Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Chieftain down in SA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2014, 04:11
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: adelaide, Australia
Posts: 469
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No sheep......he's a Kiwi
mostlytossas is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 05:24
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arnold E - Well, it would be interesting to hear of just one good justifiable reason to black out a rego after a crash. It just seems like "ar$e-covering" and deviousness to me. After all, 98% of the population today now have a phone with them at all times, that's capable of good pics - and those phone owners are ready and willing to share pics of exciting happenings, worldwide, at a moments notice.
onetrack is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 08:36
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It just seems like "ar$e-covering" and deviousness to me
Once again, big call, young fella thought he was doing the right thing, nothing more than that.
Arnold E is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 11:13
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,808
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Once again, big call, young fella thought he was doing the right thing, nothing more than that.
If he came up with the idea on his own - big worry. If someone put him up to it - even bigger worry!

DF.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 12:27
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arnold, your answer doesn't address my question, so I guess this means there's no good justifiable reason to cover up the rego, at any time?
So - you're effectively saying, "it seemed like a good idea at the time"? IMO, the move would only make any accident investigator suspicious, and possibly indulge in even more intense scrutiny of the whole scenario.
onetrack is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 19:49
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,222
Received 123 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by onetrack
Arnold E - Well, it would be interesting to hear of just one good justifiable reason to black out a rego after a crash. It just seems like "ar$e-covering" and deviousness to me.
Well, given the CASA rego database is public-access (and don't get me started on that...), if I am out flying my RV and prang it, I don't want some journo finding my name and address, and either rocking up on the doorstep or calling the missus asking how she feels having her hubby in a plane crash when I haven't told her yet.

For company-owned aircraft, perhaps they don't want the media on their doorstep or hounding the office girl for a comment. Both understandable to me.
KRviator is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 20:30
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But it doesn't work....
Creampuff is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 22:03
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While the person covering the Rego probably thought they were helping, the problem is, their actions have now attracted attention, additional to the crash, both in this forum and in the mainstream media.

So now when the journo fronts, after asking How come this plane keeps crashing? They get to ask, How come you tried to cover it up? (I'm trying to think like a journalist with the questions.)
RobShan is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 22:46
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Make note to self. Use white paint to cover rego, not black.

My understanding is that it was a nice very very low time privately owned Chieftan which has a history of only one other incident which was with a previous owner.

Blacking out the rego has backfired, but I've acted as spokesman for accidents twice to draw the press away from those directly involved and its a very unpleasant thing. I have full sympathy for whoever has tried to keep the aircraft identity low key.
Old Akro is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2014, 23:24
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure hiding the Rego in anyway will help in this day and age. ATSB published the details within hours and asking around the aerodrome by a reporter will almost certainly yield the details. And there is the danger, as noted by a previous poster, of the Streisand Effect.

The strategy of getting someone to talk to the press is likely to work far better.

This reminds me of the QF1 runway overrun at Bangkok, where Qantas released photos of the left side of the aircraft to the press, saved the media going out to take photos. They may taken photos of the right side of the aircraft, where the real damage was.

By the way I think the questions I postulated are insensitive and inflammatory, but this is how much of the media works.
RobShan is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 00:16
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately painting over logos or the rego can result in what's known as the Streisand effect...
Is that not being able to see over the nose?

Or running an oxygen rich mixture?

Or putting on excess baggage as you age?

A simple quip of "no comment" is what the media deserve for being oversubscibed to the trough that feeds them.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 02:24
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,808
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Old Akro

My understanding is that it was a nice very very low time privately owned Chieftan which has a history of only one other incident which was with a previous owner.
Don't know how many hours are on it or how nice it is (or should that be was? ) but:

A: Its year of manufacture was 1978, so I doubt if it was low time. I can remember this aircraft from back in my Air BP days at YLEC over 20 years ago. It used to be based in Darwin then.
B: As previously pointed out it's a Navajo not a Chieftain.
C: It is the same aircraft that made a heavy landing at Adelaide Airport on November 2 last year, when the undercarriage of the plane collapsed upon landing, & still has the same owner.

DF.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 08:03
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 350
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OFF is a relatively low time Navajo.
717tech is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 08:05
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A: Its year of manufacture was 1978, so I doubt if it was low time.
It is low time for a Navajo and it is a realy nice aircraft. Has been owned by current owner for many years.
Also cannot understand the angst that has been caused by a young lad blacking out the call sign. Yeah, maybe you are right about modern social media making this act unnessesary, but hey, what the heck, he is a young lad that thought he was helping. There was nothing sinister in the act. I think some of you people need to take a Bex and have a good lie down. No wonder GA is in the state it is in.
By the way, I would be more than happy to employ this young lad and have him work on my aeroplane
Arnold E is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 08:16
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But it doesn't work.

Shooting the messengers won't change that.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 08:22
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But it doesn't work.

Shooting the messengers won't change that.
So what are you saying, I dont understand?? Read the post.

Last edited by Arnold E; 1st Feb 2014 at 08:35.
Arnold E is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 09:06
  #97 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But it doesn't work.
Sure it's not as important now that we have social media, but if it stops one lazy person from Googling the rego, then I would say it has worked. Only suggestion, spray it the same colour as the aircraft!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 09:16
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Queensland
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was flying the Sharkie run past YADG when OFF went down. This explains the flurry of media helicopters that arrived at the field shortly after...
Munz is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 09:25
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,808
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Also cannot understand the angst that has been caused by a young lad blacking out the call sign.
Because it smacks of shonky business, that's why! It makes people wonder what else is being covered up.

DF.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2014, 09:47
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Because it smacks of shonky business,
Bullsh*t.........
Arnold E is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.