Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Petition | Remove ASIC cards entirely

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Petition | Remove ASIC cards entirely

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2013, 01:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that sounds like a better idea.

like I said nobody has stopped me or done anything when I've been airside without mine visible. If they did what they were supposed to do wouldn't I be stopped and questioned? What's the point of having them if nobody is checking? smaller airfields not too far away have fences that are knee high and there is nobody around watching. That said I cannot quickly come up with a better way to secure aircraft/fields that makes everyone happy, wouldn't cot too much etc etc
kabukiman is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2013, 01:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough for a background check for the initial issue, but renewals should be automatic, simple production of the current ASIC and a fresh photo to get a new one.
They won't let you do that as the AG has decided to exempt the ASIC card from Australian law and you have to declare on your ASIC card things that otherwise would not be an issue.

Yet the ASIC card is not a vaild form of identification.......

I suggest everyone have a read of the fine print on your ASIC application and look at everything you HAVE to declare, even though there are laws in place to protect people from this, the ASIC card is exempt.

Last edited by ga_trojan; 20th Jun 2013 at 01:43.
ga_trojan is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2013, 01:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YPJT
Background check by AUSCHECK which on its own is about $100, admin charge to process by the issuing body and the cost of producing the card. The card with photo is relatively inexpensive and simple but the equipment to put the foil kinegram strip is about a $35,000 investment.
So, the reason why it costs so much is the issuing body is trying to recoup their investment on the equipment. This is fair enough, but couldn't the government subsidized part or all of the ASIC equipment so that the overall costs of the card can be reduced? This is what the people should be lobbying the government about; not a petition to have the card scrapped, because that will never happen. If it didn't cost so much, people wouldn't be whinging about it so much.

A few years ago, I had to get a 'Working with Children" card which involves a similar background check, but only costs $100 (and it's free for volunteers who need the card). But then, the WWC card doesn't have the stylish 'anti-terrorist' foil kinegram strip.
training wheels is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2013, 03:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
If it didn't cost so much, people wouldn't be whinging about it so much.
I disagree.

The whole "security" (blanket) concept is nothing but an embuggerance upon the whole industry and especially upon those least likely to pose any threat - people flying small aeroplanes to/from small population centers, and Security-checked and background-checked airline staff who have to take their boots, belts and bras off every time they go to work.

DG/DAMP-style security & threat awareness training would be a much more worthwhile embuggerance.

The actual costs of the security checks are not too great a burden if there is a reasonable benefit (eg, capital city Heavy jet RPT ops)
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2013, 23:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wollongbar
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot licences should replace ASIC

Hi all,

I'm glad to hear the petition has at least stimulated some debate on the subject here. Although it's unlikely that the petiton will get rid of ASIC entirely there's a chance that pilots could become exempt via a security check from the body issuing their pilot's licence and a photo on their licence. This should to reduce the cost and the hassle of getting another card to fly.

As to the foil strip on the card - How many airfelds or airports have any facility to verify the validity of the card or foil strip. Fake ASICS are available in Bankok for a few dollars just by providing a photo id. I suspect the fakes would be accepted in any airport security in this country. ASIC was poorly thought through and it's implementation rushed through without providing the infrastructure to make it a valid security device.

I think that online petitions are one way of using the Internet to provide grass-root democratic power. The fact that it's easy to sign doesn't reduce the validity of the cause. No matter how easy it is to sign people won't put their name to it if they don't agree with the premise presented.

Cheers,

Greg.
PS Flame-on guys.
GregW_Oz is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2013, 05:13
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks, I need to know who would be a good representative voice for GA on this? Either individual or organisation. Not promising anything but there are some rumblings that might lead to change. Feel free to PM me with details. All info in the strictest confidence.
YPJT is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2013, 23:55
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FG central
Age: 53
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whole system is ridiculously corrupt and repetitive.
I've had to have no less than four "background checks" by whomever does them in the last two years. One for a heavy vehicle licence, one for an ASIC renewal and two with various recruitment agencies.
Surely the relevant data would still be held by those that actually do the checking and they're just pissing themselves laughing at every irrelevant background check that is repeated so frequently? I can hear them laughing in glee as their accounts fill with money for pointless repetition...
Instead of an ASIC card, why not a "Fit and proper person" card that has weight outside of the narrow scope it's issued with? So the person who has had the checks done can simply wave it when asked and that's all that is needed?
You all do know there is an MSIC card as well? Essentially the same card for marine operations...why not just one card for many uses?

Last edited by Typhoon650; 21st Jun 2013 at 23:56.
Typhoon650 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 01:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We could call it the Australia Card...
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 03:58
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Close
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was recently sent a letter (to my home address) from a financial institution asking me to verify my address for the purpose of ensuring that correspondence was being sent to the correct address.....I shake my head.....

In response I sent back the pre-paid response envelope empty....and I felt better after doing that. I know this has nothing to do with ASIC cards but thought I'd chuck it in anyway....

STiky
Stikybeke is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 08:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You all do know there is an MSIC card as well? Essentially the same card for marine operations...why not just one card for many uses?
The MSIC clearance is slightly less restrictive than for the ASIC. You can transfer an ASIC clearance to MSIC but not vice versa.
YPJT is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 10:07
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: have I forgotten or am I lost?
Age: 71
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never been able to renew my asic because the software always crashes.

if we need an asic why not make it for 10 years at a time? ...like a passport.
dubbleyew eight is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2013, 14:40
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
...if we need an asic why not make it for 10 years at a time? ...like a passport.
Why not open ended ? as others have pointed out if yer been a bit of a terrorist since yer got the ASIC yer probably already contained...






.

Last edited by Flying Binghi; 23rd Jun 2013 at 01:50.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2013, 09:15
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
asic renewals

they also require a new copy of birth certificates and drivers lic for each renewal why most of us were only born once. also heard some RAAF people dont reconise them!!
denho is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2013, 13:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would anyone know what would be the percentage of current pilots who apply for an ASIC have it rejected? I would imagine it be around 0% if not zero.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 03:17
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good question cattle truck. Across tHe board for all ASIC applicants the percentage is very low. Sorry I don't have exact figures. Whether that percentage is proportionate specifically with pilots I don't know. The only pilots I've known to have any trouble are first time applicants undergoing training.
YPJT is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 03:25
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
...I don't have exact figures. Whether that percentage is proportionate specifically with pilots I don't know...
So your saying zero % it is.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 10:38
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: inner suburbia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From ASIOs 2011-12 annual report. http://www.asio.gov.au/img/files/ASI...-12_part-2.pdf
Counter-terrorism security assessments
Counter-terrorism security assessments are conducted to assess the suitability of a person on counter-terrorism grounds to access areas or materials that are restricted, such as Australia’s air and maritime ports, other security sensitive facilities, access to dangerous goods or accreditation to special events. Requests for counter-terrorism security assessments are received by ASIO from AusCheck and the Australian Federal Police, with the vast majority requested by AusCheck for aviation and maritime security identification cards.
In 2011–12, ASIO completed 153,644 counter-terrorism security assessments, a 40 per cent increase on those completed for 2010–11. No adverse or qualified counter-terrorism security assessments were issued in 2011–12.
If, as a citizen, you haven't come to the attention of any criminal investigatory agencies then there are no electronic records hence ASIO can't really issue an 'adverse finding'.
I mean, ASIO is not going to interview your co-workers, friends, referees, etc, for a crappy ASIC card.

The main purpose of the biennial expiry is to not allow perpetual trust to exist., but with a simple change to the system the current 'security' level could still be maintained and we would undergo less crap and expense and (dare one hope) the ASIC could become used as an identity document.
The change is that ASICs are automatically re-issued unless ASIO has determined in its' regular trawls through the various criminal databases that the recipient is of concern to them.

Last edited by Biggles_in_Oz; 25th Jun 2013 at 10:56.
Biggles_in_Oz is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 13:57
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So your saying zero % it is.
I don't believe I am saying that at all.

Biggles, very good points mate. For the life of me I cannot see why such a system would not work. WRT the ASIO not finding any adverse or CT security assessmen the percentage that Auscheck refuse are because of other security relevant offences as prescribed in the regs such as theft, drugs, violence etc.
YPJT is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2013, 22:53
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Security is now a huge money making industry, I've said it b4 & to me it's obvious that if someone is determined to break thru the security system they will find a way & do so, I mean sheez paranoia is rife now around airports as they security goons are too busy checking the ones with ASIC cards to not notice the clever ones getting under the 'fence'!


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2013, 03:55
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
...too busy checking the ones with ASIC cards to not notice the clever ones getting under the 'fence'!
There are those who look to get 'over' the fence.

Who needs an ASIC...

German police foil Islamist terror plot to use remote controlled aircraft filled with explosives as guided missiles



Read more: German police foil Islamist terror plot to use remote controlled aircraft filled with explosives as guided missiles | Mail Online

Last edited by Flying Binghi; 26th Jun 2013 at 03:55.
Flying Binghi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.