Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Std Phraseology in NZ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2011, 05:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Std Phraseology in NZ

I've had a look but can't find what I'm after. At this stage I only have online access, which is doing my head in. It used to be the IFG and Planning Manual but clearly things have moved on. Looking for the pages in NZ AIP that outline standard phraseology in NZ.

Calling for clearance, taxi etc.

ENR 1.1 doesn't cover it all. Where's the rest? Will be back there soon and trying to make the effort before I get there.

Many thanks
waren9 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 05:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oop Norf'
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.caa.govt.nz/Advisory_Circulars/AC91-9_AC172-1.pdf

Enjoy.
Got the horn is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 05:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Std Phraseology in NZ

Us thut shup wuth unyone, bro?

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 05:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz
Posts: 311
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Just read the QNH back every couple of minutes (whuch wull guv you the shuts eh bro), otherwise NZ's pretty standard . . .
esreverlluf is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 05:46
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GTH

Thanks for that.
waren9 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 06:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... and always substitute the word CHOICE for:
Roger
Affirm
Wilco

... if you are communicating with male ATC, then it's CHOICE BRO.
FokkerInYour12 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 07:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Dont forget the dumbass POB readback when you ask fur cleerunce..
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 07:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Live in Taupiri, Waikato, work in the big smoke, New Zealand
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But where the hell did this "ABC, fully ready" come from... I don't give a rats if you're only "partially ready"!!!
slackie is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 07:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Its a UK thing Slackie..but it creeps in everywhere
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 09:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It also seems the saying 'with you' and 'ready in turn' are becoming prolific.

eg ABC tower, XYZ with you ready in turn holding point alpha
or
Control XYZ with you passing 3000ft

Its obvious you are 'with' a particular controller when you are talking to them, and they know you will go when its your turn, and not try to jump the queue.

All the mindless drivel on the radio drives me nuts!
6080ft is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 10:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But where the hell did this "ABC, fully ready" come from... I don't give a rats if you're only "partially ready"!!!
Agreed either you're ready or you're not, only a Pom could come up with a call like this.

All the mindless drivel on the radio drives me nuts!
Not to mention the mindless ATC drivel, like using three radio transmissions when one would suffice, or saying "behind the aircraft on final line up behind".. I heard you the first f**king time you said the word 'behind' and I'm not likely to line up in front of the aircraft on final am I?
27/09 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 10:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to mention the mindless ATC drivel, like using three radio transmissions when one would suffice, or saying "behind the aircraft on final line up behind".. I heard you the first f**king time you said the word 'behind' and I'm not likely to line up in front of the aircraft on final am I?
Actually, this is standard ICAO phraseology, designed to help prevent runway incursions. But then you knew that already, didn't you?
Oakape is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 11:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gisborne
Age: 55
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Muppets

The number of professional pilots going into procedural airspace blerting straight into what they have to say without first establishing comms with the tower. Best thing the twr could do is ignore them until they get it right. Then the ones that say XYZ airborne Rotorua throught 3000 climbing 4000 Totra 3 departure, well strike me, never knew that the Totra departure is in NZRO. And dont get me started on the ALTITUDE nonsense that gets thown all around the airwaves around NZHN. When in Rome boys... ur not in the UK now. The FRTO rating appears to be found in the bottom of a weetbix box now days, most I am sure have never even read AC172-1 Then we have the parrotts that have to read everything back verbatim when a WILCO will surfice.

Happy Flightings
Kiwi172 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 11:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,679
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Not to mention the mindless ATC drivel, like using three radio transmissions when one would suffice, or saying "behind the aircraft on final line up behind".. I heard you the first f**king time you said the word 'behind' and I'm not likely to line up in front of the aircraft on final am I?
This has happened. It was an inset departure that missed hearing the "behind" and lined up in front of departing traffic. The departure aborted, and had to swerve into the grass to avoid the lighty.

The adoption of the ICAO standard came about not too long after that.

3 radio tx when one would suffice? Guilty as charged, sometimes. Depends on the workload I think the pilot may be experiencing. It is recommended that a maximum of 3 important items be contained in a radio transmission. 3 simple items is fine. Real complex instructions/information? Slow and thorough. Saves many repeats.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 23:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 267
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
I think "fully ready" really came across from Sydney - as in "fully sick"
drpixie is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2011, 00:40
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one I hate is "XXX enters, backtracks and lines up". No... you are "entering, backtracking and lining up"...

The there is the odd habit of saying "XXX rolling on the YYYYYZZ departure".

And as for reporting POB to towers... what an utter waste of time. Only in NZ...

BTW the "behind the aircraft on final line up behind" phraseology came into common use in Europe after an accident between a Streamline Shorts 330 and an Air Liberte MD-83 at Paris Charles De Gaulle in May 2000. A report can be downloaded - www.bea.aero/docspa/2000/g-wn000525a/pdf/g-wn000525a.pdf

Last edited by remoak; 10th Jul 2011 at 01:08.
remoak is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2011, 03:07
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
And as for reporting POB to towers... what an utter waste of time. Only in NZ...
No, I believe that it is required at joint military/civil aerodrome where the RAAF do Approach and Tower, ie Townsville, Darwin etc. If you don't give it to them, they will ask for it.

Those of us who fly regularly from such aerodrome just get into a habit - which may seem odd when you are elsewhere.

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2011, 05:40
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont forget the dumbass POB readback when you ask fur cleerunce..
And as for reporting POB to towers... what an utter waste of time. Only in NZ...
What is the big deal guys?

So when you prang on take-off, the tower has your POB on hand to give to the RFF so as they immediately know how many to look for, instead of having to wait until someone gets on the phone to the company & tries to ascertain just how many people were on board.

I would have thought that was a good thing.

It also means the the RFF personnel are not risking their lives unnecessarily by going back into burning wreckage looking for people when everyone is already out.
Oakape is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2011, 06:48
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
What is the big deal guys?

So when you prang on take-off, the tower has your POB on hand to give to the RFF so as they immediately know how many to look for, instead of having to wait until someone gets on the phone to the company & tries to ascertain just how many people were on board.

I would have thought that was a good thing.

It also means the the RFF personnel are not risking their lives unnecessarily by going back into burning wreckage looking for people when everyone is already out.
Ummmm certainly on the flights I operate, I was under the impression that the filed flight-plan contained the POB (you know, the ICAO format at the back of the plog)..now I know its subject to LMC's etc, but thats the point of signing and handing a copy of the loadsheet to the handling agent..who BTW at NZAA have an electronic record of the POB as they close the flight.
Just seems like an archaic rule that no one has had the common sense to change.
The only other place I have struck this is in deeeepest darkest Africa, SIN and the former soviet bloc countries.
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2011, 07:18
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct... the information is readily available without wasting air time. If it's an aircraft of any size, the information won't be required immediately in any case... plus the cabin crew will take the manifest with them when they leave.

The only time there is any point to this call is when the crew are all dead following the accident, in which case all you are doing is checking for the correct number of bodies anyway. No real urgency there.
remoak is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.