Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Chieftain down in SA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jan 2014, 05:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So someone under no immediate pressure came to the considered conclusion that covering up the aircraft’s rego would be an important and effective after-accident action?

By any chance was this idea announced with those immortal words: “I have a cunning plan!”?
Creampuff is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 05:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 133*50 23*50
Posts: 163
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A previous operator I worked for had it in an "emergency response plan"
Mail-man is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 06:08
  #23 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I’ve never heard of anyone spraying over aircraft rego numbers after a prang.
This is a very normal practice, more about keeping the company name out of the papers rather than the aircraft rego!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 06:18
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how many minutes do these operators naively hope the aircraft’s rego and the operator’s identity will remain unpublished on e.g. PPRUNE, the ATSB website ....
Creampuff is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 06:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 1,681
Received 43 Likes on 28 Posts
Painting..

Puffy...many moons ago a Bushies "Metro" out of Emerald, descended "gently" into a field just after t/o on a dark, wet night. Lucky pilot, not so for his undies!

As soon as or before it was dragged back to the field all was obliterated with white paint.
Who was the only Metro operator into EML in those days.?.. Bushies.
The most heard Q at the field ...Why did Bushies paint their Metro white?

Cant imagine what the management thought they were hiding. Probably got more publicity about the painting out of, than the actual accident itself

After the paint was barely dry..out came a HUGE disc cutter..Bbzzzzt....and Bushies metro was no more.!
aroa is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 06:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just goes to show that the human genius for stupidity is almost infinite!
Creampuff is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 06:46
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
"The plane's engines are identical to those which failed on a Whyalla Airlines Piper Chieftain which crashed into Spencer Gulf in 2000, killing eight people."
"The plane was equipped with wings, as was the Concorde aircraft that crashed in France some years ago killing all on board in a fiery crash."
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 07:40
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Chieftains owner has just applied for a replacement slightly-modified aircraft rego, to better reflect his current business aims ...

onetrack is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 07:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My bet is that the fuel tank selector switch was incorrectly set.

Not the first time a Chieftain has lost power on takeoff because of this,
peterc005 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 08:06
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To what do you attribute the rather large bends, aligned with but opposite to the direction of rotation, of all three blades of both propellers?
Creampuff is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 08:08
  #31 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My bet is that the fuel tank selector switch was incorrectly set.
That was my first thought too!

Only have a few hundred hours on Navajos, but seem to remember it is very easy to do!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 08:12
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So run me through why you've discounted the possibility of a wheels-up landing.
Creampuff is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 08:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obviously the props were spinning when it hit the ground.

About ten years ago a client at work operated a Chieftain to visit remote sites, until one had a forced landing in a paddock a 1km from takeoff. Turned out the fuel switch was in the wrong position. The client subsequently bought a King Air.
peterc005 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 08:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And were all three blades of both propellors on that Chieftain bent almost double, aligned with but in the opposite direction to the normal direction of rotation?
Creampuff is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 09:23
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: (Not always) In front of my computer
Posts: 371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a PA-31-310 Navajo, not PA-31-350 Chieftain

Creamie, Your double posting of the directional rotational damage suggests you know the answer. What would cause the props to be bent in the wrong rotational sense? I opened the image and flipped it horizontally, the props are now bent in the correct rotational sense. However the pax door is now on the wrong side of the aircraft.


I cannot think of any reasonable explanation…
Two_dogs is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 09:23
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Next door to the neighbor from hell, who believes in chemtrails!
Age: 75
Posts: 1,808
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
To what do you attribute the rather large bends, aligned with but opposite to the direction of rotation, of all three blades of both propellers?
Could be because they were feathered!

DF.
Desert Flower is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 09:43
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two dogs, you just might be right.

VH-OFF | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
onetrack is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 09:43
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
How many people don't know the difference between a Chieftain (agreed, initially marketed as a Navajo II, then the Chieftain, but counter rotating props and one extra window up the side) and the base model Navajo (same direction of rotation and only four windows)?

This aircraft was a -310 Navajo. The media can be excused for fcuking it up, but many "experts" here don't seem to know the diff.

On the topic of the prop damage, while not professing to be an ATSB investigator, the left appears feathered (hard to tell on the right) and while feathered, but not shut down could be a conclusion, the direction of the bends might be better attributed to touching down with no significant power (props bend back) and then the hubs finishing thier travel into feather after the damage.

(ps, before refering to onetrack's picture above, it has been mirrored)
nb. Posted before I saw CP, 2D or OT's posts if it seems like I'm reitterating.
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 09:45
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
And the 'Winner' is......#28.....

Mr ONETRACK!!!




Creamy - That has been the 'SOP' for many years.
The first time I can remember is an 'Air India' B707 shortfalling - microburst (?) - due TS activity into Bombay (?), many many many years ago - and the man who painted out the 'company colours' got a BIG MENTION in despatches....

And some $$$'s....

The SLF may remember the incident, but without the 'Technicolour' pics, they 'soon fergit' the culprit, and so, 'Sales' are not compromised....well not for long anyway....

Cheers

p.s. And...TKS to 1 TRK, the TROO prefix of G/A in OZ has been displayed for ALL to see!!!
'FUK' - vice 'VH' = HOW CASA views the G/A Multi Million $$ Industry in OUR COUNTRY!!!
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2014, 09:47
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So run me through why you've discounted the possibility of a wheels-up landing
Because they were taking off .
Arnold E is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.