Get the hours... C150/2
Very valid points. Will consider it. Im not sure what employers value more. Higher hours in a small aircraft. Or Less hours in an aircraft that is part of their fleet.

For a 150hr course, ask one of your instructors if you can make this a solo navex, and take what they suggest.
Great suggestion. I will definitely talk to them about it. I'll only be early stages CPL for when i was planning to do this trip, so maybe it wont fit training schedule..

For the Gen Y's it's all about going fast.
Haha i wont deny it. I feel the need... The need for SPEED. Now what are F-14 Tomcats going for wet?

So to summarize the options:
150/2 (go slow build hours)
172 or PA28 (middle ground)
182 (more speed an power)
206 (good for future jobs little faster)
210 (good for jobs and fast)
RV-7 (or equivalent light fast kit plane)

Mooney or Bonanza (im not familiar with, apart form the Mooney has long range. not sure on pricing or practicality for work)

Last edited by KyleTheAviator; 18th Mar 2016 at 13:17.
KyleTheAviator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.