Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Do YOU always fully check your controls before flight?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Do YOU always fully check your controls before flight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Apr 2015, 12:19
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Classified
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..........

Last edited by Radix; 18th Mar 2016 at 01:32.
Radix is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2015, 13:08
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radix

Yes I check the controls before each and every t/o.

I am always supisious of an aircraft just out of maintenance, any maintenance. Like it or not you are a test pilot when you conduct the first attempt to get airborne, after engineers have been at it. All due respect to our engineering colleagues of course.

I did raise the subject of my suspicions to an engineer once. He respond in hast "I am always suspicious of an aircraft when a pilot has been near it!!
SGTpilot2015 is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2015, 14:50
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond NSW
Posts: 1,345
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Ah yes, Aussie Bob. But that is why all of us are still alive.
gerry111 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 00:48
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Lots of good little Vegemite kids on this thread. No mistakes ever made, all checks always completed, restores my faith in aviation
Yeah, those goody goodies who are diligent with checks, talk about a bunch of losers!
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 01:34
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Allow me to elaborate slightly ....

There probably exists on this very thread, someone who has neglected this check and is unaware of it. All it takes is a distraction at a critical point. Just ask anyone who has landed "wheels up". The problem is that if this happens the belief that the check was completed remains.

Some may be better off saying: "There but for the grace of god go I"
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 02:37
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand your point Bob and, of course, it's possible to stuff anything up. But surely before-takeoff checks are the ones we do with the least pressure and with a high probability of getting correct. Is the small chance of a stuff-up really grounds for panning the righteous, even given the irrationality of an anonymous internet forum?

Invoking grace in an aviation context is a slippery slope. In the limit, you'd chuck away the check lists and say a prayer or two. Call me a heathen atheist but I have a suspicion this might not work so well.

I observe pilots who do next to no checks. If they crash and I don't, do I ascribe my longevity to grace? No, I think I'll go with the simplest explanation and just say I identified a few gotchas and had them fixed, reducing the probability of misfortune. If I crash, I accept that the probability of a crash is not zero, even with the best checks in the world.
tecman is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 03:20
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Invoking grace in an aviation context is a slippery slope. In the limit, you'd chuck away the check lists and say a prayer or two. Call me a heathen atheist but I have a suspicion this might not work so well.
I agree, I am not a particularly religious person, perhaps I would be better to simply say read "Fate is the Hunter" by Ernie Gahn.

I have long lost count of the number of BFR/AFR's I have conducted and my observations from some are the only reason the crash doesn't happen is because nothing ever goes wrong.

I do also recall an incident long ago when flying skydivers in a 182. I was totally destracted mid way through the pre take off checks by a lengthy ATC clearance. When I tried to rotate I then noticed that the nail the operator was using for the column lock was still firmly in place. Fortunately it was a long runway. Did I learn? Sure did, I am of the same opinion as others on this thread that this check should be done twice, once in the pre take off checks and once just as the aircraft is rolling.

The point is, had the nail been removed, to this day I would remain convinced that the control check had indeed been done. Needless to say the nail got discarded and the operator purchased the correct item. An alarm bell also rings when someone tells me they never forget a check.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 08:51
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sky Heaven
Age: 33
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tecman, I think that what Aussie Bob and a couple of others are trying to say is that the OP was posing a rhetorical question, not a poll on how many of the wonderfully diligent and professional internet forum members actually carry out a check, where, how, their fond memories of being taught by WW2 bomber veterans all sprinkled on top with some cute juxtapositions from real life airline pilots posted just to highlight the fact that they really are...... real life airline pilots!

It's all very cute (is there a group hug emoticon?)

Last edited by Compylot; 12th Apr 2015 at 09:52.
Compylot is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 10:04
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point is, had the nail been removed, to this day I would remain convinced that the control check had indeed been done.
Nice one Aussie Bob. A good reminder of the humility required to be a good pilot.

Oktas "I've never forgotten - or have I?" 8
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 10:18
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Classified
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..........

Last edited by Radix; 18th Mar 2016 at 01:32.
Radix is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 10:52
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sky Heaven
Age: 33
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think I love you Radix.
Compylot is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 11:07
  #52 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,878
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Certainly a first for any thread that I have ever started !!
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 11:15
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sky Heaven
Age: 33
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I love you too squawk7700.
Compylot is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 11:52
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Don't you just love school holidays !!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 12:19
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
We actually have had training to verify elevator around 80 knots and that it is moving properly and effectively.
Is that the manufacturer's recommendation in the FCOM or a local chief pilot saying it is a good idea in his humble (?)opinion. May as well give each trim control a bit of a twirl at 80 knots - after all they could be working in reverse
Centaurus is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2015, 12:22
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Ernie Gahn.
Actually I think his surname is Gann
Centaurus is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 16:33
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Earnest K, to be precise.

Heard a rather good recount of a rather senior instructor and airline pilot who walked back into the flight office with a hat full of the previous nights efforts (plus brekkie) at the mess after a RAAF cadet decided to do a full and free check of controls as part of his pre-landing checks...
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 23:16
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Well, you never know if they may have developed some form of binding towards the limits of travel between one circuit and the next!
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 23:17
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Earnest K, to be precise.
Actually, it was Ernest K Gann.
PLovett is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2015, 01:33
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,289
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Actually, it was Ernest K Gann
And his books are classics and still very readable and relevant today
Aussie Bob is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.