Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Flight Instructors annomolies in rules

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Flight Instructors annomolies in rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2014, 23:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kerikeri New Zealand
Age: 89
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight Instructors annomolies in rules

Should one read on the NZCAA web sight (caa.govt.nz) the requirements to be a category C,B,or A Cat Instructors there is a clash of rules.
The 'Consolidated rule state categorically, that to be Issued with a Flight Instructor Rating one MUST hold at least a Commercial Pilots Licence(CPL)
Unfortunately this is what most readers observe and if they are medically degraded to a PPL it is assumed that one cannot hold a A,B,or C cat instructor rating.
WRONG.
Part 61. ( not the consolidation) the Part 61 dated 01-10-1992. This has not been rescinded! States that a PPL may hold an Instructor Rating provided they have met the academic requirements of a CPL.
Quote:
(d) to be eligible for the issue of a Category B Flight Instructor Rating a person shall-
(1) be the holder of at least a current commercial pilot licence for the appropriate aircraft category except that, for aeroplane instruction a person may be the holder of a current private pilot licence (aeroplane) provided that person has complied with the written examination, training, and experience requirements prescribed for the initial issue of a commercial pilot licence (Aeroplane).........

What is the next step? could an RPL instruct if he/she had held an instructor rating but was degraded on medical grounds only (not Financial) as some CAA staff interpret the rules this is not allowed.
gulfairs is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 23:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you talking about a RPL or PPL

Part 61 refers to a PPL not a RPL.
27/09 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 01:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kerikeri New Zealand
Age: 89
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ppl, the rpl was a side issue that has not been addressed,
gulfairs is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2014, 05:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,483
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
if they are medically degraded to a PPL
Is this possible? To actually lose your license for medical reasons as opposed to being unable to exercise the privilege of your license?

What if you "lose your license" for medical reasons, and then next week get better again... do you have to go and re-sit your exams and flight test, or not? I certainly am not up to speed with the differences in Australian and New Zealand rules, but that interpretation sounds very bizzare to me.

In other words, you still hold the license, whether you are permitted to use it or not.
Lasiorhinus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.