Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Channel 10 Chopper Reported Crash Near Perth.

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Channel 10 Chopper Reported Crash Near Perth.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2013, 01:55
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mydadsbag
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this safety management system rubbish is bureaucracy gone mad to account for the lowest common denominator. Let people turn their own brains back on without having to be regulated and take some responsibility for themselves.
Here here!
Ive had a gutfull of the "hanger onners" in this industry. They add very little and make a days work a ballache!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bbbbbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Mr.Buzzy is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 02:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Operator and captain responsibility over-ride crew/passenger clothing choices.
autoflight is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 04:37
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Geelong
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with the thought of LTE. Over the years there has being 2 media helicopter crashes in Australia that I know of where LTE was the cause.The first is the Channel 7 helicopter that crashed at Lang Lang in Victoria in the early 80's while filming a truck crash and the second was a Channel 10 helicopter in Sydney that crashed while filming the city to surf fun run. In more recent times an R44 had LTE while filming a yacht race in Melbourne,but the big difference is this pilot had the altitude to recover and make a successful emergency landing.
trex 700 is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 04:52
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,387
Received 221 Likes on 101 Posts
Let people turn their own brains back on without having to be regulated and take some responsibility for themselves.
Sadly in this litigious society, some ambulance-chasing lawyer will sue the operator for not forcing the cameraman to wear safety gear and to attend courses such as HUET.

Plenty of responses have belittled the TV stations for the things that appear in the news, for which they dispatch the aerial news-gatherer. I have flown many a media group, and I was amazed by the effort I had to go through to get an approval to land on a suburban sports field, negotiate a flight plan with ATC and dodge various fixed-wing on finals for Mascot, only to find out that the crew was planning to interview some rockape football player. Waste of good resources.

But that is what the news director wants, a 5-second grab with a cauliflower-eared millionaire. Or a shot of a truck that rolled over.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 06:07
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 43 S
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]Sadly in this litigious society, some ambulance-chasing lawyer will sue the operator for not forcing the cameraman to wear safety gear and to attend courses such as HUET./QUOTE]

He actually praised his HUET training undertaken only recently as being a factor in him getting out alive
plenty of footage on you tube etc.
He did what I tell and expect my pax to do and fortunately was able to survive a ride from hell to be ball busted by all and sundry sitting in front of a computer

Best wishes to both men
aldee is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 10:45
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 51
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend to be more of the opinion that the crew can wear what they like.
In tend to agree to a point...more in closing.

They know their job
does he??

and if they are too stupid to wear the appropriate clothing for the task they are performing then more fool them. Its their problem. All this safety management system rubbish is bureaucracy gone mad to account for the lowest common denominator.
You echo my thoughts precisely

Let people turn their own brains back on without having to be regulated and take some responsibility for themselves.
I agree with this, but with a training viewpoint. I see an operation like this as a tradesman/apprentice relationship. The PIC is the tradesman and the camerman is the apprentice. Sure the camera jockey has had training..in HIS field. Sure he's been shown how to use the safety harness, but nobody has looked out for him in relation to his other safety gear and explained to him how it could potentially benefit him.

No it doesn't need an SMS, i see it as simply as one of my apprentices using an angle grinder without goggles or ear muffs. A simple tap on the shoulder and chat will normally suffice. Like you say some common sense.

TV helo ops are dangerous, and i think all crew members should at least get advise on ways they can best protect themselves in the even of the unthinkable.

Think about it.....PIC is wearing full gear.......................................

would you/should you say something to the cameraman?

Last edited by jas24zzk; 21st Jan 2013 at 10:46.
jas24zzk is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 11:09
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Lang Lang one was interesting. Aside from the fact that it was overloaded, a witness (whom I know of and have recently spoken to) reported hearing a bang followed by LTE but if I'm not mistaken was not mentioned in the report. Seems that you void all warranties if you are over MTOW so to speak.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 23:03
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,254
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
In more recent times an R44 had LTE while filming a yacht race in Melbourne,but the big difference is this pilot had the altitude to recover and
make a successful emergency landing.
Didn't the pilot land on St Kilda beach and walked away from flying for good?
Lookleft is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2013, 03:10
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Motorola you shouldnt be allowed within 500 miles of a keyboard and internet connection.

Who they hell are you to judge? Were you there? Have you ever been in those circumstances yourself? Do you have anything other than some out of context media footage and your own opinion to support throwing around slanderous comments about someone and something you know nothing about. I would say you wouldnt know enough to be able to tell your arse was on fire until your ears started burning.

If you were any kind of aviator you would know that protocol demands that the pilots instructions are followed to the letter - ever thought the pilot in this case might have given the comand to get the hell out asap? Did you ever consider had the cameraman questioned protocol and gone against his training and proceedures it could have cost both of them their lives? I could go on, but why bother, if youre not starting to get it by about now, you probably never will. Id hate to be your PIC in an emergency situation, you would be a lose cannon, if the crash didnt prove fatal your actions probably would.

For the record, what you didnt see footage of was the cameraman realising the pilot had not exited the aircraft and going back for him, only to be restrained from doing so by some of the many emergency services staff who were already in attendance for the initial truck rollover.

You owe the cameraman a very ppublic pprune apology, the only question is - do you have the integrity to make it?

I understand the knitting circle here survives mostly on a diet of gossip, speculation and confabulation but your comments go way past that. You are rude, ignorant, out of line and with absolutely no respect for the people involved. You are a coward and an idiot. You hide behind a screen, expousing potentially hurtful crap under a ficticious name. If youre going to bag someone grow some balls and man up, otherwise, shut the hell up Mouth. Fools like you really sh*t me.
rachbuzz is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2013, 03:19
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here, here Trent.
rachbuzz is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2013, 04:03
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerodynamisist- there was no fire
rachbuzz is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2013, 05:02
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Theville
Age: 43
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
hearing a bang followed by LTE
A bang usually precedes loss of tail rotor DRIVE, not LTE. LTE is purely aerodynamic/design issue where the tail rotor isn't capable of providing the thrust to overcome the torque reaction of the main rotor under certain circumstances.

Back to sleeping in your car at YSBK mate....

Last edited by Username here; 25th Jan 2013 at 06:45.
Username here is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2013, 06:49
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Happy with your explanation as I'm not a heli pilot. In my mind if the tail rotor isn't spinning then it's not being effective, which is technically incorrect. So LTE isn't mechanical, makes sense. Poor terminology on my behalf. To rephrase, loud bang, followed by spinning. As for sleeping in the car it was only really a powernap whilst waiting for them to open up.
VH-XXX is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.