Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Survived a fishing trip on a boat without SIDS

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Survived a fishing trip on a boat without SIDS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2014, 23:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Survived a fishing trip on a boat without SIDS

I went out on a fishing trip last weekend in a 1948 built commercial fishing vessel. There was no talk about ageing hulls. There was no SIDS programme. It had a whole range of new GPS devices, depth finders and autopilots. None required engineering orders to fit. It had new hydraulic winching gear & a freezer. No STC's, no regulator approval, no engineering orders. The fisherman didn't have an AOC. We didn't need an ASIC to get to the boat. Yet miraculously we survived. We even had a good time.

Compare that with what an equivalent aeroplane would have to go through to mirror our trip flying 1000 ft above us.

Aircraft are often compared with cars, but it seems to me that a better comparison is boats. Both can keep being refitted if the hull is sound.

Why is it that AMSA seem to be able to differentiate different classes of marine use, but CASA seems to want to use an airline cookie cutter on the rest of aviation?
Old Akro is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2014, 23:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arsetrailer
Posts: 288
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds like the Armidale boats need a SIDS
Fred Gassit is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2014, 00:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The difference of course being that if a boat hull fails you are already at sea level...
Hempy is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2014, 01:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old Akro, did the owner of the boat tell you that it was limited to use in the area for only which it is surveyed for and as a result if the owner and his family want to take it on a trip further afield for a weekend that they need to write to the governing authority and have the vessel removed from survey and then have it put back in again at the end of the weekend?

Eg, a mate has a Seawind 1000xl out of Melborne running charters and the boat is surveyed and approved for Port Phillip bay, however if he wants to take it to Hastings (out the heads) or to Wilson's Promontory for a family long weekend or beer trip, then he must do as above.


The grass is not always greener and that's just one example.

What about the fact that the captain of your vessel needs more hours experience at sea than an FO of a 737 requires. 1,500 hours at least and that's even the case for a 4 metre tinny under survey with an 8hp motor!
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2014, 02:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sailed from Fremantle to Bali, broke the record, prepared the boat ourselves, fitted new plotter/GPS, new compasses ( whisky type ) did our compass swing, surveyed our rigging ourselves PBO, and had a pleasant 5 day 23 hour sail.


No interference from anyone, safety inspection done by independent volunteer to Yachting Australia standards, no input from AMSA, no requirement to fit AIS although we had it, only external stipulation for Code 0 offshore ( open ocean ) sailing was all the life saving gear had to be SOLAS.


Aviation is ridiculously over regulated, we managed Fremantle/Bali and return, then the boat went to Hong Kong and is now in Vietnam.
T28D is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2014, 03:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AMSA vs CASA

That there is funny
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2014, 03:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMSA is not a good example. Individual states have their own authorities such as MSV, Marine Safety Victoria, plus there is the department of transport that once inspected my boat for example and the Victorian Water Police in Victoria, oh and Vicroads that issue my boat Licence and registration (state based regos only).

By comparison CASA should be your one stop shop !
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2014, 03:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jaba you are right AMSA vs CASA we just had to tell AMSA we were going and crew number
T28D is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.